Route cleaning system

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-12509834-B2
Application number	US-202217698547-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Mar 18, 2022
Priority date	Jun 12, 2017
Publication date	Dec 30, 2025
Grant date	Dec 30, 2025

Abstract

A method for assessing contamination of a route includes imposing a first sliding value lower than a first threshold between one or more first wheels of a vehicle and the route, the one or more first wheels being the head the vehicle, imposing a second sliding value greater than a second threshold between one or more second wheels of the vehicle and the route, the one or more second wheels following the one or more first wheels and the second threshold being greater than the first threshold, and determining the trend of an adhesion curve between the one or more first wheels and the one or more second wheels and the route, based on a first adhesion value between the one or more first wheels and the route, and a second adhesion value between the one or more second wheels and the route.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1 . A method comprising:
imposing a first sliding value for first adhesion values between one or more first wheels of a vehicle and a route; imposing a second sliding value for second adhesion values between one or more second wheels of the vehicle and the route, the first sliding value smaller than a first predetermined threshold, the second sliding value greater than a second predetermined threshold; and determining a trend of an adhesion curve of one or more of the first adhesion values or the second adhesion values, comprising:
measuring the first adhesion values between the one or more first wheels and the route and the second adhesion values between the one or more second wheels and the route;
if the second adhesion value is greater than the first adhesion value, determining that the adhesion curve between the one or more wheels of the vehicle and the route is an adhesion curve having an adhesion peak at a sliding value greater than the second predetermined threshold; and
if the second adhesion value is lower than the first adhesion value, determining that the adhesion curve between the one or more wheels of the vehicle and the route is an adhesion curve having an adhesion peak at a sliding value lower than the first predetermined threshold,
wherein:
a) if it has been determined that the adhesion curve between the one or more second wheels of the vehicle and the route is an adhesion curve having an adhesion peak at a sliding value greater than the second predetermined threshold, the method comprises the step of:
imposing a sliding value greater than the second predetermined threshold between the one or more second wheels and the route;

b) if it has been determined that the adhesion curve between the one or more first wheels of the vehicle and the route is the adhesion curve having the adhesion peak at the sliding value lower than the first predetermined threshold, the method further comprises the steps of:
calculating a value of an adhesion difference by means of the difference between the first adhesion value and the second adhesion value;
imposing the second sliding value greater than the second predetermined threshold between a portion of one or more third wheels and the route, the one or more third wheels following the one or more second wheels in a direction of travel;
calculating a value of the adhesion difference generated by a cleaning effect of the one or more second wheels of the axle to the benefit of the one or more third wheels; the value of the adhesion difference generated by the cleaning effect being obtained by the difference between a third adhesion value between the one or more third wheels of the vehicle and the route, and the second adhesion value between the one or more second wheels of the second axle and the route;
imposing the sliding value greater than the second predetermined threshold between the one or more first wheels of the vehicle and the route, if the value of the adhesion difference generated by the cleaning effect of the one or more first wheels is predominant with respect to the value of the adhesion difference multiplied by an adaptive factor the value of which is inversely proportional to the number of wheels; and
imposing the sliding value lower than the first predetermined threshold between the one or more first wheels of the vehicle and the route, if the value of the adhesion difference generated by the cleaning effect of the one or more first wheels is not predominant with respect to the value of the adhesion difference multiplied by an adaptive factor the value of which is inversely proportional to the number of the wheels.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising assessing a contamination level of the route based on the trend of the adhesion curve.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising re-assessing the contamination level after the vehicle travels a predetermined distance.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising controlling movement of the one or more first wheels and/or the one or more second wheels based on the trend of the adhesion curve that is determined.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising cleaning a portion of the route based on the trend of the adhesion curve that is determined.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein cleaning the portion of the route comprises controlling movement of the one or more first wheels and/or the one or more second wheels for the one or more first wheels and/or the one or more second wheels to intentionally slip against the route.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein if it has been determined that the adhesion curve of the one or more first wheels of the vehicle is an adhesion curve having an adhesion peak at a sliding value lower than the first predetermined threshold, the method further comprises the step of:
after having imposed the second sliding value greater than the second predetermined threshold between the one or more second wheels and the route, due to nonpredominance of the value of the adhesion difference generated by the cleaning effect of the one or more second wheels with respect to the value of the adhesion difference multiplied by an adaptive factor the value of which is inversely proportional to the number of wheels, if the adhesion value of the one or more second wheels is coincident with the adhesion value of an adjacent wheel, imposing the first sliding value lower than the first predetermined threshold between the one or more first wheels and the route.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method for assessment of contamination of the route is repeated after a predetermined time interval.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first predetermined threshold is less than 5% and the second predetermined threshold is between 15% and 25%.

10 . A method comprising:
imposing a first sliding value lower than a first predetermined threshold between one or more first wheels of a vehicle and a route, the first sliding value being associated with one or more first wheels at a head of the vehicle according to a direction of travel of the vehicle; imposing a second sliding value greater than a second predetermined threshold between the one or more second wheels of the vehicle and the route; the second sliding value being associated with one or more second wheels following the one or more first wheels of the head of the vehicle according to the travel direction of the vehicle, and the second predetermined threshold being greater than the first predetermined threshold; imposing a third sliding value equal to the second sliding value between the one or more third wheels of the vehicle and the route; the third sliding value being associated with one or more third wheels following the one or more second wheels having the second sliding value according to the travel direction of the vehicle; determining effectiveness of the cleaning of the route generated by the second sliding value to the benefit of the one or more third wheels with the third sliding value and the route and a second adhesion value between the one or more third wheels having the third sliding value and the route.

11 . The system of claim 10 , further comprising assessing a contamination level of the route based on a trend between the first adhesion value and the second adhesion value.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising re-assessing the contamination level after the vehicle travels a predetermined distance.

13 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the step of determining the effectiveness of the cleaning of the route comprises the steps of:
measuring the first adhesion value and the second adhesion va

Assignees

• Faiveley Transport Italia Spa

Inventors

• Frea Matteo
• Imbert Luc

Classifications

• B60T2210/12

  Friction · CPC title

• B60L2200/26

  Rail vehicles · CPC title

• B60T8/172

  Determining control parameters used in the regulation, e.g. by calculations involving measured or detected parameters {(B60T8/17551 takes precedence)} · CPC title

• B60T17/228

  for railway vehicles · CPC title

• B60T8/1705

  for rail vehicles · CPC title