System and Method for Modeling and Design of Pulse Fracturing Networks

US2016003019A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2016003019-A1
Application numberUS-201414322516-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateJul 2, 2014
Priority dateJul 2, 2014
Publication dateJan 7, 2016
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Systems and methods for analyzing and designing a customized pulse fracturing operation for fracturing a wellbore in a reservoir formation are disclosed. Pulsed fracturing can create multiple fractures that radiate away from the wellbore while minimizing near wellbore damage. This network can further be extended into the reservoir by utilizing an optimized pumping rate over a predetermined amount of time. The optimized pulse rate and duration can be determined by using a geomechanical and a reservoir simulator which can help in quantifying the production efficiency of the induced fracture network.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1 . A non-transitory program storage device, readable by a processor and comprising instructions stored thereon to cause one or more processors to: receive a plurality of input parameters, each input parameter relating to a wellbore in a reservoir formation; develop a rate and pressure dependent failure model based on the received input parameters; and simulate propagation of a pulse fracturing network in the reservoir formation by applying one or more pulse fracturing techniques to maximize fracture network extent while minimizing near wellbore damage. 2 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 3 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting tensile failure. 4 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting compactive failure. 5 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting shear failure. 6 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to create a customized pulse fracturing operation based on the simulation. 7 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 6 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse rise period using formation specific material properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 8 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 6 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse peak using formation specific material properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 9 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 6 , wherein the customized fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized number of pulse cycles using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 10 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the input parameters comprise at least one of Young's Modulus, Poisson's ratio, porous rock density, rock gain density, unconfined compressive strength, cohesion, internal friction angle, formation anisotropy, and natural fracture characteristics. 11 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to predict a fracture potential of a reservoir formation under pulse fracturing application. 12 . The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the input parameters are ranked and weighted. 13 . A method for designing a pulse fracturing operation, the method comprising: receiving a plurality of input parameters, each input parameter relating to a wellbore in a reservoir formation; developing a rate and pressure dependent failure model based on the received input parameters; and simulating propagation of a pulse fracturing network in the reservoir formation by applying one or more pulse fracturing techniques to maximize fracture network extent while minimizing near wellbore damage. 14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting tensile failure. 16 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting compactive failure. 17 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting shear failure. 18 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising creating a customized pulse fracturing operation based on the simulation. 19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse rise period using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse peak using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 21 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized number of pulse cycles using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 22 . The method of claim 19 , further comprising performing the customized pulse fracturing operation on the wellbore. 23 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the input parameters comprise at least one of Young's Modulus, Poisson's ratio, porous rock density, rock gain density, unconfined compressive strength, cohesion, internal friction angle, formation anisotropy, and natural fracture characteristics. 24 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising predicting a fracture potential of the wellbore under pulse fracturing application. 25 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the input parameters are ranked and weighted. 26 . A system, comprising: a memory; a display device; and a processor operatively coupled to the memory and the display device and adapted to execute program code stored in the memory to: receive a plurality of input parameters, each input parameter relating to a wellbore in a reservoir formation; develop a rate and pressure dependent failure model based on the received input parameters; and simulate propagation of a pulse fracturing fracture network in a reservoir formation by applying one or more pulse fracturing techniques to maximize fracture network extent while minimizing near wellbore damage. 27 . The system of claim 26 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 28 . The system of claim 26 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting tensile failure. 29 . The system of claim 26 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting compactive failure. 30 . The system of claim 26 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting shear failure. 31 . The system of claim 26 , further comprising creating a customized pulse fracturing operation based on the simulation. 32 . The system of claim 31 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse rise period using formation specific material properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 33 . The system of claim 31 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse peak using formation specific material properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 34 . The system of claim 31 , wherein the customized fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized number of pulse cycles using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces. 35 . The system of claim 31 , further comprising initiating performance of the customized pulse fracturing operation on the wellbore. 36 . The system of claim 26 , wherein the input parameters comprise at least one of Young's Modulus, Poisson's ratio, porous rock density, rock gain density, unconfined

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • G06F30/28Primary

    using fluid dynamics, e.g. using Navier-Stokes equations or computational fluid dynamics [CFD] · CPC title

  • E21B43/26Primary

    by forming crevices or fractures · CPC title

  • Measuring wall stresses in the borehole · CPC title

  • Vibration generating arrangements for boreholes or wells, e.g. for stimulating production ({for fishing for or freeing objects E21B31/005;} for transmitting measuring-signals E21B47/14; for geophysical measurements G01V1/02) · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2016003019A1 cover?
Systems and methods for analyzing and designing a customized pulse fracturing operation for fracturing a wellbore in a reservoir formation are disclosed. Pulsed fracturing can create multiple fractures that radiate away from the wellbore while minimizing near wellbore damage. This network can further be extended into the reservoir by utilizing an optimized pumping rate over a predetermined amou…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Weatherford Lamb
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F30/28. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Jan 07 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).