Method for applying msd and apparatus thereof
US-2022369405-A1 · Nov 17, 2022 · US
US12425110B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12425110-B2 |
| Application number | US-202017756692-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 6, 2020 |
| Priority date | Jan 6, 2020 |
| Publication date | Sep 23, 2025 |
| Grant date | Sep 23, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a testing equipment may transmit a set of test signals to a device under test (DUT) from a plurality of directions relative to the DUT; obtain, from the DUT, a set of measured multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) sensitivity results based at least in part on the set of test signals; and determine a MIMO over the air (OTA) performance of the DUT based at least in part on a single measured MIMO sensitivity result of the set of measured MIMO sensitivity results or an average of MIMO sensitivity results, in a subset of the set of measured MIMO sensitivity results, that satisfy a threshold percentile. Numerous other aspects are provided.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method performed by a testing equipment, comprising: transmitting a set of test signals to a device under test (DUT) from a plurality of directions relative to the DUT; obtaining, from the DUT, a set of measured multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) sensitivity results based at least in part on the set of test signals; and determining a MIMO over the air (OTA) performance of the DUT based at least in part on an average of a linear scale of a subset of the set of measured MIMO sensitivity results, the subset selected based at least in part on a threshold percentile. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the MIMO OTA performance of the DUT comprises: determining whether the DUT satisfies a MIMO OTA performance parameter based at least in part on whether the average of the MIMO sensitivity results satisfies a threshold MIMO sensitivity for the MIMO OTA performance parameter. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: selecting the threshold percentile based at least in part on a power class of the DUT. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: selecting the plurality of directions relative to the DUT based at least in part on satisfaction of a spherical coverage parameter. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein selecting the plurality of directions relative to the DUT comprises: transmitting an additional set of test signals from a set of directions relative to the DUT; obtaining, from the DUT, a set of measurements of receiver sensitivity of the DUT for the set of directions based at least in part on the additional set of test signals; and selecting the plurality of directions relative to the DUT based at least in part on a determination that corresponding measurements of receiver sensitivity of the DUT satisfy the spherical coverage parameter. 6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: selecting the plurality of directions relative to the DUT based at least in part on a transmitting power map of the DUT. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein selecting the plurality of directions relative to the DUT: transmitting, to the DUT, a first set of signals to initiate transmitting power map training for the DUT; receiving, from the DUT, a second set of signals; determining, based at least in part on the second set of signals, the transmitting power map of the DUT; and selecting, based at least in part on the transmitting power map of the DUT, the plurality of directions relative to the DUT for testing MIMO OTA performance of the DUT. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subset of the measured MIMO sensitivity results comprises K sensitivity results, and wherein the method further comprises: computing the average according to: S X = 1 0 log [ K ∑ i = 1 K 1 10 P i 10 ] , wherein P i is a measured MIMO sensitivity result in the subset. 9. A testing equipment for wireless communication, comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories, the one or more processors configured to: transmit a set of test signals to a device under test (DUT) from a plurality of directions relative to the DUT; obtain, from the DUT, a set of measured multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) sensitivity results based at least in part on the set of test signals; and determine a MIMO over the air (OTA) performance of the DUT based at least in part on an average of a linear scale of a subset of the set of measured MIMO sensitivity results, the subset selected based at least in part on a threshold percentile. 10. The testing equipment of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors, to determine the MIMO OTA performance of the DUT, are configured to: determine whether the DUT satisfies a MIMO OTA performance parameter based at least in part on whether the average of the MIMO sensitivity results satisfies a threshold MIMO sensitivity for the MIMO OTA performance parameter. 11. The testing equipment of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to: select the threshold percentile based at least in part on a power class of the DUT. 12. The testing equipment of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to: select the plurality of directions relative to the DUT based at least in part on satisfaction of a spherical coverage parameter. 13. The testing equipment of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors, to select the plurality of directions relative to the DUT, are configured to: transmit an additional set of test signals from a set of directions relative to the DUT; obtain, from the DUT, a set of measurements of receiver sensitivity of the DUT for the set of directions based at least in part on the additional set of test signals; and select the plurality of directions relative to the DUT based at least in part on a determination that corresponding measurements of receiver sensitivity of the DUT satisfy the spherical coverage parameter. 14. The testing equipment of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to: select the plurality of directions relative to the DUT based at least in part on a transmitting power map of the DUT. 15. The testing equipment of claim 14 , wherein the one or more processors, to select the plurality of directions relative to the DUT, are configured to: transmit, to the DUT, a first set of signals to initiate transmitting power map training for the DUT; receive, from the DUT, a second set of signals; determine, based at least in part on the second set of signals, the transmitting power map of the DUT; and select, based at least in part on the transmitting power map of the DUT, the plurality of directions relative to the DUT for testing MIMO OTA performance of the DUT. 16. The testing equipment of claim 14 , wherein the subset of the measured MIMO sensitivity results comprises K sensitivity results, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to: compute the average according to: S X = 1 0
taking into account the quality of service QoS · CPC title
Power distribution · CPC title
using historical data, averaging values or statistics · CPC title
Receiver sensitivity · CPC title
using test signal generators · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.