Data center networks using bottleneck structures
US-12218802-B1 · Feb 4, 2025 · US
US12413481B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12413481-B2 |
| Application number | US-202418653829-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 2, 2024 |
| Priority date | Feb 17, 2021 |
| Publication date | Sep 9, 2025 |
| Grant date | Sep 9, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A network is designed based on its topology and the expected flow patterns in the network. The use of the latter can lead to efficient use of network resources and can reduce or even minimize waste. Non-interference properties of the expected flows can yield an improved or even optimal design.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A processor-implemented method for selecting a network parameter, the method comprising: obtaining an expected traffic pattern for a network, the network comprising a plurality of levels of switches and corresponding links; selecting a network parameter corresponding to a switch or link at a selected level based on, in part, a portion of the expected network traffic pattern associated with that switch or link; and calculating a wasteless network design, based on the network parameter, that minimizes flow completion times and maximizes network throughput, the wasteless network design configured to route the expected traffic pattern with all bandwidth of each link used throughout transmission of the expected traffic pattern. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining from the expected traffic pattern skewedness of the traffic, wherein selecting the network parameter is based on, in part, the skewedness. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein selecting the network parameter is based on, in part, a tapering parameter that is based on, in part, the skewedness. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the network comprises a fat-tree network; the network parameter comprises capacity of links at a particular level of switches; and selecting the capacity of links at one level of switches is further based on, in part, capacity of links at another level of switches. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the network comprises a folded-clos network; the network parameter comprises a number of spine blocks of the folded clos network; and selecting the number of spine blocks is further based on, in part, a radix of spine-level switches. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the network comprises a Dragonfly network; the network parameter comprises a capacity of interpod links and a capacity of intrapod links; and selecting the capacity of interpod links is further based on, in part, the capacity of intrapod links. 7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising: iteratively partitioning pods in the Dragonfly network into a plurality of groups, wherein selecting the capacity of interpod links is further based on, in part, a total number of groups and a total number of pods in a last group. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein a capacity of a link at one of the plurality of levels is selected to be proportional to an expected size of flows traversing that link. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein a capacity of a link at one of the plurality of levels is selected based on a specified time of completion of all expected network flows. 10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: obtaining an updated traffic pattern; and updating the network parameter based on, at least in part, the updated traffic pattern. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the network comprises a sliced network having a plurality of virtual network slices; and selecting the network parameter comprises selecting a corresponding network parameter of at least one network slice. 12. A system for selecting a network parameter, the system comprising: a first processor; and a first memory in electrical communication with the first processor, and comprising instructions that, when executed by a processing unit that comprises one or more computing units, wherein one of the one or more computing units comprises the first processor or a second processor, and wherein the processing unit is in electronic communication with a memory module that comprises the first memory or a second memory, program the processing unit to: obtain an expected traffic pattern for a network, the network comprising a plurality of levels of switches and corresponding links; select a network parameter corresponding to a switch or link at a selected level based on, in part, a portion of the expected network traffic pattern associated with that switch or link; and calculate a wasteless network design, based on the network parameter, that minimizes flow completion times and maximizes network throughput, the wasteless network design configured to route the expected traffic pattern with all bandwidth of each link used throughout transmission of the expected traffic pattern. 13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the instructions further program the processing unit to: determine from the expected traffic pattern skewedness of the traffic; and select the network parameter is based on, in part, the skewedness. 14. The system of claim 12 , wherein: the network comprises a fat-tree network; the network parameter comprises capacity of links at a particular level of switches; and the instructions program the processing unit to select the capacity of links at one level of switches based on, in part, capacity of links at another level of switches. 15. The system of claim 12 , wherein: the network comprises a folded-clos network; the network parameter comprises a number of spine blocks of the folded clos network; and the instructions program the processing unit to select the number of spine blocks based on, in part, a radix of spine-level switches. 16. The system of claim 12 , wherein: the network comprises a Dragonfly network; the network parameter comprises a capacity of interpod links and a capacity of intrapod links; and the instructions program the processing unit to select the capacity of interpod links based on, in part, the capacity of intrapod links. 17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the instructions program the processing unit to select a capacity of a link at one of the plurality of levels: to be proportional to an expected size of flows traversing that link, and/or to select the capacity based on a specified time of completion of all expected network flows. 18. The system of claim 12 , wherein the instructions program the processing unit to: obtain an updated traffic pattern; and update the network parameter based on, at least in part, the updated traffic pattern. 19. The system of claim 12 , wherein: the network comprises a sliced network having a plurality of virtual network slices; and to select the network parameter, the instructions program the processing unit to select a corresponding network parameter of at least one network slice. 20. A network comprising: at least one processor; memory coupled to the at least one processor; a plurality of levels of hardware switches and corresponding links, the hardware switches coupled to the at least one processor and the memory, wherein a network parameter corresponding to a switch or link at a selected level is proportional to an aggregate expected network traffic pattern associated with that switch or link, the network parameter implementing a wasteless network design for routing the expected network traffic pattern while minimizing flow completion times and maximizing network throughput with all bandwidth of each link used throughout transmission of an expected traffic pattern. 21. The network of claim 20 , wherein the network parameter is based on, in part, a skewedness of the traffic. 22. The network of claim 21 , wherein the network parameter is based on, in part, a tapering parameter that is based on, in part, the skewedness. 23. The network of claim 20 , wherein: a topology of the network is fat-tree; the network parameter comprises capacity of links at a particular level of hardware switches; and the capacity of links at one level of hardware switches is based on, in part, capacity of links
Non-blocking multistage, e.g. Clos · CPC title
by using congestion prediction · CPC title
Routing tree calculation · CPC title
involving simulating, designing, planning or modelling of a network · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.