Training quantum evolutions using sublogical controls
US-2017351967-A1 · Dec 7, 2017 · US
US12475394B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12475394-B2 |
| Application number | US-202217742587-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 12, 2022 |
| Priority date | Jun 14, 2021 |
| Publication date | Nov 18, 2025 |
| Grant date | Nov 18, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods and systems for calibrating quantum processors are discussed. A model of a portion of the processor to be calibrated has one or more determinable parameters and an uncertainty for the determinable parameter(s). A measurement procedure is iteratively performed by selecting a subset of possible measurements and generating predicted measurement outcomes and predicted uncertainties for the determinable parameter for each measurement in the subset of possible measurements. Based on the predicted reduction in uncertainty for the determinable parameter, one or more measurements is selected. Instructions are transmitted to the quantum processor to perform the selected measurements, and the results are returned to update the model of the portion of the processor to be calibrated. Once a termination criteria is met, a calibrated value is generated for the determinable parameter. Compensating signals can be applied to devices of the quantum processor to calibrate the devices.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1 . A method of calibrating a quantum processor by a digital processor with improved efficiency, the quantum processor comprising one or more quantum devices, the method being performed by the digital processor in communication with the quantum processor, the method comprising: receiving a model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated, the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated including the one or more quantum devices, the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated having one or more determinable parameters, the model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated having as model parameters the one or more determinable parameters and a current uncertainty for each of the one or more determinable parameters; receiving one or more initial values for the model parameters of the model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated; initializing the model of the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated based on the one or more initial values; iterating a measurement procedure until a termination criteria is reached, the measurement procedure comprising: choosing a subset of possible measurements from a set of possible measurements for the quantum processor; generating a predicted measurement outcome and a predicted uncertainty for the one or more determinable parameters for each measurement in the subset of possible measurements; selecting one or more measurements from the subset of possible measurements based on a predicted reduction in uncertainty for the one or more determinable parameters; transmitting instructions to the quantum processor to perform the one or more measurements; receiving a result of the one or more measurements from the quantum processor; and updating the model of the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated based on the result of the one or more measurements; and generating one or more calibrated values for the one or more determinable parameters based on the updated model of the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving a model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated comprises receiving a model comprising one or more physical parameters of the one or more quantum devices and one or more measurement parameters of the one or more quantum devices, and the model predicts an outcome of a measurement on the quantum processor. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving one or more initial values for the model parameters of the model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated comprises receiving preliminary data for the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated, and wherein initializing the model of the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated based on the one or more initial values comprises initializing the model of the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated based on the preliminary data. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein receiving preliminary data for the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated comprises receiving noisy measurement results. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving a model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated comprises receiving a quantum-mechanical model of the one or more quantum devices. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein choosing a subset of possible measurements comprises one of: selecting a complete set of possible measurements, discretizing the set of possible measurements and selecting a discrete subset, selecting a random subset of the set of possible measurements, and selecting a subset based on known properties of the one or more quantum devices. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving a model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated, the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated including the one or more quantum devices comprises receiving a model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated, the portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated including one or more of a qubit, a coupler, a digital to analog converter (DAC), a control structure, and a readout device. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting one or more measurements from the subset of possible measurements based on a predicted reduction in uncertainty for the one or more determinable parameters comprises generating a measurement schedule based on a plurality of trained parameters of a machine learning model. 9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising applying a signal to a control device in communication with the one or more quantum devices to adjust operation of the one or more quantum devices in response to generating the calibrated value for the one or more determinable parameters. 10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving a model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated comprises receiving a model of a portion of the quantum processor to be calibrated that predicts an outcome of a measurement on the quantum processor. 11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein selecting one or more measurements from the subset of possible measurements based on a predicted reduction in uncertainty for the one or more determinable parameters comprises selecting one or more measurements from the subset of possible measurements based on a projected reduction in a distance between a prediction of the model of an outcome of a measurement on the quantum processor and an actual outcome of the measurements. 12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein iterating a measurement procedure until a termination criteria is reached comprises iterating a measurement procedure for one of: a number of iterations, a processing time, a number of measurements, a threshold accuracy for the one or more determinable parameters, a number of digital processor cycles, and a number of quantum processor cycles. 13 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising comparing the current uncertainty for the one or more determinable parameters to a threshold accuracy for the one or more determinable parameters, and wherein iterating a measurement procedure until a termination criteria is reached comprises iterating a measurement procedure until the current uncertainty for the one or more determinable parameters is less than or equal to the termination criteria. 14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting one or more measurements from the subset of possible measurements comprises selecting a set of multiple measurements from the subset of possible measurements, the set of multiple measurements comprising measurements that are measurable in parallel, and wherein transmitting instructions to the quantum processor to perform the one or more measurements comprises transmitting instructions to the quantum processor to perform the set of multiple measurements in parallel. 15 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating the initial values by instructing the quantum processor to perform one or more initial measurements, and wherein receiving one or more initial values comprises receiving the one or more initial values from the quantum processor. 16 . A hybrid computing system, the hybrid computing system comprising: a quantum processor comprising one or more quantum devices; a digital processor communicatively coupled with the quantum processor; at least one non-transitory processor-readable medium that stores at least one of processor-executable instructions and data; and the digital processor communicatively coupled to the least one non-transitory processor-readable medium, which, in response to execution of th
Physical realisations or architectures of quantum processors or components for manipulating qubits, e.g. qubit coupling or qubit control · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
Models of quantum computing, e.g. quantum circuits or universal quantum computers · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.