Deepfake detection using synchronous observations of machine learning residuals
US-2024127630-A1 · Apr 18, 2024 · US
US12596702B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12596702-B1 |
| Application number | US-202418615898-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Mar 25, 2024 |
| Priority date | Mar 25, 2024 |
| Publication date | Apr 7, 2026 |
| Grant date | Apr 7, 2026 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The disclosure includes a system and method for extracting, using one or more processors, metadata from a first media file, wherein the metadata is distinct from media content; encoding, using the one or more processors, a first portion of the metadata extracted from the first media file into a first metadata-encoded media signature; and determining, using the one or more processors, whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is indicative a defect.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method comprising: extracting, using one or more processors, metadata from a first media file, wherein the metadata is distinct from media content; encoding, using the one or more processors, a first portion of the metadata extracted from the first media file into a first metadata-encoded media signature; and determining, using the one or more processors, whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is indicative of a defect including one or more of: an intra-transaction analysis determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is consistent with a second metadata-encoded media signature associated with a second media file, wherein the first media file and second media file are associated with a common transaction; and an inter-transaction analysis determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is consistent with a third metadata-encoded media signature associated with a third media file, wherein the third media file is associate with a prior transaction. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is indicative of the defect comprises an intra-media analysis including one or more of: determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature indicates an inconsistency between two or more metadata values, wherein each of the two or more metadata values are associated with a different set of metadata associated with the first media file but include an informational overlap; and determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature indicates an absence of expected metadata. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the different metadata sets include at least one from a group of: exchangeable image file format (EXIF) metadata, extensible metadata platform (XMP) metadata, International Press Telecommunications Council (IPTC) metadata, International Color Consortium (ICC) Profile metadata, comment metadata, and thumbnail metadata. 4 . The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising: obtaining one or more of the second metadata-encoded media signature associated with the second media file and the third metadata-encoded media signature associated with the third media file. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is indicative of the defect includes one or more of: cross-referencing the first metadata-encoded media signature to determine whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is consistent with a representative signature generated via aggregation; cross-referencing the first metadata-encoded media signature against one or more values within, or derived from, the media content; and cross-referencing the first metadata-encoded media signature against source information. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first metadata-encoded media signature includes a vector representation, the first metadata-encoded media signature encoding one or more metadata fields that are present or absent from the metadata. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first metadata-encoded media signature includes encoded values associated with present metadata field. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the encoding includes one or more of a weighted and proximity encoding. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the media content is image-based and includes pixel data associated with one of at least one video frame and a still image. 10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first metadata-encoded media signature includes a graphical representation, the first metadata-encoded media signature encoding one or more metadata fields that are present or absent from the metadata. 11 . A system comprising: a processor; and a memory, the memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the system to: extract metadata from a first media file, wherein the metadata is distinct from media content; encode a first portion of the metadata extracted from the first media file into a first metadata-encoded media signature; and determine whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is indicative of a defect including one or more of: an intra-transaction analysis determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is consistent with a second metadata-encoded media signature associated with a second media file, wherein the first media file and second media file are associated with a common transaction; and an inter-transaction analysis determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is consistent with a third metadata-encoded media signature associated with a third media file, wherein the third media file is associate with a prior transaction. 12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is indicative of the defect comprises an intra-media analysis including one or more of: determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature indicates an inconsistency between two or more metadata values, wherein each of the two or more metadata values are associated with a different set of metadata associated with the first media file but include an informational overlap; and determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature indicates an absence of expected metadata. 13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the different metadata sets include at least one from a group of: exchangeable image file format (EXIF) metadata, extensible metadata platform (XMP) metadata, International Press Telecommunications Council (IPTC) metadata, International Color Consortium (ICC) Profile metadata, comment metadata, and thumbnail metadata. 14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the instruction, when executed, further cause the system to: obtain one or more of the second metadata-encoded media signature associated with the second media file and the third metadata-encoded media signature associated with the third media file. 15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein determining whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is indicative of the defect includes one or more of: cross-referencing the first metadata-encoded media signature to determine whether the first metadata-encoded media signature is consistent with a representative signature generated via aggregation; cross-referencing the first metadata-encoded media signature against one or more values within, or derived from, the media content; and cross-referencing the first metadata-encoded media signature against source information. 16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first metadata-encoded media signature includes a vector representation, the first metadata-encoded media signature encoding one or more metadata fields that are present or absent from the metadata. 17 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first metadata-encoded media signature includes encoded values associated with present metadata field. 18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the encoding includes one or more of a weighted and proximity encoding. 19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the media content is image-based and includes pixel data associated with one of at least one video frame and a still image. 20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first metadata-encoded media signature includes a graphical representation, the first metadata-encoded media signature encoding one or more metadata fields that are present or absent from the metadata.
using metadata automatically derived from the content · CPC title
Ensuring data consistency and integrity · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.