Dynamic input system for smart glasses based on user availability states
US-12183074-B2 · Dec 31, 2024 · US
US12280786B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12280786-B2 |
| Application number | US-202318319037-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 17, 2023 |
| Priority date | May 17, 2023 |
| Publication date | Apr 22, 2025 |
| Grant date | Apr 22, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system for identifying adversarial behavior directed to an autonomous vehicle includes a pedestrian detection system in communication with a vehicle controller adapted to identify a pedestrian within proximity of the autonomous vehicle, track the pedestrian, determine if the pedestrian is intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle, and if the pedestrian tracking system determines that the pedestrian is not intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle, the pedestrian tracking system is further adapted to continue tracking the pedestrian, and if the pedestrian tracking system determines that the pedestrian is intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle, the pedestrian tracking system is further adapted to determine, with an adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method of identifying adversarial behavior directed to an autonomous vehicle, comprising: identifying, with a pedestrian detection system in communication with a vehicle controller, a pedestrian within proximity of the autonomous vehicle; tracking the pedestrian with the pedestrian tracking system; determining, with the pedestrian tracking system, if the pedestrian is intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle; if the pedestrian tracking system determines that the pedestrian is not intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle, continuing tracking of the pedestrian with the pedestrian tracking system; and if the pedestrian tracking system determines that the pedestrian is intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle, determining, with an adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior. 2. The method of claim 1 , further including: if the pedestrian tracking system determines that the pedestrian is intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle, determining, with the vehicle controller, if the autonomous vehicle has right of way, and: if the autonomous vehicle does not have the right of way, continuing tracking of the pedestrian with the pedestrian tracking system; and if the autonomous vehicle does have the right of way, determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the determining, with the vehicle controller, if the autonomous vehicle has a right of way further includes: determining, with the vehicle controller, what type of crossing is present in front of the autonomous vehicle, to be used by the pedestrian; identifying, with the vehicle controller, crossing signals for the identified crossing type; and determining, with the vehicle controller, if the autonomous vehicle has the right of way based on the identified crossing signals. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior further includes determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior based on at least one of spatiotemporally analyzing the crossing behavior of the pedestrian, non-verbal cues from the pedestrian and audible cues. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior based on the crossing behavior of the pedestrian further includes: calculating, with the vehicle controller, an estimated crossing time for the pedestrian to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle; determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, that the pedestrian is not exhibiting any adversarial behavior when the pedestrian finishes crossing in front of the autonomous vehicle within a predetermined time window; and determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, that the pedestrian is exhibiting adversarial behavior when the pedestrian does not finish crossing in front of the autonomous vehicle within the predetermined time window. 6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior based on non-verbal cues from the pedestrian further includes: identifying, with the pedestrian tracking system, physical properties of the pedestrian; analyzing, with the vehicle controller, spatiotemporal characteristics of the physical properties of the pedestrian; and determining, with the vehicle controller, if any physical properties of the pedestrian indicate adversarial behavior by the pedestrian. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the analyzing, with the vehicle controller, spatiotemporal characteristics of the physical properties of the pedestrian further includes: identifying, with the pedestrian tracking system, key points of a hand of the pedestrian; comparing, with the vehicle controller, identified key points of the hand of the pedestrian to a remote database of known threatening gestures; and determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, that the pedestrian is exhibiting adversarial behavior when the identified key points of the hand of the pedestrian match at least one of the known threatening gestures within the remote database. 8. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior based on audible cues further includes: capturing, with an external microphone, acoustic signals from the pedestrian; extracting, with the vehicle controller, features of the acoustic signals; and comparing, with the vehicle controller, features of the acoustic signals to a remote database which includes an optimized model of known sounds that indicate adversarial behavior; and determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, that the pedestrian is exhibiting adversarial behavior when the captured acoustic signals match known sounds that indicate adversarial behavior. 9. The method of claim 4 , wherein, the determining, with the adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior based on at least one of crossing behavior of the pedestrian, non-verbal cues from the pedestrian and audible cues further includes using an information fusion algorithm within the vehicle controller to combine information related to the crossing behavior of the pedestrian, information related to non-verbal cues from the pedestrian and audible cues to identify adversarial behavior. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein, when the pedestrian is exhibiting adversarial behavior, the method further includes: classifying, with a persistence algorithm, the adversarial behavior as “no risk” when a duration of such adversarial behavior is less than a first pre-determined length of time; classifying, with the persistence algorithm, the adversarial behavior as “low risk” when the duration of such adversarial behavior is greater than the first pre-determined length of time and less than a second pre-determined length of time; and classifying, with the persistence algorithm, the adversarial behavior as “high risk” when the duration of such adversarial behavior is greater than the second pre-determined length of time. 11. A system for identifying adversarial behavior directed to an autonomous vehicle, comprising: a pedestrian detection system in communication with a vehicle controller, adapted to: identify a pedestrian within proximity of the autonomous vehicle; track the pedestrian; determine if the pedestrian is intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle; and: if the pedestrian tracking system determines that the pedestrian is not intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle, the pedestrian tracking system is further adapted to continue tracking the pedestrian; and if the pedestrian tracking system determines that the pedestrian is intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle, the pedestrian tracking system is further adapted to determine, with an adversarial intent algorithm, if the pedestrian is exhibiting any adversarial behavior. 12. The system of claim 11 , wherein, if the pedestrian tracking system determines that the pedestrian is intending to cross in front of the autonomous vehicle, the pedestrian tracking system is further adapted to determine, with the vehicle controller, if the autonomous vehicle has right of way, and: if the autonomous vehicle does not have the right of way, the pedestrian tracking system is further adapted to con
Pedestrians · CPC title
External transmission of data to or from the vehicle · CPC title
Audio sensitive means, e.g. ultrasound · CPC title
Road markings, e.g. lane marker or crosswalk · CPC title
Behavior, e.g. aggressive or erratic · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.