Grease deterioration detecting method and lubricant deterioration detecting method
US-2024310354-A1 · Sep 19, 2024 · US
US12379322B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12379322-B2 |
| Application number | US-202018247570-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 24, 2020 |
| Priority date | Oct 2, 2020 |
| Publication date | Aug 5, 2025 |
| Grant date | Aug 5, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A sparkle contrast correcting method includes a step of acquiring a first sparkle contrast that is caused by an anti-glare layer that is disposed on a surface of an electronic display and information that represents a first measurement condition, the first sparkle contrast being used as a comparison standard and being measured in the first measurement condition by using a first imaging lens that images emitted light from the anti-glare layer and a first two-dimensional image sensor on which the emitted light is imaged, a step of acquiring a second sparkle contrast that is caused by the anti-glare layer and information that represents a second measurement condition, the second sparkle contrast being used as a comparison target and being measured in the second measurement condition that differs from the first measurement condition by using a second imaging lens that images emitted light from the anti-glare layer and a second two-dimensional image sensor on which the emitted light is imaged, and a step of correcting the second sparkle contrast, based on a ratio between the first measurement condition and the second measurement condition for comparison with the first sparkle contrast.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A sparkle contrast correcting method comprising: a step of acquiring a first sparkle contrast that is caused by an anti-glare layer that is disposed on a surface of an electronic display and information that represents a first measurement condition, the first sparkle contrast being used as a comparison standard and being measured in the first measurement condition by using a first imaging lens that images emitted light from the anti-glare layer and a first two-dimensional image sensor on which the emitted light is imaged; a step of acquiring a second sparkle contrast that is caused by the anti-glare layer and information that represents a second measurement condition, the second sparkle contrast being used as a comparison target and being measured in the second measurement condition that differs from the first measurement condition by using a second imaging lens that images emitted light from the anti-glare layer and a second two-dimensional image sensor on which the emitted light is imaged; and a step of correcting the second sparkle contrast, based on a ratio between the first measurement condition and the second measurement condition for comparison with the first sparkle contrast. 2. The sparkle contrast correcting method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of correcting the second sparkle contrast is performed in accordance with a numerical formula (1) expressed as: S P 2 a=S P 2×( F 2/ F 1)×( d 2/ d 1)×( f 1/ f 2)×( M 2/ M 1) 0.5 , (1) where S P 2a is the second sparkle contrast that is corrected, S P 2 is the second sparkle contrast that is not corrected, F1 is an image effective F-number of the first imaging lens, included in the first measurement condition, F2 is an image effective F-number of the second imaging lens, included in the second measurement condition, d1 is a distance from the anti-glare layer to the first imaging lens, included in the first measurement condition, d2 is a distance from the anti-glare layer to the second imaging lens, included in the second measurement condition, f1 is an effective focal length of the first imaging lens, included in the first measurement condition, f2 is an effective focal length of the second imaging lens, included in the second measurement condition, M1 is a value that is calculated by using a numerical formula (2), and M2 is a value that is calculated by using a numerical formula (3), the numerical formula (2) being expressed as: [ Math . 1 ] M 1 = [ Ac 1 Am 1 erf ( π Am 1 Ac 1 ) - ( Ac 1 π Am 1 ) { 1 - exp ( - π Am 1 Ac 1 ) } ] - 2 ( 2 ) where Ac1 is a parameter expressed as (((4/π)×F1×λ)/2) 2 ×π, where λ is a wavelength of the emitted light, Am1 is a parameter expressed as p1 2 , where p1 is a pixel pitch of the first two-dimensional image sensor, included in the first measurement condition, and erf is a standard error function, the numerical formula (3) being expressed as: [ Math . 2 ] M
Liquid crystal panels · CPC title
Coatings · CPC title
the surface having an irregular structure (G02B5/0226 takes precedence) · CPC title
Investigating thin films, e.g. matrix isolation method · CPC title
Testing optical properties · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.