Automatic task classification based upon machine learning

US2016019471A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2016019471-A1
Application numberUS-201514871595-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateSep 30, 2015
Priority dateNov 27, 2013
Publication dateJan 21, 2016
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A system and method is provided that processes a training database of human-generated requests in each of a plurality of task categories with a machine learning algorithm to develop a task classifier model that may be applied to subsequent user requests to determine the most likely one of the task categories for the subsequent user request.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1 . A machine-implemented method, comprising: collecting a plurality of human-generated requests for each of a plurality of task categories to create a training database of user requests; extracting a training feature vector from each user request in the training database by assigning a binary value to each different word in the user request to form a training data set having a plurality of training feature vectors for each task category; processing the training feature vectors in the training data set to determine a task classifier model for each task category; receiving an additional request from a user, the additional request being classifiable into one of the task categories; and in the machine, comparing an extracted feature vector from the additional request to the task classifier model to determine a predicted task category for the additional request. 2 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: in the machine, comparing words in the additional request to a dictionary of possible values for at least one query class for the predicted task category to identify matching words or phrases in the additional request for the at least one task parameter. 3 . The machine-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising: servicing the additional request by using the matching words or phrases. 4 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining whether the predicted task requires an external contents provider for its completion or whether the predicted task can be performed by a portable device of the user; invoking an application program interface for the external contents provider responsive to a determination that the predicted task requires the external contents provider for its completion; and invoking an application program interface for a program on the portable device responsive to a determination that the predicted task can be performed by the portable device. 5 . The machine-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the portable device comprises a cellular telephone. 6 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the additional request comprises a natural language request, the method further comprising: converting the natural language request into a text input; and extracting the feature vector from the text input. 7 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein processing the training data set to determine a task classifier model comprises applying a machine learning algorithm to the training data set. 8 . The machine-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the machine learning algorithm comprise a support vector machine training algorithm. 9 . The machine-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the machine learning algorithm comprises a naïve Bayes algorithm. 10 . The machine-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the task categories include a restaurant search task category, a call task category, an email task category, and a transportation task category. 11 . A system, comprising: a machine learning trainer module configured to extract a feature vector from a plurality of user requests for each of a plurality of task categories by an assignment of a binary value to each different word in each of the user requests, the trainer module being further configured to process the feature vectors to generate a task classifier model for each of the task categories; a task classifier module configured to extract a first feature vector from a first user request corresponding to one of the task categories and to compare the first feature vector to the task classifier model to predict a task category corresponding to the first user request; a query extraction module configured to compare the first user request to a dictionary of possible values for at least one task parameter for the predicted task category to identify matching words or phrases in the first user request for the at least one task parameter; and a task execution module configured to analyze the predicted task category to determine whether the predicted task category requires an external contents provider for its completion or whether the predicted task category can be performed by a portable device of the user; and a task execution module configured to invoke an application programming interface for the external contents provider with the identified words or phrases responsive to a determination that the predicted task category requires the external contents provider for its completion. 12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the task execution module is further configured to invoke an application programming interface for the user's portable device with the identified words or phrases responsive to a determination that the predicted task category can be performed by the user's portable device. 13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the predicted task categories include a restaurant search task category, a call task category, an email task category, and a transportation task category. 14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the machine learning training module is configured to develop the task classifier model using a support vector machine training algorithm. 15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the machine learning training module is configured to develop the task classifier model using a naïve Bayes algorithm. 16 . The system of claim 11 , further comprising a natural language to text converter module configured to convert a natural language input into a text input comprising the first user's request.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Scheduling strategies for dispatcher, e.g. round robin, multi-level priority queues · CPC title

  • G06N99/005Primary

    Physics · mapped topic

  • G06N20/00Primary

    Machine learning · CPC title

  • Natural language query formulation · CPC title

  • using lexical or orthographic knowledge sources · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2016019471A1 cover?
A system and method is provided that processes a training database of human-generated requests in each of a plurality of task categories with a machine learning algorithm to develop a task classifier model that may be applied to subsequent user requests to determine the most likely one of the task categories for the subsequent user request.
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Ntt Docomo Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06N99/005. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Jan 21 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 1 related publication on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).