Method and system for reducing localized artifacts in imaging data

US2016007948A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2016007948-A1
Application numberUS-201314377202-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateFeb 18, 2013
Priority dateFeb 22, 2012
Publication dateJan 14, 2016
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A method and system for reducing localized artifacts in imaging data, such as motion artifacts and bone streak artifacts, are provided. The method includes segmenting the imaging data to identify one or more suspect regions in the imaging data near which localized artifacts are expected to occur, defining an artifact-containing region of interest in the imaging data around each suspect region, and applying a local bias field within the artifact-containing regions to correct for the localized artifacts.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

1 . A method for reducing localized artifacts in imaging data, the method comprising: segmenting the imaging data to identify one or more suspect regions in the imaging data near which localized artifacts are expected to occur; defining an artifact-containing region of interest in the imaging data around each suspect region; defining one or more classes for the imaging data of the artifact-containing regions of interest, and associating each class with at least one representative imaging value; assigning each item of imaging data within the artifact-containing regions to one of the classes; determining local bias field within the artifact-containing regions describing, for each item of imaging data within the artifact-containing regions, a difference between a calculated imaging value and the representative imaging value based on the classification; and applying the local bias field to the imaging data within the artifact-containing regions to produce art artifact-corrected imaging data. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the imaging data comprises a reconstructed imaging data. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the segmentation step comprises an application of one or more thresholds to the imaging data. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein at least one inner boundary of each artifact containing region is defined as an outer boundary of a suspect region. 5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein an outer boundary of each artifact-containing region is defined by a region growing technique starting at the inner boundary as a seed point, and applying a stopping criterion. 6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the stopping criterion comprises a normal range of values for imaging data which surround the suspect region. 7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising at least two classes for the imaging data of the artifact-containing regions of interest, defined by mutually exclusive minimum and maximum class values. 8 . The method of claim 7 , further comprising defining a number of the classes and the minimum and maximum class values before the imaging data is acquired ( 204 ). 9 . The method of claim 7 , further comprising defining a number of the classes and the minimum and maximum class values at least in part by analyzing the imaging data. 10 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the artifact-containing region classification comprises a first lowest value class, a second medium value class, and a third high value class. 11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the representative imaging value is a single value, and the local bias field identifies a difference between the calculated imaging value and the representative imaging value. 12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the representative imaging values are a range of values defined between a minimum value and a maximum value, and the local bias field is defined as zero if the calculated imaging value falls within the range, or otherwise as a difference between the calculated imaging value and the maximum value or the minimum value of the range. 13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the local bias field determination comprises a smoothing step that favors a smoothness of the local bias field and reduces noise. 14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the localized artifacts comprise motion artifacts, and the suspect regions correspond to imaged objects which are suspected to cause motion artifacts. 15 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a notification that the imaging data may contain the localized artifacts. 16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the notification comprises an identification of one or more regions within the imaging data which may be corrupted by localized artifacts. 17 . An image processing system comprising logic stored on a memory, wherein the logic provides instructions for reducing localized artifacts in imaging data, the instructions comprising: segmenting the imaging data to identify one or more suspect regions in the imaging data near which localized artifacts are expected to occur; defining an artifact-containing region of interest in the imaging data around each suspect region; defining one or more classes for the imaging data of the artifact-containing regions of interest, and associating each class with at least one representative imaging value; assigning each item of imaging data within the artifact-containing regions to one of the classes; determining a local bias field within the artifact-containing regions describing, for each item of imaging data within the artifact-containing regions, a difference between a calculated imaging value and the representative imaging value based on the classification; and applying the local bias field to the imaging data within the artifact-containing regions to produce an artifact-corrected imaging data. 18 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the imaging data comprises a reconstructed imaging data. 19 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the segmentation step comprises an application of one or more thresholds to the imaging data. 20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein at least one inner boundary of each artifact-confining region is defined as an outer boundary of a suspect region. 21 . The system of claim 20 , wherein an outer boundary of each artifact containing region is defined by a region growing technique starting at the inner boundary as a seed point, and applying a stopping criterion. 22 . The system of claim 21 , wherein the stopping criterion comprises a normal range of values for imaging data which surround the suspect region. 23 . The system of claim 17 , further comprising at least two classes for the imaging data of the artifact-containing regions of interest, defined by mutually exclusive minimum and maximum class values. 24 . The system of claim 23 , further comprising defining a number of the classes and the minimum and maximum class values before the imaging data is acquired ( 204 ). 25 . The system of claim 23 , further comprising defining a number of the classes and the minimum and maximum class values at least in part by analyzing the imaging data. 26 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the artifact-containing region classification comprises a first lowest value class, a second medium value class, and a third high value class. 27 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the representative imaging value is a single value, and the local bias field identifies a difference between the calculated imaging value and the representative imagine value. 28 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the representative imaging values are a range of values defined between a minimum value and a maximum value, and the local bias field is defined as zero if the calculated imaging value falls within the range, or otherwise as a difference between the calculated imaging value and the maximum value or the minimum value of the range. 29 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the local bias field determination comprises a smoothing step that favors a smoothness of the local bias field and reduces noise. 30 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the localized artifacts comprise motion artifacts, and the suspect regions correspond to imaged objects which are suspected to cause motion artifacts. 31 . The system of claim 17 , further comprising providing a notification

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • using feature-based methods, e.g. the tracking of corners or segments · CPC title

  • involving region growing; involving region merging; involving connected component labelling · CPC title

  • Bone · CPC title

  • Computed x-ray tomography [CT] · CPC title

  • Arrangements for interfacing with the operator or the patient · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2016007948A1 cover?
A method and system for reducing localized artifacts in imaging data, such as motion artifacts and bone streak artifacts, are provided. The method includes segmenting the imaging data to identify one or more suspect regions in the imaging data near which localized artifacts are expected to occur, defining an artifact-containing region of interest in the imaging data around each suspect region, …
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Koninkl Philips Nv
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification A61B6/5264. Mapped technology areas include Human Necessities.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Jan 14 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).