System and computerized method for adjusting machine capabilities in response to machine operating conditions
US-2020048866-A1 · Feb 13, 2020 · US
US12563451B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12563451-B2 |
| Application number | US-202318309242-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 28, 2023 |
| Priority date | Apr 28, 2023 |
| Publication date | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Grant date | Feb 24, 2026 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods and systems for managing methods of communication used by data processing systems throughout a distributed environment are disclosed. To manage methods of communication, a system may include a communication manager and one or more data processing systems. The communication manager may monitor use of an existing method of communication by a data processing system over time. If characteristics of the existing method of communication do not meet criteria specified by a communication requirement, the communication manager may determine whether to update the existing method of communication. To do so, the communication manager may host and operate a digital twin of the data processing system and may simulate operation of the data processing system using other methods of communication using the digital twin. If one of the other methods of communication has characteristics that meet the communication requirement, the communication manager may update the existing method of communication.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method of managing communications between data processing systems throughout a distributed environment by a communication manager, the method comprising: identifying a change in use of an existing method of communication by a data processing system of the data processing systems; obtaining communication system performance data for the data processing system in response to the change in the use, the communication system performance data comprising characteristics of the existing method of communication; making a determination, based on the communication system performance data and the change in the use, regarding whether future use of the existing method of communication will meet a communication requirement for the data processing system; in an instance of the determination in which the future use of the existing method of communication does not meet the communication requirement: identifying a remedial action set using a digital twin of the data processing system to identify a potential update to the existing method of communication, the potential update being intended to bring the existing method of communication into compliance with the communication requirement; and initiating performance of the remedial action set. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristics of the existing method of communication comprise at least one selected from a list consisting of: a quantification of energy consumption by the data processing system; a rate of data transmission; a quantification of reliability of data transmission; a quantification of latency of data transmission; and a range of data transmission. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the communication requirement comprises a criterion for a characteristic of the characteristics of the existing method of communication that delineates whether the communication requirement is met. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein identifying the remedial action set comprises: obtaining simulated communication system performance data generated by the digital twin for the potential update; and comparing the simulated communication system performance data to the criterion to identify whether the potential update is likely to bring the existing method of communication into compliance with the communication requirement; and in an instance of the comparing where the potential update is likely to bring the existing method of communication into compliance with the communication requirement: identifying the potential update for implementation. 5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein identifying the remedial action set further comprises: sequentially evaluating other potential updates using the digital twin until the criterion is met. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein initiating performance of the remedial action set comprises: reallocating, based on the potential update, a first communication channel to support the change in the use; and reallocating, based on the potential update, a second communication channel that does not support the change in the use. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the change in the use is a higher reporting rate due to a data drift in measurement samples by a sensor, the higher reporting rate requiring a higher communication bandwidth for the existing method of communication. 8 . A non-transitory machine-readable medium having instructions stored therein, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations for managing communications between data processing systems throughout a distributed environment by a communication manager, the operations comprising: identifying a change in use of an existing method of communication by a data processing system of the data processing systems; obtaining communication system performance data for the data processing system in response to the change in the use, the communication system performance data comprising characteristics of the existing method of communication; making a determination, based on the communication system performance data and the change in the use, regarding whether future use of the existing method of communication will meet a communication requirement for the data processing system; in an instance of the determination in which the future use of the existing method of communication does not meet the communication requirement: identifying a remedial action set using a digital twin of the data processing system to identify a potential update to the existing method of communication, the potential update being intended to bring the existing method of communication into compliance with the communication requirement; and initiating performance of the remedial action set. 9 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the characteristics of the existing method of communication comprise at least one selected from a list consisting of: a quantification of energy consumption by the data processing system; a rate of data transmission; a quantification of reliability of data transmission; a quantification of latency of data transmission; and a range of data transmission. 10 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the communication requirement comprises a criterion for a characteristic of the characteristics of the existing method of communication that delineates whether the communication requirement is met. 11 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein identifying the remedial action set comprises: obtaining simulated communication system performance data generated by the digital twin for the potential update; and comparing the simulated communication system performance data to the criterion to identify whether the potential update is likely to bring the existing method of communication into compliance with the communication requirement; and in an instance of the comparing where the potential update is likely to bring the existing method of communication into compliance with the communication requirement: identifying the potential update for implementation. 12 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein identifying the remedial action set further comprises: sequentially evaluating other potential updates using the digital twin until the criterion is met. 13 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein initiating performance of the remedial action set comprises: reallocating, based on the potential update, a first communication channel to support the change in the use; and reallocating, based on the potential update, a second communication channel that does not support the change in the use. 14 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the change in the use is a higher reporting rate due to a data drift in measurement samples by a sensor, the higher reporting rate requiring a higher communication bandwidth for the existing method of communication. 15 . A data processing system, comprising: a processor; and a memory coupled to the processor to store instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations for managing communications between data processing systems throughout a distributed environment by a communication manager, the operations comprising: identifying a change in use of an existing method of communication by a data processing system of the data processing systems; obtaining communication system performance data for the data processing system in response to the change in the use, the communication sys
Measuring or estimating channel quality parameters · CPC title
Modelling the propagation channel · CPC title
Scheduling measurement reports {; Arrangements for measurement reports} · CPC title
Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters · CPC title
involving simulating, designing, planning or modelling of a network · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.