Adaptive network security using zero trust microsegmentation

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-12556586-B2
Application number	US-202418620699-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Mar 28, 2024
Priority date	Apr 24, 2023
Publication date	Feb 17, 2026
Grant date	Feb 17, 2026

Abstract

Zero trust and micro-segmentation techniques may be collectively used to enhance network security. To establish, refine, and enforce a zero-trust least-privileged policy, the network may be segmented to put each device of the network into a respective network of one, which forces all network traffic to pass through a zero-trust gatekeeper. The gatekeeper may then monitor and analyze the traffic to establish, refine, and enforce the zero-trust least-privileged policy, which reduces network access to only a limited set of network actions and/or paths. Using the gatekeeper, network traffic may be monitored to progressively establish the policy as well as to continually refine the policy. Recommended actions may be determined based on the analysis of the monitored network traffic and provided to the user to allow user feedback on the communication rules of zero-trust policy.

First claim

We claim:

1 . A zero-trust microsegmentation method comprising:
determining, based on information associated with devices of a network, a zero-trust security policy in which communication permissions for the devices of the network are denied by default unless otherwise allowed, each device of the network being a respective network-of-one causing all device traffic to traverse a gatekeeper configured as a default gateway for the devices; and iteratively performing:
analyzing network traffic under the zero-trust security policy;
adapting the zero-trust security policy, based on the analysis of the network traffic, to adjust the communication permissions by modifying a communication dimension to provide the zero-trust security policy including one or more modifications to the communication permissions; and
implementing the zero-trust security policy including the one or more modifications to the communication permissions.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, the one or more communication dimensions includes an internet-intranet dimension defining a restrictiveness distinction between internet traffic and intranet traffic.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, the one or more communication dimensions includes an input-output dimension defining a restrictiveness distinction between input traffic and output traffic.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, the one or more communication dimensions includes a segment dimension defining a restrictiveness distinction between inter-segment traffic and intra-segment traffic.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, the one or more communication dimensions includes a port dimension defining a port-based traffic restrictiveness distinction.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, the one or more communication dimensions includes a path dimension defining a communication path-based traffic restrictiveness distinction.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, the one or more communication dimensions includes a user dimension defining a user-based traffic restrictiveness distinction and/or a user group-based traffic restrictiveness distinction.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, the one or more communication dimensions includes: an inter-group dimension defining an inter-group traffic restrictiveness distinction, and/or an intra-group dimension defining an intra-group traffic restrictiveness distinction.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, the one or more communication dimensions includes an application dimension defining an application-based traffic restrictiveness distinction.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein adapting the zero-trust security policy comprises progressively increasing a restrictiveness of one or more of the communication permissions for the zero-trust security policy to provide the zero-trust security policy including the one or more modifications to the communication permissions.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein adapting the zero-trust security policy comprises adjusting a degree of enforcement of the communication permissions.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising continually observing denied network traffic and providing a notification of the denied network traffic to a user, wherein feedback is receivable in response to the notification.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein one or more of the devices of the network comprise a respective local zero-trust agent configured to provide zero-trust least-privilege network management.

14 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the internet traffic is subject to more restrictions than intranet traffic.

15 . An apparatus comprising:
one or more processors; and a memory for storing computer readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the apparatus to:
determine, based on information associated with devices of a network, a zero-trust security policy in which communication permissions for the devices of the network are denied by default unless otherwise allowed, each device of the network being a respective network-of-one configured to cause all device traffic to traverse a gatekeeper configured as a default gateway for the devices; and
iteratively:
analyze network traffic under the zero-trust security policy; and

adapt the zero-trust security policy, based on the analysis of the network traffic, to adjust the communication permissions by modifying a communication dimension to provide the zero-trust security policy including one or more modifications to the communication permissions, wherein the gatekeeper is configured to apply the zero-trust security policy to the device traffic traversing the gatekeeper.

16 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, based on the information associated with one or more devices of the network, a plurality of network microsegments, wherein one or more of the plurality of network microsegments comprises at least one of the devices within the respective network-of-one.

17 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising analyzing, by the gatekeeper, the device traffic traversing the gatekeeper to determine the information associated with the devices.

18 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising applying, by the gatekeeper, the zero-trust security policy to the device traffic traversing the gatekeeper.

19 . The method of claim 1 , wherein establishing each device as a respective network-of-one comprises: assigning an individualized subnet to each device, wherein the individualized subnets cause all of the device traffic to traverse the gatekeeper.

20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein assigning the individualized subnet comprises assigning a /32 subnet or a 255.255.255.255 subnet mask to each device.

Assignees

• Colortokens Inc

Inventors

• Akali Harish
• Tyagi Satyam
• Owen Wyn
• Kollimarla Surya
• Khazanchi Rajesh

Classifications

• H04L63/0263 Primary

  Rule management · CPC title

• H04L63/1425

  Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection · CPC title

• H04L63/0227

  Filtering policies (mail message filtering H04L51/212) · CPC title

• H04L63/205

  involving negotiation or determination of the one or more network security mechanisms to be used, e.g. by negotiation between the client and the server or between peers or by selection according to the capabilities of the entities involved (negotiation of communication capabilities H04L69/24) · CPC title

• H04L63/0236

  Filtering by address, protocol, port number or service, e.g. IP-address or URL · CPC title