Semantic Interpreter for Natural Language Commanding in Applications Via Program Synthesis
US-2024378399-A1 · Nov 14, 2024 · US
US12450243B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12450243-B1 |
| Application number | US-202519204415-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | May 9, 2025 |
| Priority date | Dec 18, 2023 |
| Publication date | Oct 21, 2025 |
| Grant date | Oct 21, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and methods for streamlining risk modeling in software development using natively sourced kernels are described. The system may receive a native kernel for the first model, wherein the native kernel comprises a native code sample and a native description of the native code sample. The system may input the native code sample into an artificial intelligence model to generate a first output. The system may filter the first output based on the native description to generate a first validation assessment for the first model. The system may generate for display, in the user interface, the first validation assessment.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system for searching and storing data over a secured computer network, the system comprising: one or more hardware processors; and one or more computer-readable media comprising instructions recorded thereon that when executed by the one or more hardware processors cause operations comprising: generating an encrypted datastore by: receiving a plurality of secure applications; parsing the plurality of secure applications determine a plurality of labeled code samples; parsing the plurality of labeled code samples to determine labeled code sample characteristics corresponding to one or more of the plurality of labeled code samples; and encrypting the plurality of labeled code samples to generate a plurality of encrypted labeled code samples; receiving, via a user interface, a first user input comprising a first search request for code samples in the encrypted datastore that have a first characteristic; generating a first encrypted feature input based on the first search request; inputting the first encrypted feature input into a first trained model to receive a first encrypted output, wherein the first trained model compares code sample characteristics described by inputted first features inputs to the labeled code sample characteristics corresponding to one or more of the plurality of encrypted labeled code samples to generate outputs identifying one or more of the plurality of encrypted labeled code samples; generating a second encrypted feature input based on the first encrypted output; inputting the first encrypted output into a second trained model to receive a second encrypted output, wherein the second trained model generates human-readable descriptions related to the labeled code sample characteristics of the one or more of the plurality of labeled code samples identified by feature based on inputted second feature inputs; and generating for display, in the user interface, a first recommendation of results corresponding to the first search request based on the second encrypted output, wherein the first recommendation is unencrypted. 2. A method for searching and storing data over a computer network, the method comprising: accessing a datastore populated by: receiving a plurality of applications; parsing the plurality of applications determine a plurality of labeled code samples; and parsing the plurality of labeled code samples to determine labeled code sample characteristics corresponding to one or more of the plurality of labeled code samples; receiving, via a user interface, a first user input comprising a first search request for code samples in the datastore having that have a first characteristic; generating a first feature input based on the first search request; inputting the first feature input into a first trained model to receive a first output, wherein the first output comprises a labeled code sample comprising a first labeled characteristic that corresponds to the first characteristic, and wherein the first trained model compares code sample characteristics described by inputted first features inputs to the labeled code sample characteristics corresponding to one or more of h plurality of labeled code samples to generate outputs identifying one or more of the plurality of labeled code samples; generating a second feature input based on the first output; inputting the first output into a second trained model to receive a second output, wherein the second output comprises a human-readable description of the labeled code sample, and wherein the second trained model generates descriptions related to the labeled code sample characteristics of the one or more of the plurality of labeled code samples identified by feature based on inputted second feature inputs; and generating for display, in the user interface, a first recommendation of results corresponding to the first search request based on the second output. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the receiving of the first user input further comprises: receiving native code sample for an application under development; determining that the native code sample comprises the first characteristic; and populating the first search request with the first characteristic based on determining that the native code sample comprises the first characteristic. 4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the receiving of the first user input further comprises: receiving native code for an application under development; determining a first code sample boundary in the native code; parsing a portion of the native code based on the first code sample boundary; and determining the first characteristic based on the portion. 5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the receiving of the first user input further comprises: receiving native code for an application under development; determining a first containerized portion in the native code; and parsing the first containerized portion to determine the first characteristic. 6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the receiving of the first user input further comprises: receiving a native code sample for an application under development; determining a code dependency in the native code sample; and determining the first characteristic based on the code dependency. 7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the receiving of the first user input further comprises: receiving native code for an application under development; performing a runtime analysis of the native code in a sandbox environment; and determining the first characteristic based on the runtime analysis. 8. The method of claim 2 , wherein the receiving of the first user input further comprises: receiving a native code sample for an application under development; tokenizing the native code sample to generate a token representation; determining a syntax tree based on the token representation; and determining the first characteristic based on the syntax tree. 9. The method of claim 2 , wherein the receiving of the first user input further comprises: receiving a native code sample for an application under development; determining a naming convention in the native code sample; and determining the first characteristic based on the naming convention. 10. The method of claim 2 , wherein the inputting of the first feature input into the first trained model to receive the first output further comprises: determining a first code function corresponding to the first characteristic; and comparing the first code function to a labeled code function corresponding to the first labeled characteristic. 11. The method of claim 2 , wherein the inputting of the first feature input into the first trained model to receive the first output further comprises: determining a data value corresponding to the first characteristic; and comparing the data value to a plurality of data values in the labeled code sample. 12. The method of claim 2 , wherein the inputting of the first feature input into the first trained model to receive the first output further comprises: determining a similarity between the first characteristic and the first labeled characteristic; and comparing the similarity to a threshold similarity. 13. The method of claim 2 , wherein the inputting of the first feature input into the first trained model to receive the first output further comprises: determining a first data source for a native code sample corresponding to the first characteristic; and comparing the first data source to a labeled data source corresponding to the first labeled characteristic. 14. The method of claim 2 , wherein the inputting of the first
Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
Special types of queries, e.g. statistical queries, fuzzy queries or distributed queries · CPC title
Query predicate definition using graphical user interfaces, including menus and forms (G06F16/2423 takes precedence) · CPC title
Structural analysis for program understanding · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.