Method of and apparatus for determining variations in wall thickness in ferromagnetic tubes

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-12504267-B2
Application number	US-202118000554-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jul 2, 2021
Priority date	Jul 3, 2020
Publication date	Dec 23, 2025
Grant date	Dec 23, 2025

Abstract

A method can include energizing a tube with a longitudinally extending magnetic field generated inside the tube, using a magnetic field-detecting logging tool to generate magnetic flux signals generated inside the tube externally of the material of the tube wall resulting from such energizing at circumferential locations on the inner surface of the tube and at distances along the tube, iteratively using a model of the relationship between the generated magnetic flux signals and the thickness of the tube wall to derive a thickness profile of the tube wall by using (i) the magnetic permeability of the tube material deduced from the magnetic flux signals and (ii) a defect-free flux parameter representative of any non-linearity between the magnetic field strength and flux density in the tube, the iteration including using the model to calculate an initial approximate wall thickness profile using an initial estimate of the defect-free flux parameter.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1 . A method of determining variations in wall thickness in a tube defining a tube wall, wherein the tube is elongate, cylindrical, hollow and ferromagnetic, the method comprising steps of:
a) energizing the tube with an at least longitudinally extending magnetic field generated inside the tube that gives rise to near- or over-saturation of a material of the tube wall; b) using a magnetic field-detecting logging tool to (i) detect two or more magnetic flux leakage signals generated inside the tube other than in the material of the tube wall, resulting from such energizing, at plural circumferential locations on an inner surface and/or an outer surface of the tube and at a plurality of distances along the tube and (ii) generate two or more magnetic flux leakage data signals indicative thereof; c) iteratively, one or more times, using a model of a relationship between the two or more magnetic flux leakage data signals generated in the step b) and the thickness of the tube wall to derive a thickness profile of the tube wall by relating a defect-free flux leakage response representing a field strength defect-free offset in a magnetization plot of the tube averaged across two or more sensors of the magnetic field-detecting logging tool and a maximum flux leakage response in the presence of a defect measured by the magnetic field-detecting logging tool to give rise to a first approximation ratio, forming part of the model, that is proportional to defect penetration; d) inverting in accordance with the model to produce a defect profile which depends on the magnetic flux leakage signals without any external parameters; e) determining the defect penetration by determining a maximum of the defect profile; and f) generating one or more signals representing a wall thickness profile based on the defect penetration.

2 . The method according to claim 1 wherein the step a) of energizing the tube with an at least longitudinally extending magnetic field generated inside the tube includes operating, or permitting to operate, a source of an at least longitudinally extending magnetic field inside the tube supported in or by a magnetic field-generating logging tool.

3 . The method according to claim 1 wherein the step a) of energizing the tube with an at least longitudinally extending magnetic field generated inside the tube includes operating, or permitting to operate, a source of an at least longitudinally extending magnetic field inside the tube supported in or by a magnetic field-generating logging tool and wherein the magnetic field-generating logging tool is or is operatively connected to the magnetic field-detecting logging tool.

4 . The method according to claim 1 including a step of causing conveyance of at least the magnetic field-detecting logging tool from a position remote from the tube to two or more locations, inside the tube, that are spaced from one another along the tube; and carrying out the steps a) and b) in respect of the respective two or more locations.

5 . The method according to claim 1 including a step of causing conveyance of at least the magnetic field-detecting logging tool from a position remote from the tube to two or more locations, inside the tube, that are spaced from one another along the tube; and carrying out the steps a) and b) in respect of the respective two or more locations, the method further including supporting at least the magnetic field-detecting logging tool on wireline, that connects the magnetic field-detecting logging tool to one or more items of equipment that are remote from the tube, during such conveyance.

