Method for controlling a vehicle and distance regulation control device

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-12194997-B2
Application number	US-202017773624-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Nov 2, 2020
Priority date	Nov 8, 2019
Publication date	Jan 14, 2025
Grant date	Jan 14, 2025

Abstract

A method for controlling a subject vehicle with a braking system, a drive system and a distance control system, wherein the distance control system is configured to control an actual following distance between the subject vehicle and a vehicle ahead to a predetermined target following distance, wherein the target following distance is predetermined as a function of an activated operating mode of the distance control system, including performing a plausibility check by checking whether V2X data is exchanged or can be exchanged between the vehicle ahead and the subject vehicle over a V2X connection, and activating, if no V2X data is exchanged or can be exchanged between the vehicle ahead and the subject vehicle over the V2X connection, a first operating mode in which a first target following distance is predetermined as a function of a reaction time of a driver of the subject vehicle.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A method for controlling a subject vehicle with a braking system, a drive system and a distance control system, wherein the distance control system is configured to control an actual following distance between the subject vehicle and a vehicle ahead to a predetermined target following distance, wherein the target following distance is predetermined as a function of an activated operating mode of the distance control system, comprising:
performing a plausibility check by checking whether V2X data is exchanged or can be exchanged between the vehicle ahead and the subject vehicle over a V2X connection;
activating, based on a determination that no V2X data is exchanged or can be exchanged between the vehicle ahead and the subject vehicle over the V2X connection, a first operating mode in which a first target following distance is predetermined as a function of a reaction time of a driver of the subject vehicle,
activating, based on a determination that V2X data is exchanged or can be exchanged between the vehicle ahead and the subject vehicle over the V2X connection, a second operating mode in which a second target following distance is predetermined independently of the reaction time of the driver of the subject vehicle,
wherein the first target following distance is compared with the second target following distance and/or the reaction time of the driver of the subject vehicle is compared with a latency time indicating the time for transmitting the V2X data between the subject vehicle and the vehicle ahead via the V2X connection, and
wherein the second operating mode is activated based on a determination that the second target following distance is set equal to the first target following distance or wherein the first operating mode is activated automatically based on a determination that the second target following distance is longer than the first target following distance and/or the latency time is longer than the reaction time of the driver of the vehicle.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , comprising:
checking whether the vehicle ahead is in a same lane as the subject vehicle by comparing a global vehicle ahead position with a global subject vehicle position, wherein the global vehicle ahead position is derived from the V2X data transmitted via the V2X connection; and
activating, the second operating mode based on a determination that the vehicle ahead is in the same lane as the subject vehicle.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the plausibility check further comprises checking whether the actual following distance between the subject vehicle and the vehicle ahead remains approximately the same, and wherein the second operating mode is activated if based on a determination that the actual following distance between the subject vehicle and the vehicle ahead remains approximately the same.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the plausibility check further comprises checking whether the vehicle ahead is in a field of view of a camera of the subject vehicle and recognizing whether the vehicle ahead is in the same lane as the subject vehicle on the basis of camera data of the camera, and wherein the second operating mode is activated based on a determination that if the vehicle ahead is in the same lane as the subject vehicle on the basis of camera data of the camera.

5. The method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein the plausibility check further comprises checking whether driving dynamics information, including a vehicle ahead target deceleration and/or an actual vehicle ahead speed, matches the camera data output by the camera, and/or checking whether the actual following distance determined by the distance control system can be derived from camera data output by the camera, and wherein the second operating mode is activated based on a determination that the driving dynamics information matches the camera data output by the camera and/or based on a determination that the actual following distance determined by the distance control system can be derived from the camera data.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plausibility check for activating the second operating mode is carried out over a plausibility check period.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the plausibility check further comprises establishing that the subject vehicle and the vehicle ahead intend to drive in a convoy mode with the actual following distance relative to each other without taking into account the reaction time of the driver of the subject vehicle.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the reaction time of the driver of the subject vehicle is between 0.8 s and 1.5 s.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:
the first target following distance follows from a first minimum safety distance which takes into account at least one reaction distance, and
the second target following distance follows from a second minimum safety distance, which takes into account at least one latency distance and does not take into account the at least one reaction distance,
the at least one reaction distance is determined from the reaction time of the driver of the subject vehicle, taking into account a current subject vehicle actual speed, and
the at least one latency distance is determined at least from a plausibility time, taking into account the current actual vehicle speed, wherein the latency time indicates the time for transmitting the V2X data between the subject vehicle and the vehicle ahead via the V2X connection.

10. The method as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the first and second minimum safety distance further take into account a braking safety distance, wherein the braking safety distance follows from a braking capacity of each of the vehicle ahead and the subject vehicle.

11. The method as claimed in claim 9 , wherein:
the first target following distance also follows from a sum of the first minimum safety distance, at least taking into account the reaction distance, and an additional distance selected by the driver; and
the second target following distance also follows from a sum of the second minimum safety distance, at least taking into account the at least one latency distance and not taking into account the reaction distance, and the additional distance selected by the driver.

12. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:
determining whether the second target following distance is greater than the first target following distance and/or the latency time is greater than the reaction time of the driver of the subject vehicle; and
warning the driver with a visual, acoustic, and/or haptic warning based on a determination that the second target following distance is greater than the first target following distance and/or the latency time is greater than the reaction time of the driver of the subject vehicle.

13. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:
activating an activation device to permit the plausibility check, wherein the activation device is a switch arranged in the subject vehicle which can be temporarily or permanently activated by the driver.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the first operating mode is automatically activated or maintained based on the activation device being deactivated.

15. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising deactivating the second operating mode based on the driver operating a brake pedal and/or an accelerator pedal.

16. The method as claimed in claim 15 , further comprising deactivating the distance control system or activating the first operating mode

Assignees

• Zf Cv Systems Global Gmbh

Inventors

• Dieckmann Thomas

Classifications

• B60W2420/408

  Radar; Laser, e.g. lidar · CPC title

• B60W2420/403

  Image sensing, e.g. optical camera · CPC title

• G08G1/22

  Platooning, i.e. convoy of communicating vehicles · CPC title

• B60W2540/12

  Brake pedal position · CPC title

• B60W2540/10

  Accelerator pedal position · CPC title