Location of a distress beacon

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2016003933-A1
Application number	US-201514789767-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Jul 1, 2015
Priority date	Jul 4, 2014
Publication date	Jan 7, 2016
Grant date	—

Abstract

There is disclosed a computer implemented method for processing the signal emitted by a distress beacon, the signal being received by several satellites and forwarded to at least one ground station, the method comprising the steps consisting in determining a set of hypothetical positions of the beacon, and for at least one of the hypothetical positions, for each satellite, offsetting the signal received and forwarded as a function of the hypothetical position; summing the offset signals; and evaluating the validity of the sum of the offset signals as a function of the presence of a predefined characteristic in the sum. Developments describe aspects such as the temporal and/or frequency offsetting, the construction of a digital replica of the signal transmitted by the beacon, and as the minimizing of the weighted residues of the offsets. System aspects are described, including the calibration of an active antenna or an array of antennas.

First claim

1 . A method implemented by a computer for processing the signal emitted by a distress beacon, said signal being received by several satellites and forwarded to at least one ground station, the method comprising the steps:
determining a set of hypothetical positions of the distress beacon; and for at least one of the hypothetical positions: for each satellite, offsetting the signal received and forwarded as a function of said hypothetical position; summing the offset signals by coherent integration; and evaluating the validity of the sum of the offset signals as a function of the presence of a predefined characteristic in said sum.

2 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , the step consisting in offsetting the signal from one satellite comprising a step consisting in offsetting the signal from said satellite temporally by a time that is equal to the opposite of the beacon-satellite-station propagation time.

3 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , the step consisting in offsetting the signal from one satellite comprising a step consisting in offsetting the signal from the satellite in terms of frequency by a frequency equal to the opposite of the Doppler effect.

4 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , the step consisting in offsetting the signal from a satellite comprising a step consisting in offsetting the signal in terms of power by a power equal to the opposite of the power attenuation measured for said satellite.

5 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , for which a characteristic of the transmitted signal comprises the presence of a pure carrier, and in which the validity of the sum of the offset signals from the satellites is determined by the appearance of a line in the Fourier transform of the summed signal.

6 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , for which the signal transmitted further comprises the presence of a synchronization signal, and for which the validity of the sum of the offset signals from the satellites is determined by correlation between the summed signal and a replica of said synchronization signal.

7 . The method as claimed in claim 6 , for which correlation is obtained for a particular temporal and frequency offset between said signal obtained by summing the offset signals from the satellites and said replica of the synchronization word.

8 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , a characteristic of the emitted signal being obtained by combining an initial message and a spread code, and the validity of the sum of the offset signals from the satellites being determined by correlation between the summed signal and a replica of the spread code.

9 . The method as claimed in claim 8 , the correlation being determined for a particular temporal and frequency offset between the summed signal and the replica of the spread code.

10 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising, for each satellite, a step consisting in determining a time offset and a frequency offset that maximize the correlation between the signal received from this satellite and the summed signal corresponding to the sum of the offset signals from the satellites that is determined as being valid.

11 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising, for each sum of offset signals from the satellites which is determined as being valid, a step consisting in determining the binary content of the signal transmitted by the beacon, relayed by the satellites and received by the station.

12 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising, for each sum of offset signals from the satellites which is determined as being valid, after the step consisting in determining the binary content of the signal transmitted by the beacon, a step consisting in constructing a baseband digital replica of the signal transmitted by the distress beacon.

13 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising, for each satellite, a step consisting in determining a time offset and a frequency offset that maximize the correlation between the signal received from this satellite and the digital replica after a step consisting in demodulating the coherent composition.

14 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising a step consisting in determining the location of the distress beacon, said location minimizing the weighted residue of the time offsets or the weighted residue of the frequency offsets, or the combined weighted residue of the time offsets and of the frequency offsets between the satellites.

15 . The method as claimed in claim 14 , further comprising a step consisting in calibrating an active antenna or an array of antennas as a function of the location of the distress beacon.

16 . The method as claimed in claim 11 , further comprising a step consisting in creating an alert bulletin comprising the demodulated content of the signal transmitted by the beacon and/or the determined location of the distress beacon.

17 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , comprising beforehand a step consisting in removing the contribution of the downlink between the satellite and the ground station or stations.

18 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , the set of hypothetical positions of the distress beacon being reduced to the positions visible from the satellites visible from the ground receiving station.

19 . A computer program product, said computer program comprising code instructions for carrying out the steps of the method as claimed in claim 1 when said program is executed on a computer.

20 . A system for locating a distress beacon, the system comprising means for implementing the steps of the method as claimed in claim 1 .

21 . The system as claimed in claim 20 , comprising at least one active antenna or an array of antennas.

Assignees

• Thales Sa
• Centre Nat Etd Spatiales

Inventors

• Calmettes Thibaud Pierre Jean
• Petcu Emanuela Ana Maria
• Gregoire Yoan

Classifications

• G01S5/0231

  Emergency, distress or locator beacons · CPC title

• G01S5/0072 Primary

  Transmission between mobile stations, e.g. anti-collision systems · CPC title

• G01S19/17

  Emergency applications · CPC title

• G01S19/42

  Determining position · CPC title

• G01S5/06

  Position of source determined by co-ordinating a plurality of position lines defined by path-difference measurements (G01S5/12 takes precedence) · CPC title