Method and system for authenticating user content
US-2024394347-A1 · Nov 28, 2024 · US
US2016103996A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016103996-A1 |
| Application number | US-201414510772-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Oct 9, 2014 |
| Priority date | Oct 9, 2014 |
| Publication date | Apr 14, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computing device processor may be configured with processor-executable instructions to implement methods of using behavioral analysis and machine learning techniques to identify, prevent, correct, or otherwise respond to malicious or performance-degrading behaviors of the computing device. As part of these operations, the processor may generate user-persona information that characterizes the user based on that user's activities, preferences, age, occupation, habits, moods, emotional states, personality, device usage patterns, etc. The processor may use the user-persona information to dynamically determine the number of device features that are monitored or evaluated in the computing device, to identify the device features that are most relevant to determining whether the device behavior is not consistent with a pattern of ordinary usage of the computing device by the user, and to better identify or respond to non-benign behaviors of the computing device.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method of analyzing a device behavior in a computing device, comprising: monitoring by a processor of the computing device activities of a software application operating on the computing device to generate user-persona information that characterizes a user of the computing device; and using the user-persona information to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein using the user-persona information to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign comprises: using the generated user-persona information to dynamically determining device features to be monitored or evaluated in the computing device so as to balance tradeoffs between performance and security. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein using the user-persona information to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign comprises: using the generated user-persona information to identify device features that are most relevant to determining whether the device behavior is not consistent with a pattern of ordinary usage of the computing device by the user. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein using the user-persona information to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign further comprises: monitoring the identified device features to collect behavior information; generating a behavior vector that characterizes the collected behavior information; and applying the generated behavior vector to a classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign. 5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising generating a user-specific classifier model that evaluates the identified device features, wherein applying the generated behavior vector to the classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign comprises applying the generated behavior vector to the user-specific classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign. 6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein: generating the user-specific classifier model that evaluates the identified device features comprises: receiving a full classifier model that includes a plurality of test conditions; identifying test conditions in the plurality of test conditions that evaluate the identified device features; and generating the user-specific classifier model to include identified test conditions; and applying the generated behavior vector to the user-specific classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign comprises: applying the generated behavior vector to the user-specific classifier model so as to evaluate each test condition included in the user-specific classifier model; computing a weighted average of each result of evaluating test conditions in the user-specific classifier model; and determining whether the device behavior is non-benign based on the computed weighted average. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein monitoring activities of the software application comprises monitoring a user-interaction between the user and the software application. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the user-persona information comprises generating information that characterizes the user's mood, the method further comprising determining whether the user's mood is relevant to analyzing behavior information collected by monitoring device features. 9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising: generating a behavior vector that correlates the collected behavior information for which the user's mood is relevant to the user's mood at the time the behavior information was collected; and applying the generated behavior vector to a classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign. 10 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising: generating a classifier model that includes a decision node that evaluates a device feature in relation to the user's mood; and applying a behavior vector to the classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign. 11 . A computing device, comprising: a processor configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations comprising: monitoring activities of a software application operating on the computing device to generate user-persona information that characterizes a user of the computing device; and using the user-persona information to determine whether a device behavior is non-benign. 12 . The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that using the user-persona information to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign comprises: using the generated user-persona information to dynamically determining device features to be monitored or evaluated in the computing device so as to balance tradeoffs between performance and security. 13 . The computing device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that using the user-persona information to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign comprises: using the generated user-persona information to identify device features that are most relevant to determining whether the device behavior is not consistent with a pattern of ordinary usage of the computing device by the user. 14 . The computing device of claim 13 , wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that using the user-persona information to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign further comprises: monitoring the identified device features to collect behavior information; generating a behavior vector that characterizes the collected behavior information; and applying the generated behavior vector to a classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign. 15 . The computing device of claim 14 , wherein: the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations further comprising generating a user-specific classifier model that evaluates the identified device features; and the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that applying the generated behavior vector to the classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign comprises applying the generated behavior vector to the user-specific classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign. 16 . The computing device of claim 15 , wherein the processor is configured with processor-executable instructions to perform operations such that: generating the user-specific classifier model that evaluates the identified device features comprises: receiving a full classifier model that includes a plurality of test conditions; identifying test conditions in the plurality of test conditions that evaluate the identified device features; and generating the user-specific classifier model to include identified test conditions; and applying the generated behavior vector to the user-specific classifier model to determine whether the device behavior is non-benign comprises: applying the generated behavior vector to the user-specific classifier model so as to evaluate each test condition included in the user-specific classifier model; computing a weighted average of each result of evaluating test conditions in the user-specific classifier model; and determining whether the device behavior is non-benign based on the computed weighted average. 17 . The comput
by observing the pattern of computer usage, e.g. typical user behaviour · CPC title
monitoring of user actions (tracking the activity of the user H04L67/535) · CPC title
Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security · CPC title
where the computing system component is a central processing unit [CPU] · CPC title
Anti-malware arrangements, e.g. protection against SMS fraud or mobile malware · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.