Feasible Tracking Control of Machine
US-2015148924-A1 · May 28, 2015 · US
US2016018797A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016018797-A1 |
| Application number | US-201414523508-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Oct 24, 2014 |
| Priority date | Jul 21, 2014 |
| Publication date | Jan 21, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method includes receiving, at a master model predictive control (MPC) controller from a slave MPC controller, information indicating to what extent the slave MPC controller is able to change multiple manipulated variables in each of multiple directions within a variable space without violating process variable constraints of the slave MPC controller. The method also includes estimating a feasibility region associated with the slave MPC controller using the information, where the feasibility region identifies a portion of the variable space in which combinations of manipulated variable values satisfy the process variable constraints. In addition, the method includes performing plantwide optimization at the master MPC controller using the feasibility region, where a solution generated during the plantwide optimization includes one of the combinations of manipulated variable values within the feasibility region.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method comprising: receiving, at a master model predictive control (MPC) controller from a slave MPC controller, information indicating to what extent the slave MPC controller is able to change multiple manipulated variables in each of multiple directions within a variable space without violating process variable constraints of the slave MPC controller; estimating a feasibility region associated with the slave MPC controller using the information, the feasibility region identifying a portion of the variable space in which combinations of manipulated variable values satisfy the process variable constraints; and performing plantwide optimization at the master MPC controller using the feasibility region, wherein a solution generated during the plantwide optimization includes one of the combinations of manipulated variable values within the feasibility region. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: sending multiple inquiry optimization calls from the master MPC controller to the slave MPC controller; wherein receiving the information comprises receiving proxy limit values from the slave MPC controller in response to the inquiry optimization calls. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein each proxy limit value identifies a maximum distance in one of the directions within the variable space that the slave MPC controller is able to change the manipulated variables without violating the process variable constraints. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the multiple directions are defined with reference to a current operating point associated with the slave MPC controller, the current operating point defining a specified point in the variable space. 5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the multiple directions are evenly spaced around the current operating point associated with the slave MPC controller. 6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: identifying at least one of the multiple directions. 7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein at least one of the multiple directions comprises a direction substantially perpendicular to a linear variable limit associated with the slave MPC controller. 8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: repeating the receiving and identifying steps for multiple slave MPC controllers; wherein the solution generated during the plantwide optimization honors all process variable constraints of all slave MPC controllers. 9 . An apparatus comprising: a master model predictive control (MPC) controller comprising: at least one network interface configured to receive, from a slave MPC controller, information indicating to what extent the slave MPC controller is able to change multiple manipulated variables in each of multiple directions within a variable space without violating process variable constraints of the slave MPC controller; and at least one processing device configured to: estimate a feasibility region associated with the slave MPC controller using the information, the feasibility region identifying a portion of the variable space in which combinations of manipulated variable values satisfy the process variable constraints; and perform plantwide optimization using the feasibility region, wherein a solution generated during the plantwide optimization includes one of the combinations of manipulated variable values within the feasibility region. 10 . The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein: the at least one processing device is further configured to initiate transmission of multiple inquiry optimization calls to the slave MPC controller; and the at least one processing device is configured to receive proxy limit values from the slave MPC controller in response to the inquiry optimization calls. 11 . The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein each proxy limit value identifies a maximum distance in one of the directions within the variable space that the slave MPC controller is able to change the manipulated variables without violating the process variable constraints. 12 . The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the multiple directions are defined with reference to a current operating point associated with the slave MPC controller, the current operating point defining a specified point in the variable space. 13 . The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the multiple directions are evenly spaced around the current operating point associated with the slave MPC controller. 14 . The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the at least one processing device is further configured to identify at least one of the multiple directions. 15 . The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein at least one of the multiple directions comprises a direction substantially perpendicular to a linear variable limit associated with the slave MPC controller. 16 . The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein: the at least one processing device is further configured to repeat the receiving and identifying operations for multiple slave MPC controllers; and the solution generated during the plantwide optimization honors all process variable constraints of all slave MPC controllers. 17 . A non-transitory computer readable medium embodying a computer program, the computer program comprising computer readable program code for: receiving, at a master model predictive control (MPC) controller from a slave MPC controller, information indicating to what extent the slave MPC controller is able to change multiple manipulated variables in each of multiple directions within a variable space without violating process variable constraints of the slave MPC controller; estimating a feasibility region associated with the slave MPC controller using the information, the feasibility region identifying a portion of the variable space in which combinations of manipulated variable values satisfy the process variable constraints; and performing plantwide optimization at the master MPC controller using the feasibility region, wherein a solution generated during the plantwide optimization includes one of the combinations of manipulated variable values within the feasibility region. 18 . The computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein: the computer program further comprises computer readable program code for sending multiple inquiry optimization calls from the master MPC controller to the slave MPC controller, the information comprising proxy limit values from the slave MPC controller in response to the inquiry optimization calls; and each proxy limit value identifies a maximum distance in one of the directions within the variable space that the slave MPC controller is able to change the manipulated variables without violating the process variable constraints. 19 . The computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein: the multiple directions are defined with reference to a current operating point associated with the slave MPC controller, the current operating point defining a specified point in the variable space; and the computer program further comprises computer readable program code for identifying at least one of the multiple directions. 20 . The computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein: the computer program further comprises computer readable program code for repeating the receiving and identifying operations for multiple slave MPC controllers; and the solution generated during the plantwide optimization honors all process variable constraints of all slave MPC controllers.
using a predictor · CPC title
in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network (software deployment G06F8/60; multiprogramming arrangements G06F9/46) · CPC title
comprising distributed management centres cooperatively managing the network · CPC title
characterised by the purposes of a change of settings, e.g. optimising configuration for enhancing reliability (for optimising operational conditions of wireless networks H04W24/02) · CPC title
involving simulating, designing, planning or modelling of a network · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.