System and method for cell levitation and monitoring
US-2024361343-A1 · Oct 31, 2024 · US
US2016010137A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016010137-A1 |
| Application number | US-201314770866-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Mar 19, 2013 |
| Priority date | Mar 19, 2013 |
| Publication date | Jan 14, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Procedures are provided to evaluate the effectiveness of slow-acting antibacterial agents such as metal salts on reduction of bacterial oral biofilm. In the modified process, the exposure time of the agent is increased from the usual 3 minutes to 7-15 minutes, e.g., about 10 minutes, and the duration increased to 5-12 days, e.g., about 8 days instead of the conventional 3 days.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1 . A method of measuring the efficacy of a test composition against oral bacterial biofilm formation, comprising a) Coating a sample selected from a tooth section and a hydroxyapatite disc with saliva and placing the sample in a flow of a buffered medium, with temperature, flow and pH adjusted to approximate conditions in the mouth; b) Exposing the sample to a test composition, then reinstating the flow of buffered medium, wherein the period of exposure to a test compound is from 7-15 minutes; c) Repeating the preceding step from one to four times per day for 5-12 days; d) Vortexing the sample in anaerobic media to obtain a suspension and measuring the optical density thereof, wherein the optical density is a measure of the degree of bacterial growth. 2 . The method of claim 1 wherein the period of exposure the sample to a test composition in step b) is for a period of about 10 minutes. 3 . The method of claim 1 wherein the step of repeating step b) is carried out from one to four times per day for about 8 days. 4 . The method of claim 1 wherein the buffered medium comprises nutrients as required to support bacterial growth. 5 . The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of culturing the suspension on a solid media and counting the number of colony forming units after a period of 2-5 days, wherein the number of colony forming units is a measure of the degree of bacterial growth. 6 . The method of claim 5 wherein the culture on solid media is carried out in the presence of a metal salt which reacts with volatile sulfur compounds formed in steps a-c to form a black precipitate. 7 . The method of claim 6 wherein the solid media is an agar plate and the metal salt is lead acetate. 8 . The method of claim 6 wherein any black colony forming units are counted independently from the other colony forming units and wherein the number of black colony forming units corresponds to the degree of growth of bacteria which produce volatile sulfur compounds. 9 . The method of any preceding claim 1 wherein the test composition is an oral care product. 10 . The method of claim 1 wherein the test composition comprises at least 0.1% of a metal ion having a valence of +2 or +3. 11 . The method of claim 1 wherein metal ion having a valence of +2 or +3 is Zn 2+ .
Testing for antimicrobial activity of a material · CPC title
involved in periodontal diseases · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.