Enhancing synergy between machine learning models and annotators
US-2023177115-A1 · Jun 8, 2023 · US
US12443155B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12443155-B2 |
| Application number | US-202318142536-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 2, 2023 |
| Priority date | May 2, 2023 |
| Publication date | Oct 14, 2025 |
| Grant date | Oct 14, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An apparatus and method for actualizing future process outputs using artificial intelligence are provided. The apparatus includes at least a processor and a memory communicatively coupled to the at least a processor. The memory contains instructions configuring the at least a processor to receive input data associated with a user, identify at least one future process output as a function of the input data and classify the input data into one or more objective groups as a function of an objective group classifier and the at least one future process output. The processor is further configured to determine at least an actualization item as a function of the one or more objective groups and the future process output, determine at least a process parameter as a function of the future process output, and generate an objective report as a function of the success rate.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. An apparatus for actualizing future process outputs using artificial intelligence, the apparatus comprising: at least a processor; and a memory communicatively coupled to the at least a processor, the memory containing instructions configuring the at least a processor to: receive input data comprising cluster data, wherein the cluster data comprises data associated with each user of a clustered group of users, wherein the clustered group comprises an organized body, wherein the cluster data comprises user role data comprising data associated with a current role of each user within the organized body; identify at least one future process output as a function of the input data, wherein identifying the at least one future process output as a function of the input data comprises: receiving user training data; training a future process output machine learning model as a function of the user training data; and generating a plurality of future process outputs using the trained future process output machine learning model; determine a highest priority future process output of the plurality of future process outputs using a linear program configured to optimize a linear objective function performed by the at least a processor, given at least a user constraint; classify the highest priority future process output into one or more objective groups as a function of an objective group classifier; determine at least an actualization item as a function of the one or more objective groups and the highest priority future process output; determine at least a process parameter as a function of the highest priority future process output; and generate an objective output as a function of the at least a process parameter. 2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein determining the highest priority future process output further comprises ranking the plurality of future process outputs. 3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein determining the at least an actualization item as a function of the one or more objective groups and highest priority future process output comprises: generating an actualization item machine learning model; training the actualization item machine learning model as a function of actualization item training data; and generating the at least an actualization item using the trained actualization item machine learning model. 4. The apparatus of claim 3 , wherein determining the at least an actualization item as a function of the one or more objective groups and highest priority future process output comprises: determining an actualization item score for each of the at least an actualization item; comparing each actualization item score to a threshold actualization item score; and identifying the at least an actualization item based on the comparison of each actualization item score to the threshold actualization item score. 5. The apparatus of claim 4 , wherein determining the at least an actualization item as a function of the one or more objective groups and the highest priority future process output comprises generating a ranked list of the at least an actualization item as a function of the actualization item score. 6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein determining the at least a process parameter as a function of the highest priority future process output comprises: generating a process parameter machine learning model; training the process parameter machine learning model as a function of process parameter training data; and generating the at least a process parameter using the trained process parameter machine learning model. 7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the memory further comprises instructions configuring the at least a processor to determine a success expectation for the at least one user objective as a function of the user data, wherein determining the success expectation for the at least one user objective as a function of the user data comprises: generating a success machine learning model; training the success machine learning model as a function of success training data; and generating the success expectation using the trained success machine learning model. 8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the memory further comprises instructions configuring the at least a processor to receive a user response from at least one user for the at least an actualization item, wherein the user response from the at least one user comprises a modification to the at least a process parameter. 9. A method for actualizing future process outputs using artificial intelligence, the method comprising: receiving, by at least a processor, input data comprising cluster data, wherein the cluster data comprises data associated with each user of a clustered group of users, wherein the clustered group comprises an organized body, wherein the cluster data comprises user role data comprising data associated with a current role of each user within the organized body; identifying, by the at least a processor, at least one future process output as a function of the input data, wherein identifying the at least one future process output as a function of the input data comprises: receiving user training data; training a future process output machine learning model as a function of the user training data; and generating a plurality of future process outputs using the trained future process output machine learning model; determining, by the at least a processor, a highest priority future process output of the plurality of future process outputs using a linear program configured to optimize a linear objective function performed by the at least a processor, given at least a user constraint; classifying, by the at least a processor, the highest priority future process output into one or more objective groups as a function of an objective group classifier; determining, by the at least a processor, at least an actualization item as a function of the one or more objective groups and the highest priority future process output; determining, by the at least a processor, at least a process parameter as a function of the highest priority future process output; and generating, by the at least a processor, an objective output as a function of the at least a process parameter. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining the highest priority future process output further comprises ranking the plurality of future process outputs. 11. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining the at least an actualization item as a function of the one or more objective groups and the highest priority future process output comprises: generating, by the at least a processor, an actualization item machine learning model; training, by the at least a processor, the actualization item machine learning model as a function of actualization item training data; and generating, by the at least a processor, the at least a actualization item using the trained actualization item machine learning model. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the at least an actualization item as a function of the one or more objective groups and the highest priority future process output comprises: determining, by the at least a processor, an actualization item score for each of the at least an actualization item; comparing, by the at least a processor, each actualization item score to a threshold actualization item score; and identifying, by the at least a processor, the at least an actualization item based on the comparison of each actualization item score to the threshold actualization item score. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein determining the at le
Machine learning · CPC title
Supervised learning · CPC title
Learning methods · CPC title
in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.