Method for determining a treatment schedule for treating a field

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-12536480-B2
Application number	US-202218271770-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jan 13, 2022
Priority date	Jan 14, 2021
Publication date	Jan 27, 2026
Grant date	Jan 27, 2026

Abstract

Computer-implemented method for generating control data configured to be used or usable in an agricultural equipment for treating a field, comprising the following steps: (S 10 ) providing crop data, wherein the crop data comprise information about an agricultural crop species providing crop data grown or sown or planned to be grown or sown in a field; (S 20 ) providing field data, wherein the field data comprise information about the field; (S 30 )—optionally—providing historic treatment data, (S 40 )—optionally—providing environmental data, (S 50 ) at least based on the crop data and on the field data, initiating and/or performing data processing in at least one database and/or database system, (S 60 ) determining the organism-specific risk based on the result of the data processing, (S 70 ) providing and/or determining the organism-specific threshold, (S 80 ) determining, based on the organism-specific risk and the organism-specific threshold and based on the data processing in at least one treatment-related database, at least two treatment schedules capable of targeting the at least one organism, (S 90 ) ranking the at least two treatment schedules, based on one or more of the specific statistics (Q 1 ) to (Q 28 ): (S 100 ) outputting the ranked list of the at least two treatment schedules, (S 110 ) generating control data configured to be used or usable in an agricultural equipment, wherein the control data is based on the highest ranked treatment schedule from the ranked list, or a treatment schedule selected by a user from the ranked list.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1 . A method performed by a computing device for generating control data to operate an agricultural equipment for treating a field, the method comprising:
receiving, by a processing unit, crop data comprising information about an agricultural crop species grown or sown or planned intended to be grown in a field; receiving field data information about the field; optionally receiving historic treatment data, wherein the historic treatment data comprise information about historic presence of an organism in the field or in a geographic region in which the field is located in the field, about treatment time, treatment-related parameters, organism control rate of treatments occurring or planned in the past; optionally receiving environmental data, wherein the environmental data comprise information about weather, soil, crop stress, biodiversity requirements, regulatory data, and other environmental factors; at least based on the crop data and on the field data, initiating and/or performing data processing, using a multi-source data integration model configured to generate a spatially-resolved, time-dependent risk prediction for at least one harmful organism, in at least one database and/or database system containing:
(i) data related to the crop data,
(ii) data related to the field data,
(iii) optionally data related to the historic treatment data, and
(iv) optionally data related to the environmental data,
determining, by the computing device, an organism-specific risk based on a result of the data processing, wherein the organism-specific risk is a time-related occurrence probability of at least one organism present or expected to be present in a specific field; providing and/or determining an organism-specific threshold, wherein the organism-specific threshold is a reference value of the organism-specific risk and wherein at least one treatment is required in case the organism-specific risk exceeds the organism-specific threshold; determining, based on the organism-specific risk and the organism-specific threshold and based on the data processing in at least one treatment-related database, at least two treatment schedules capable of targeting the at least one organism, wherein each treatment schedule comprises:
(A) at least one treatment in the field, and
(B) at least one time window for each treatment, and
(C) at least one agricultural method and/or product used for each treatment,
ranking the at least two treatment schedules, based on one or more of the following statistics (Q 1 ) to (Q 28 ), using a machine-implemented scheduling optimization model:
(Q 1 ) Minimized number of treatments required,
(Q 2 ) Minimized number of products applied,
(Q 3 ) Minimized number of crop protection products and/or of active ingredients applied,
(Q 4 ) Minimized total dose or total amount of products,
(Q 5 ) Minimized total dose or total amount of crop protection products,
(Q 6 ) Minimized number of agricultural equipment required,
(Q 7 ) Minimized total use time of agricultural equipment required,
(Q 8 ) Minimized number of application methods applied,
(Q 9 ) Minimized number of days in which treatments are conducted,
(Q 10 ) Minimized total time in which treatments are conducted,
(Q 11 ) Minimized treatment frequency index,
(Q 12 ) Minimized environmental load (e-load) index,
(Q 13 ) Minimized impact to beneficial organisms,
(Q 14 ) a number of priority organisms targeted with an efficacy above a defined threshold, wherein the defined threshold is above 80% and wherein the defined threshold represents a most weighted statistic per treatment schedule;
(Q 15 ) a number of priority organisms targeted with an efficacy above a defined first threshold, weighted or combined with a number of non-priority organisms targeted with an efficacy above a defined second threshold,
(Q 16 ) a number of all organisms targeted with an efficacy above the defined threshold;
(Q 17 ) maximum efficacy achieved or expected to be achieved across organisms by a given crop protection product;
(Q 18 ) a fraction of crop protection product in a treatment schedule of known preferred usage at a time of application;
(Q 19 ) an expected or achieved efficacy sum of all crop protection products in a treatment schedule for priority organisms;
(Q 20 ) an expected or achieved efficacy sum of all crop protection products in a treatment schedule for all organisms;
(Q 21 ) if applicable, an average expected control of residual efficacy duration in soil;
(Q 22 ) an index accounting for repeating a mode of action and/or active ingredient compared to previous applications,
(Q 23 ) a duration of the at least one time window for each treatment,
(Q 24 ) a postpone-ability of the at least one time window for each treatment,
(Q 25 ) a prepone-ability of the at least one time window for each treatment,
(Q 26 ) in case a corresponding treatment schedule comprises at least two treatments, a flexibility of leaving out one of the at least two treatments,
(Q 27 ) degree of independency of an efficacy of the treatment schedule from previous or subsequent treatments,
(Q 28 ) degree of independency of an efficacy of the treatment schedule from environmental and/or weather conditions,
outputting, by the computing device, a ranked list of the at least two treatment schedules; and generating, by the computing device, machine-readable control data and controlling the agricultural equipment to automatically perform at least one treatment actions associated with a treatment schedule selected from the ranked list, wherein the machine-readable control data is based on a highest ranked treatment schedule from the ranked list, or a treatment schedule selected by a user from the ranked list.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises the step of calculating statistics for each treatment schedule.

3 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the wherein the ranking is based on one or more of the statistics (Q 1 ) to (Q 13 ) and based on one or more of the statistics (Q 14 ) to (Q 22 ).

4 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the ranking is based on one or more of the statistics (Q 23 ) to (Q 28 ).

5 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the ranking is based on one or more of the statistics (Q 1 ) to (Q 13 ) and/or based on one or more of the statistics (Q 14 ) to (Q 22 ) and based on one or more of the statistics (Q 23 ) to (Q 28 ).

6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one treatment schedule comprises at least two treatments.

7 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one treatment schedule comprises at least two treatments wherein the at least one time window for the at least two treatments are not identical.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one treatment schedule comprises at least two treatments wherein the at least one agricultural method and/or product used for the at least two treatments are not identical.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one treatment schedule comprises at least two treatments wherein the at least one agricultural method and/or product used for the at least two treatments are not identical and wherein the at least one time window for the at least two treatments are not identical.

10 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the treatment schedule comprises:
(A) the at least one treatment in the field, and (B) the at least one time window for each treatment, and (C) at least one crop protection product used for each treatment, and, (D) at least one dosage or amount range of the at least one crop protection product used for each treatment.

Assignees

• Basf Agro Trademarks Gmbh

Inventors

• Hoffmann Holger
• Ilbasi Umit Baran
• Gerber Matthias

Classifications

• G06Q50/02

  Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining · CPC title

• G06Q10/0635

  Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities · CPC title

• G06Q10/0631 Primary

  Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations · CPC title

• G06Q30/0631

  Recommending goods or services · CPC title