Controlling transmission on a resource subject to a listen-before-talk procedure

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-12520180-B2
Application number	US-202118548947-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Mar 9, 2021
Priority date	Mar 9, 2021
Publication date	Jan 6, 2026
Grant date	Jan 6, 2026

Abstract

Wireless communication equipment ( 18 ) is configured for use in a wireless communication network ( 10 ). As listen-before-talk, LBT, attempts occur over time on a transmission resource ( 16 - 1 . . . 16 -N), the wireless communication equipment ( 18 ) makes updates to a performance rating ( 22 - 1 . . . 22 -N) for the transmission resource ( 16 - 1 . . . 16 -N) to reflect an observed likelihood of LBT attempt success or failure on the transmission resource ( 16 - 1 . . . 16 -N). Responsive to a failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource ( 16 - 1 . . . 16 -N) occurring unexpectedly according to the performance rating ( 22 - 1 . . . 22 -N), the wireless communication equipment ( 18 ) applies a bias ( 26 - n ) to the performance rating ( 22 - 1 . . . 22 -N) to reflect a greater likelihood of LBT attempt failure, or a smaller likelihood of LBT attempt success, than actually observed on the transmission resource ( 16 - 1 . . . 16 -N), and relaxes the applied bias ( 26 - n ) over time. The wireless communication equipment ( 18 ) controls transmission on the transmission resource ( 16 - 1 . . . 16 -N) based on this performance rating ( 22 - 1 . . . 22 -N) for the transmission resource ( 16 - 1 . . . 16 -N).

First claim

What is claimed is:

1 . A method performed by wireless communication equipment configured for use in a wireless communication network, the method comprising:
as listen-before-talk (LBT) attempts occur over time on a transmission resource, making updates to a performance rating for the transmission resource to reflect an observed likelihood of LBT attempt success or failure on the transmission resource; responsive to a failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurring unexpectedly according to the performance rating, applying a bias to the performance rating to reflect a greater likelihood of LBT attempt failure, or a smaller likelihood of LBT attempt success, than actually observed on the transmission resource, and relaxing the applied bias over time; and controlling transmission on the transmission resource based on the performance rating for the transmission resource.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a magnitude of the bias initially applied to the performance rating, before the applied bias is relaxed over time, is equal to a difference between:
an observed likelihood of LBT attempt success as of occurrence of the failed LBT attempt; and an observed likelihood of LBT attempt failure as of occurrence of the failed LBT attempt.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein relaxing the applied bias over time comprises reducing a magnitude of the applied bias at a rate proportional to a current magnitude of the applied bias such that a magnitude of the applied bias exponentially decays.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein relaxing the applied bias over time comprises periodically halving the bias to apply to the performance rating.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein applying the bias comprises applying the bias to the performance rating until the next LBT attempt occurs on the transmission resource.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the performance rating is specific to a certain wireless device and is selectively updated based on LBT attempts made on the transmission resource for a transmission to or from the certain wireless device; or the performance rating is common across multiple wireless devices and is updated based on LBT attempts made on the transmission resource for a transmission to or from any of the multiple wireless devices.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining whether a failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurs unexpectedly according to the performance rating by:
comparing the performance rating before the failed LBT attempt with the performance rating after the failed LBT attempt; and determining whether or not the failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurs unexpectedly, based on said comparing.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising either:
determining that the failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurs unexpectedly if the performance rating before the failed LBT attempt reflects a higher observed likelihood of LBT attempt success on the transmission resource than the performance rating after the failed LBT attempt; or determining that the failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurs unexpectedly if the performance rating before the failed LBT attempt reflects a lower observed likelihood of LBT attempt failure on the transmission resource than the performance rating after the failed LBT attempt.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising performing said updating, applying, relaxing, and controlling for each of multiple transmission resources, wherein said controlling is performed based on the respective performance ratings for the multiple transmission resources.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling transmission on the transmission resource comprises performing transmission resource selection, transmission resource aggregation, and/or transmission parameter adaptation.

11 . Wireless communication equipment configured for use in a wireless communication network, the wireless communication equipment comprising:
communication circuitry; and processing circuitry configured to:
as listen-before-talk (LBT) attempts occur over time on a transmission resource, make updates to a performance rating for the transmission resource to reflect an observed likelihood of LBT attempt success or failure on the transmission resource;
responsive to a failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurring unexpectedly according to the performance rating, apply a bias to the performance rating to reflect a greater likelihood of LBT attempt failure, or a smaller likelihood of LBT attempt success, than actually observed on the transmission resource, and relax the applied bias over time; and
control transmission on the transmission resource based on the performance rating for the transmission resource.

12 . The wireless communication equipment of claim 11 , wherein a magnitude of the bias initially applied to the performance rating, before the applied bias is relaxed over time, is equal to a difference between:
an observed likelihood of LBT attempt success as of occurrence of the failed LBT attempt; and an observed likelihood of LBT attempt failure as of occurrence of the failed LBT attempt.

13 . The wireless communication equipment of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to relax the applied bias over time by reducing a magnitude of the applied bias at a rate proportional to a current magnitude of the applied bias such that a magnitude of the applied bias exponentially decays.

14 . The wireless communication equipment of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to relax the applied bias over time by periodically halving the bias to apply to the performance rating.

15 . The wireless communication equipment of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to apply the bias by applying the bias to the performance rating until the next LBT attempt occurs on the transmission resource.

16 . The wireless communication equipment of claim 11 , wherein:
the performance rating is specific to a certain wireless device and is selectively updated based on LBT attempts made on the transmission resource for a transmission to or from the certain wireless device; or the performance rating is common across multiple wireless devices and is updated based on LBT attempts made on the transmission resource for a transmission to or from any of the multiple wireless devices.

17 . The wireless communication equipment of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to determine whether a failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurs unexpectedly according to the performance rating by:
comparing the performance rating before the failed LBT attempt with the performance rating after the failed LBT attempt; and determining whether or not the failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurs unexpectedly, based on said comparing.

18 . The wireless communication equipment of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to either:
determine that the failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurs unexpectedly if the performance rating before the failed LBT attempt reflects a higher observed likelihood of LBT attempt success on the transmission resource than the performance rating after the failed LBT attempt; or determine that the failed LBT attempt on the transmission resource occurs unexpectedly if the performance rating before the failed LBT attempt reflects a lower observed likelihood of LBT attempt failure on the transmis

Assignees

• Ericsson Telefon Ab L M

Inventors

• Palaios Alexandros
• Dudda Torsten
• Ansari Junaid
• Geuer Philipp
• Patel Dhruvin

Classifications

• H04W74/0808 Primary

  using carrier sensing, e.g. carrier sense multiple access [CSMA] · CPC title

• H04W24/02

  Arrangements for optimising operational condition · CPC title

• H04W72/02

  Selection of wireless resources by user or terminal · CPC title

• H04W16/14

  Spectrum sharing arrangements {between different networks} · CPC title

• H04W24/08 Primary

  Testing, {supervising or monitoring} using real traffic · CPC title