Methods and Systems for Performing Cost Comparisons

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2016019662-A1
Application number	US-201414335387-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Jul 18, 2014
Priority date	Jul 18, 2014
Publication date	Jan 21, 2016
Grant date	—

Abstract

Various arrangements are presented for performing comparisons of indented cost BOM (bill of material) structures of two or more items in a supply chain management system. By understanding the hierarchical nature of the indented cost BOM structure of each item and various nested relationships, it may be possible to perform complex comparisons that involve multi-level structures.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1 . A method for performing a cost comparison of at least a first item and a second item, the method comprising:
receiving, by a computer system, a request for the cost comparison that identifies the first item and the second item; based on the request, determining, by the computer system, a first cost bill of materials (BOM) structure for the first item and a second cost BOM structure for the second item; comparing, by the computer system, the first cost BOM structure to the second cost BOM structure to identify a first group of entries that are common to the first cost BOM structure and the second cost BOM structure, the first group of entries comprising a plurality of components and resources; identifying, by the computer system, a second group of entries present in the first cost BOM structure but not the second cost BOM structure; identifying, by the computer system, a third group of entries present in the second cost BOM structure but not the first cost BOM structure; determining, by the computer system, for each entry of each cost BOM structure, a cost associated with the entry; and creating, by the computer system, a listing of the first group of entries, the second group of entries, and the third group of entries, wherein the first group of entries has, for at least one entry of the first group of entries, the first item is associated with a different cost than the second item.

2 . The method for performing the cost comparison of claim 1 , wherein the first item and the second item are a same type of item, but are manufactured at geographically-separated manufacturing facilities.

3 . The method for performing the cost comparison of claim 1 , wherein the cost for a first entry present on the first cost BOM structure and the second cost BOM structure comprises a cost related to overhead.

4 . The method for performing the cost comparison of claim 3 , wherein a second entry present on the first cost BOM structure and the second cost BOM structure is acquired from different suppliers for the first item and the second item.

5 . The method for performing the cost comparison of claim 1 , the method further comprising:
outputting, by the computer system, for presentation the listing of the first group of entries, the second group of entries, and the third group of entries in the form of a table to a user computer system from which the request was received.

6 . The method for performing the cost comparison of claim 1 , wherein the first group of entries is listed in the listing above the second group of entries and the third group of entries.

7 . The method for performing the cost comparison of claim 5 , wherein at least one entry of the first group of entries is comprised of a plurality of components, the method further comprising:
outputting, by the computer system, for presentation a first entry of the first group of entries as a collapsible field within the table, wherein:
the collapsible field, when collapsed, indicates a total cost for a subassembly of the first item and the second item, and
the collapsible field, when expanded, lists costs for each component of the subassembly for the first item and the second item.

8 . A system for performing a cost comparison of at least a first item and a second item, the system comprising:
one or more processors; and a memory communicatively coupled with and readable by the one or more processors and having stored therein processor-readable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
receive a request for the cost comparison that identifies the first item and the second item;
based on the request, determine a first cost bill of materials (BOM) structure for the first item and a second cost BOM structure for the second item;
compare the first cost BOM structure to the second cost BOM structure to identify a first group of entries that are common to the first cost BOM structure and the second cost BOM structure, the first group of entries comprising a plurality of components and resources;
identify a second group of entries present in the first cost BOM structure but not the second cost BOM structure;
identify a third group of entries present in the second cost BOM structure but not the first cost BOM structure;
determine for each entry of each cost BOM structure, a cost associated with the entry; and
create a listing of the first group of entries, the second group of entries, and the third group of entries, wherein the first group of entries has, for at least one entry of the first group of entries, the first item is associated with a different cost than the second item.

9 . The system for performing the cost comparison of claim 8 , wherein the first item and the second item are a same type of item, but are manufactured at geographically-separated manufacturing facilities.

10 . The system for performing the cost comparison of claim 8 , wherein the cost for a first entry present on the first cost BOM structure and the second cost BOM structure comprises a cost related to overhead.

11 . The system for performing the cost comparison of claim 10 , wherein a second entry present on the first cost BOM structure and the second cost BOM structure is acquired from different suppliers for the first item and the second item.

12 . The system for performing the cost comparison of claim 8 , wherein the processor-readable instructions, when executed, further cause the one or more processors to:
output for presentation the listing of the first group of entries, the second group of entries, and the third group of entries in the form of a table to a user computer system from which the request was received.

13 . The system for performing the cost comparison of claim 8 , wherein the first group of entries is listed in the listing above the second group of entries and the third group of entries.

14 . The system for performing the cost comparison of claim 12 , wherein at least one entry of the first group of entries is comprised of a plurality of components, and the processor-readable instructions, when executed, further cause the one or more processors to:
output for presentation a first entry of the first group of entries as a collapsible field within the table, wherein:
the collapsible field, when collapsed, indicates a total cost for a subassembly of the first item and the second item, and
the collapsible field, when expanded, lists costs for each component of the subassembly for the first item and the second item.

15 . A non-transitory processor-readable medium for performing a cost comparison of at least a first item and a second item, comprising processor-readable instructions configured to cause one or more processors to:
receive a request for the cost comparison that identifies the first item and the second item; based on the request, determine a first cost bill of materials (BOM) structure for the first item and a second cost BOM structure for the second item; compare the first cost BOM structure to the second cost BOM structure to identify a first group of entries that are common to the first cost BOM structure and the second cost BOM structure, the first group of entries comprising a plurality of components and resources; identify a second group of entries present in the first cost BOM structure but not the second cost BOM structure; identify a third group of entries present in the second cost BOM structure but not the first cost BOM structure; determine for each entry of each cost BOM structure, a cost associated with the entry; and create

Assignees

• Oracle Int Corp

Inventors

• Pineda Ivan Canales
• Jha Anup Kumar
• Zhu Rixin
• Pathak Ashish
• Yang Fan
• So Bryan Siu Him
• Raman Ramchand

Classifications

• G06Q10/06313

  Resource planning in a project environment · CPC title

• G06Q50/04 Primary

  Manufacturing · CPC title

• Y02P90/30

  Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing · CPC title