Systems and methods for presenting web application content
US-12164587-B2 · Dec 10, 2024 · US
US2016110176A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016110176-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514820998-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Aug 7, 2015 |
| Priority date | Oct 21, 2014 |
| Publication date | Apr 21, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present disclosure relates generally to the field of automatic conversion of sequential array-based programs to parallel MapReduce programs. In various examples, automatic conversion of sequential array-based programs to parallel MapReduce programs may be implemented in the form of systems, methods and/or algorithms.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method for automatic conversion of a sequential array-based program to a parallel program, the method comprising: obtaining, by a processor, an Array SSA representation of the sequential array-based program; transforming, by the processor, the Array SSA representation into a Lambda Calculus representation that includes a construct for representing loops; and replacing, by the processor, the loop construct with a plurality of operators to generate an executable parallel program. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the replacing of the loop construct generates a plurality of unoptimized parallel programs. 3 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising: generating, by the processor, a plurality of optimized and executable parallel programs based upon the unoptimized parallel programs; selecting, by the processor, one of the optimized and executable parallel programs; and translating, by the processor, the selected optimized and executable parallel program to another language. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, the replacing of the loop construct uses a plurality of MapReduce operators to generate a plurality of unoptimized Lambda Calculus MapReduce programs. 5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising: generating, by the processor, a plurality of optimized and executable MapReduce programs based upon the unoptimized Lambda Calculus MapReduce programs; selecting, by the processor, one of the optimized and executable MapReduce programs; and translating, by the processor, the selected optimized and executable MapReduce program to another language. 6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein at least one of: (a) the translating translates the selected optimized and executable MapReduce program back to a high-level language; (b) the translating translates the selected optimized and executable MapReduce program to machine code; and (c) the translating translates the selected optimized and executable MapReduce program in a form for use in a hardware circuit. 7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving, by the processor, the sequential array-based program. 8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the obtaining comprises transforming, by the processor, the received sequential array-based program into the Array SSA representation of the sequential array-based program. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the replacing is performed using term rewrite rules. 10 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the generating comprises applying optimizations comprising loop fusion to the unoptimized Lambda Calculus MapReduce programs. 11 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the sequential array-based program of which the processor obtains an Array SSA representation is in a first high-level language and the optimized parallel programs are translated back to the first high-level language. 12 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the sequential array-based program of which the processor obtains an Array SSA representation is in a first high-level language and the optimized parallel programs are translated back to a second high-level language that is different from the first high-level language. 13 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the selecting is performed via at least one of: (a) analysis of parallelism; (b) performance testing; or (c) any combination thereof.
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.