Systems and methods for vergence matching with an optical profile and using refractive index writing
US-2020315783-A1 · Oct 8, 2020 · US
US12336759B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12336759-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117330327-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 25, 2021 |
| Priority date | May 29, 2020 |
| Publication date | Jun 24, 2025 |
| Grant date | Jun 24, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system and method for selecting an intraocular lens, for implantation into an eye, includes a controller having a processor and a tangible, non-transitory memory on which instructions are recorded. The controller is configured to selectively execute a machine learning model trained with a training dataset. Execution of the instructions by the processor causes the controller to obtain pre-operative objective data for the patient, including one or more anatomic eye measurements. The controller is configured to obtain pre-operative questionnaire data for the patient, including at least one personality trait. The pre-operative objective data and the pre-operative questionnaire data are entered as respective inputs to the machine learning model. A predicted subjective outcome score for the patient is generated as an output of the machine learning model. The intraocular lens is selected based in part on the predicted subjective outcome score.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system for selecting an intraocular lens for implantation into an eye of a patient, the system comprising: a controller having a processor and a tangible, non-transitory memory on which instructions are recorded; wherein the controller is configured to selectively execute at least one machine learning model, the at least one machine learning model being trained with a training dataset which includes respective historical sets comprising each of respective pre-operative objective data, respective pre-operative personality data, respective intra-operative data, respective post-operative objective data, and respective subjective outcome data; wherein execution of the instructions by the processor causes the controller to: obtain pre-operative objective data for the patient, including one or more anatomic eye measurements; obtain pre-operative questionnaire data for the patient, including at least one personality trait; enter the pre-operative objective data and the pre-operative questionnaire data as respective inputs to the at least one machine learning model and generate a predicted subjective outcome score for the patient as an output of the at least one machine learning model; and select the intraocular lens based in part on the predicted subjective outcome score. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein: the at least one machine learning model includes a neural network. 3. The system of claim 1 , wherein: the at least one personality trait of the patient is represented as at least one of a numerical scale of agreeability or as a binary result, the binary result being either predominantly agreeable or predominantly non-agreeable. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein: the pre-operative questionnaire data further includes a lifestyle needs assessment for the patient. 5. The system of claim 1 , further comprising: an integrated diagnostic device configured to obtain the pre-operative objective data; and wherein the pre-operative objective data further includes refractive eye measurements and physiologic eye measurements. 6. The system of claim 1 , further comprising: a data management module accessible to the controller, the data management module being configured to collect the respective historical sets from a plurality of electronic medical record units. 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein: the respective subjective outcome data in the respective historical sets includes a numerical satisfaction scale. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to: quantify a correlation of the respective post-operative objective data to the respective subjective outcome score in the respective historical sets; and identify the respective post-operative objective data most strongly correlating with the respective subjective outcome score. 9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to: identify and screen out the respective historical sets having at least one variable in the respective pre-operative objective data matching with a predefined confounding parameter. 10. A method of selecting an intraocular lens for implantation in an eye, the method comprising: receiving, via a controller, pre-operative objective data for a patient, including one or more anatomic eye measurements; receiving, via the controller, pre-operative questionnaire data for the patient, including at least one personality trait; executing an at least one machine learning model with the preoperative objective data and the pre-operative questionnaire data as respective inputs, via the controller, the at least one machine learning model being trained with a training dataset which includes each of respective historical sets composed of respective pre-operative objective data, respective pre-operative personality data, respective intra-operative data, respective post-operative objective data, and respective subjective outcome data; generating, as an output of the at least one machine learning model, a predicted subjective outcome score for the patient; and selecting the intraocular lens based in part on the predicted subjective outcome score. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein: representing the at least one personality trait of the patient as at least one of a numerical scale of agreeability or as a binary result, the binary result being either predominantly agreeable or predominantly non-agreeable. 12. The method of claim 10 , wherein: the pre-operative questionnaire data further includes a lifestyle needs assessment for the patient. 13. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: obtaining, from an integrated diagnostic device, the pre-operative objective data; and wherein the pre-operative objective data further includes refractive eye measurements and physiologic eye measurements. 14. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: collecting, via a data management module, the respective historical sets from a plurality of electronic medical record units; and delivering the respective historical sets to the at least one machine learning module. 15. The method of claim 10 , wherein: the respective subjective outcome data in the respective historical sets includes a numerical satisfaction scale. 16. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: assessing a respective correlation of the respective post-operative objective data to the respective subjective outcome score in the respective historical sets, via the controller; and identifying the respective post-operative objective data most strongly correlating with the respective subjective outcome score, via the controller.
Supervised learning · CPC title
Feedforward networks · CPC title
Computer aided selection or customisation of medical implants or cutting guides · CPC title
for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems · CPC title
characterised by electronic signal processing, e.g. eye models · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.