Saliency mapping by feature reduction and perturbation modeling in medical imaging
US-2021174497-A1 · Jun 10, 2021 · US
US12299082B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12299082-B2 |
| Application number | US-202418599029-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 7, 2024 |
| Priority date | Jun 28, 2021 |
| Publication date | May 13, 2025 |
| Grant date | May 13, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method of balancing a dataset for a machine learning model includes identifying confusing classes of few-shot classes for a machine learning model during validation. One of the confusing classes and an image from one of the few-shot classes are selected. An image perturbation is computed such that the selected image is classified as the selected confusing class. The selected image is modified with the computed perturbation. The modified selected image is added to a batch for training the machine learning model.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method of balancing a dataset for a machine learning model, the method comprising: accessing a machine learning model implemented in a computing system; identifying confusing classes of few-shot classes for the machine learning model during validation; selecting one of the confusing classes; selecting an image from one of the few-shot classes; computing an image perturbation such that the selected image is classified as the selected confusing class, wherein the image perturbation is computed by applying a sequence of additive image perturbations; modifying the selected image with the computed perturbation; and adding the modified selected image to the one few-shot class for training the machine learning model. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the image perturbation is computed using a gradient-ascent technique that propagates a gradient to an input image. 3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising computing a pixel update based on the gradient. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the selected image is modified by maximizing a posterior probability or logit of a non-true class given an input image. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one confusing class is selected by: computing a probability distribution over all classes using confusion matrix scores for a tail class; and using the computed probability distribution to sample for a confusing class. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein a minimum class score is computed by randomly choosing a confidence value from within 0.15 and 0.25. 7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the gradient-ascent technique is executed with a learning rate δ=0.7. 8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising stopping the gradient-ascent technique when S c′ (I′)≥S c′ or when 15 iterations is reached. 9. A computing system, comprising: one or more processors; and a computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereupon which, when executed by the processor, cause the computing system to perform operations comprising: selecting a confusing class of few-shot classes for a machine learning model; selecting an image from one of the few-shot classes; computing an image perturbation such that the selected image is classified as the selected confusing class, wherein the image perturbation is computed using a gradient-ascent technique that propagates a gradient to an input image; modifying the selected image with the computed perturbation; and adding the modified selected image to a batch for training the machine learning model. 10. The computing system of claim 9 , wherein the image perturbation is computed using a gradient-ascent technique that propagates a gradient to an input image. 11. The computing system of claim 10 , further comprising computing a pixel update based on the gradient. 12. The computing system of claim 9 , wherein the selected image is modified by maximizing a posterior probability or logit of a non-true class given an input image. 13. The computing system of claim 9 , wherein the one confusing class is selected by: computing a probability distribution over all classes using confusion matrix scores for a tail class; and using the computed probability distribution to sample for a confusing class. 14. A computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereupon which, when executed by one or more processors of a computing device, cause the computing device to perform operations comprising: accessing a machine learning model implemented in a computing system; identifying confusing classes of few-shot classes for the machine learning model during validation; selecting one of the confusing classes; selecting an image from one of the few-shot classes; computing an image perturbation such that the selected image is classified as the selected confusing class, wherein the image perturbation is computed by applying a sequence of additive image perturbations; modify the selected image with the computed perturbation; and adding the modified selected image to a batch for training the machine learning model. 15. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein a minimum class score is computed by randomly choosing a confidence value from within 0.15 and 0.25. 16. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the image perturbation is computed using a gradient-ascent technique that propagates a gradient to an input image. 17. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein: the gradient-ascent technique is executed with a learning rate δ=0.7. 18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , further comprising stopping the gradient-ascent technique when S c′ (I′)≥S c′ or when 15 iterations is reached. 19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , further comprising computing a pixel update based on the gradient. 20. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the selected image is modified by maximizing a posterior probability or logit of a non-true class given an input image.
Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology · CPC title
Learning methods · CPC title
Transfer learning · CPC title
Adversarial learning · CPC title
Convolutional networks [CNN, ConvNet] · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.