Inferred energy usage and multiple levels of energy usage
US-2016147205-A1 · May 26, 2016 · US
US12393992B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12393992-B2 |
| Application number | US-202217826635-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 27, 2022 |
| Priority date | Oct 18, 2018 |
| Publication date | Aug 19, 2025 |
| Grant date | Aug 19, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and methods for controlling building equipment include simulating operation of the building equipment at a plurality of initial points to generate corresponding values of a first control objective and a second control objective that competes with the first control objective, automatically generating a new point at which to run a new simulation based on the plurality of initial points and the corresponding values of the control objectives, running the new simulation at the new point to generate corresponding values of the control objectives, classifying a subset of the plurality of initial points and the new point as Pareto-optimal points based on the corresponding values of the control objectives, and operating the building equipment at a Pareto-optimal point selected from the subset of the plurality of initial points and the new point classified as Pareto-optimal points.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system for controlling building equipment comprising: one or more processors and one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: simulating operation of the building equipment at a plurality of initial points to generate corresponding values of a first control objective and a second control objective that competes with the first control objective, wherein simulating the operation of the building equipment comprises executing a control algorithm subject to one or more constraints, each of the plurality of initial points defining a different simulation configuration comprising different values for the one or more constraints; automatically generating a new point at which to run a new simulation based on the plurality of initial points and the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective; running the new simulation at the new point to generate corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective; classifying a subset of the plurality of initial points and the new point as Pareto-optimal points based on the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective; and operating the building equipment at a Pareto-optimal point selected from the subset of the plurality of initial points and the new point classified as Pareto-optimal points. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein simulating the operation of the building equipment at the plurality of initial points comprises running an initial simulation for each of the plurality of initial points, each initial simulation generating a corresponding value of the first control objective and a corresponding value of the second control objective. 3. The system of claim 1 , wherein automatically generating the new point at which to run the new simulation comprises executing a process configured to suggest one or more Pareto-optimal points based on the plurality of initial points and the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein automatically generating the new point at which to run the new simulation comprises: constructing an approximation function based on the plurality of initial points and the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective for the plurality of initial points; and finding a point that optimizes the approximation function. 5. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising: generating an updated dataset comprising the plurality of initial points, the new point, and the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective for the plurality of initial points and the new point; and automatically generating a second new point at which to run a second new simulation based on the updated dataset. 6. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising: providing a user interface that indicates the subset of the plurality of initial points and the new point classified as Pareto-optimal points; and receiving a user selection of the Pareto-optimal point at which to operate the building equipment via the user interface. 7. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising providing a user interface comprising values of a set of performance metrics comprising at least the first control objective and the second control objective, each set of performance metrics predicted to result from operating the building equipment at one of the plurality of initial points. 8. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising: adjusting weights assigned to a plurality of performance metrics characterizing the operation of the building equipment at the plurality of initial points; and assigning a score to each of the plurality of initial points, each score based on (i) values of the plurality of performance metrics predicted to result from operating the building equipment at the plurality of initial points and (ii) the weights assigned to the plurality of performance metrics. 9. The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising: assigning a score to each of the plurality of initial points based on values of a plurality of performance metrics predicted to result from operating the building equipment at the plurality of initial points; and providing a user interface that arranges the plurality of initial points according to the score assigned to each of the plurality of initial points. 10. A method for controlling building equipment comprising: simulating operation of the building equipment at a plurality of initial points to generate corresponding values of a first control objective and a second control objective that competes with the first control objective, wherein simulating the operation of the building equipment comprises executing a control algorithm subject to one or more constraints, each of the plurality of initial points defining different values for the one or more constraints; automatically generating a new point at which to run a new simulation based on the plurality of initial points and the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective; running the new simulation at the new point to generate corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective; classifying a subset of the plurality of initial points and the new point as Pareto-optimal points based on the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective; and operating the building equipment at a Pareto-optimal point selected from the subset of the plurality of initial points and the new point classified as Pareto-optimal points. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein simulating the operation of the building equipment at the plurality of initial points comprises running an initial simulation for each of the plurality of initial points, each initial simulation generating a corresponding value of the first control objective and a corresponding value of the second control objective. 12. The method of claim 10 , wherein automatically generating the new point at which to run the new simulation comprises executing a process configured to suggest one or more Pareto-optimal points based on the plurality of initial points and the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective. 13. The method of claim 10 , wherein automatically generating the new point at which to run the new simulation comprises: constructing an approximation function based on the plurality of initial points and the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective for the plurality of initial points; and finding a point that optimizes the approximation function. 14. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: generating an updated dataset comprising the plurality of initial points, the new point, and the corresponding values of the first control objective and the second control objective for the plurality of initial points and the new point; and automatically generating a second new point at which to run a second new simulation based on the updated dataset. 15. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: providing a user interface that indicates the subset of the plurality of initial points and the new point classified as Pareto-optimal points; and receiving a user selection of the Pareto-optimal point at which to o
Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads · CPC title
Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals · CPC title
Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis · CPC title
Probabilistic or stochastic CAD · CPC title
involving the use of models or simulators · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.