6 . The method according to claim 1 including a step of causing conveyance of at least the magnetic field-detecting logging tool from a position remote from the tube to two or more locations, inside the tube, that are spaced from one another along the tube; and carrying out the steps a) and b) in respect of the respective two or more locations, the method further including supporting at least the magnetic field-detecting logging tool on wireline, that connects the magnetic field-detecting logging tool to one or more items of equipment that are remote from the tube, during such conveyance; and further including supporting at least the magnetic field-detecting logging tool on wireline, that connects the magnetic field-detecting logging tool to processing apparatus that is remote from the tube, during carrying out of at least steps a) and b).

7 . The method according to claim 1 wherein the tube is or includes wellbore casing and/or liner.

8 . The method according to claim 1 including a step of causing conveyance of at least the magnetic field-detecting logging tool from a position remote from the tube to two or more locations, inside the tube, that are spaced from one another along the tube; and carrying out the steps a) and b) in respect of the respective two or more locations; wherein the tube is or includes wellbore casing and/or liner; and wherein the at least two locations inside the tube are non-coincident with any casing collars (if present) forming part of the tube.

9 . The method according to claim 1 wherein the tube is one of a plurality of serially interconnected tubes fixed in a subterranean location and defining a hollow column communicating with a surface location or communicating with a further hollow column that is connected to a surface location.

10 . The method according to claim 1 wherein the magnetic field-detecting logging tool includes a plurality of Hall-effect detectors of magnetic energy.

11 . The method according to claim 1 wherein the magnetic field-detecting logging tool includes a plurality of Hall-effect detectors of magnetic energy and wherein the plurality of Hall-effect detectors of magnetic flux are arrayed in a circular pattern defined circumferentially with respect to the magnetic field-detecting logging tool.

12 . The method according to claim 1 wherein the magnetic field-detecting logging tool includes a plurality of Hall-effect detectors of magnetic energy and further includes one or more arms supporting one or more pads mounting at least one pad-mounted Hall-effect sensor, the one or more arms being moveable from a retracted position in which the at least one pad-mounted Hall-effect sensor is spaced from the material of the tube; and a deployed position in which the pad contacts the material of the tube, the method including causing movement of the one or more arms between the retracted and deployed positions.

13 . The method according to claim 1 wherein when an applicable magnetisation law is non-linear, the model of the relationship between the two or more magnetic flux signals generated in the step b) and the tube wall thickness is of the form:
∇ 2 ·(μ( H 1 ) {right arrow over (H)} 1 | z=ζ ζ)=0  (1)

wherein μ(H 1 ) is magnetic permeability of the material of the ferromagnetic tube; {right arrow over (H)} 1 is the magnetic field within the material of the wall of the ferromagnetic tube; ζ represents the nominal thickness of the tube wall; z is the thickness direction of the tube wall; and ∇ 2 is the gradient operator with respect to the material of the wall of the ferromagnetic tube.

14 . The method according to claim 1 wherein when an applicable magnetisation law is non-linear, the model of the relationship between the two or more magnetic flux signals generated in the step b) and the tube wall thickness is of the form:
∇ 2 ·(μ( H 1 ) {right arrow over (H)} 1 | z=ζ ζ)=0  (1)

wherein μ(H 1 ) is magnetic permeability of the material of the ferromagnetic tube; {right arrow over (H)} 1 is the

Assignees

• Reeves Wireline Tech Ltd
• Weatherford Tech Holdings Llc

Inventors

• Assous Said
• Elkington Peter Adrian Spencer
• Bacciarelli Mark

Classifications

• G01V3/26

  operating with magnetic or electric fields produced or modified either by the surrounding earth formation or by the detecting device (with electromagnetic waves G01V3/30) · CPC title

• E21B47/08

  Measuring diameters or related dimensions at the borehole · CPC title

• E21B2200/20

  Computer models or simulations, e.g. for reservoirs under production, drill bits · CPC title

• G01B7/10 Primary

  using magnetic means, e.g. by measuring change of reluctance · CPC title

• G01N17/006

  of metals · CPC title