Identifying question answerers in a question asking system

US2016019280A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2016019280-A1
Application numberUS-201313842570-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateMar 15, 2013
Priority dateMar 15, 2013
Publication dateJan 21, 2016
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Methods and systems are provided for a question answering. In some implementations, a question is received from a question asker. A complexity metric associated with the question is determined. One or more potential question answerers to answer the question are identified. For each of the one or more potential question answerers, a sophistication metric is determined. At least the sophistication metric and the complexity metric are analyzed to generate a metric analysis. A question answerer to answer the question is selected from the potential question answerers based at least in part on the metric analysis.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

1 . A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving an unanswered question from a question asker; determining, by at least one processor, a complexity metric associated with the unanswered question based on an attribute of at least one of the question or the question asker; identifying one or more potential question answerers to answer the unanswered question; for each of the one or more potential question answerers, determining a sophistication metric; analyzing, by at least one processor, at least the sophistication metric and the complexity metric to generate a metric analysis; and selecting, by at least one processor, a question answerer to answer the unanswered question from the potential question answerers based at least in part on the metric analysis. 2 . The method of claim 1 further comprising: providing the unanswered question to the selected question answerer; receiving an answer corresponding to the unanswered question from the selected question answerer; and providing the answer to the question asker. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the one or more potential question answerers comprises identifying the one or more potential question answerers based at least in part on the unanswered question. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the complexity metric comprises determining a complexity metric based at least in part on linguistic characteristics of the unanswered question. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the complexity metric comprises determining the complexity metric based at least in part on a sophistication metric associated with the question asker. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the sophistication metric comprises determining the sophistication metric based at least in part on prior question answering interactions of a respective potential question answerer. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the sophistication metric comprises determining the sophistication metric based at least in part on prior search activity of a respective potential question answerer. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the sophistication metric comprises determining the sophistication metric based at least in part on a knowledge level of a respective potential question answerer in a subject area relevant to the unanswered question. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying one or more potential question answerers comprises identifying the potential question answerers from a social graph. 10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising, for each of the one or more potential question answerers, determining a busyness metric associated with the respective potential question answerer, wherein the metric analysis is further generated based on an analysis of the busyness metric. 11 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising, for each of the one or more potential question answerers, determining a willingness metric associated with the respective potential question answerer, wherein the metric analysis is further generated based on an analysis of the willingness metric. 12 . A system comprising: a storage medium that stores instructions; one or more computers configured to execute the instructions and perform operations comprising: receiving an unanswered question from a question asker; determining a complexity metric associated with the unanswered question based on an attribute of at least one of the question or the question asker; identifying one or more potential question answerers to answer the unanswered question; for each of the one or more potential question answerers, determining a sophistication metric; analyzing at least the sophistication metric and the complexity metric to generate a metric analysis; and selecting a question answerer to answer the unanswered question from the potential question answerers based at least in part on the metric analysis. 13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more computers are configured to perform operations further comprising: providing the unanswered question to the selected question answerer; receiving an answer corresponding to the unanswered question from the selected question answerer; and providing the answer to the question asker. 14 . The system of claim 12 , wherein identifying the one or more potential question answerers comprises identifying the one or more potential question answerers based at least in part on the unanswered question. 15 . The system of claim 12 , wherein determining the complexity metric comprises determining a complexity metric based at least in part on linguistic characteristics of the unanswered question. 16 . The system of claim 12 , wherein determining the complexity metric comprises determining the complexity metric based at least in part on a sophistication metric associated with the question asker. 17 . The system of claim 12 , wherein determining the sophistication metric comprises determining the sophistication metric based at least in part on prior question answering interactions of a respective potential question answerer. 18 . The system of claim 12 , wherein determining the sophistication metric comprises determining the sophistication metric based at least in part on prior search activity of a respective potential question answerer. 19 . The system of claim 12 , wherein determining the sophistication metric comprises determining the sophistication metric based at least in part on a knowledge level of a respective potential question answerer in a subject area relevant to the unanswered question. 20 . The system of claim 12 , wherein identifying one or more potential question answerers comprises identifying the potential question answerers from a social graph. 21 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more computers are configured to perform operations further comprising: for each of the one or more potential question answerers, determining a busyness metric associated with the respective potential question answerer, wherein the metric analysis is further generated based on an analysis of the busyness metric. 22 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more computers are configured to perform operations further comprising: for each of the one or more potential question answerers, determining a willingness metric associated with the respective potential question answerer, wherein the metric analysis is further generated based on an analysis of the willingness metric. 23 - 66 . (canceled)

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Physics · mapped topic

  • Reformulation based on results of preceding query · CPC title

  • Iterative querying; Query formulation based on the results of a preceding query · CPC title

  • using graphical result space presentation or visualisation · CPC title

  • Natural language query formulation · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2016019280A1 cover?
Methods and systems are provided for a question answering. In some implementations, a question is received from a question asker. A complexity metric associated with the question is determined. One or more potential question answerers to answer the question are identified. For each of the one or more potential question answerers, a sophistication metric is determined. At least the sophisticatio…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Google Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F17/30595. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Jan 21 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).