Method and apparatus for performing irradiation time optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy during treatment planning while maintaining acceptable irradiation plan quality
US-11154726-B2 · Oct 26, 2021 · US
US12186586B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12186586-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117408204-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 20, 2021 |
| Priority date | Sep 28, 2018 |
| Publication date | Jan 7, 2025 |
| Grant date | Jan 7, 2025 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer implemented method of determining a resultant treatment plan for a proton radiation therapy system based on given dose volume constraints, wherein the resultant treatment plan is optimized for treatment time comprises accessing the dose volume constraints and range information, wherein the range information indicates acceptable deviations from the dose volume constraints. Based on the proton radiation therapy system, the method further comprises accessing machine configuration information comprising a plurality of machine parameters that define a maximum resolution achievable in irradiating a patient. Further, the method comprises iteratively adjusting the plurality of machine parameters to values which decrease the maximum resolution and simulating a plurality of candidate treatment plans to generate a plurality of treatment plan results, wherein each treatment plan result comprises: a respective treatment time and a respective plan quality. Finally, the method comprises selecting a resultant treatment plan with the shortest treatment time.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer implemented method of determining a resultant treatment plan for a proton radiation therapy system, the computer implemented method comprising: accessing dose volume constraints and a plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters associated with the proton radiation therapy system, wherein each of the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters is operable to be varied over a different range, and wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters are associated with beam characteristics of the proton radiation therapy system; adjusting the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters to generate a plurality of candidate treatment plans; simulating the plurality of candidate treatment plans to generate a plurality of treatment plan results, wherein each treatment plan result includes a respective treatment time and a respective plan quality, and wherein the simulating includes conducting one or more simulations using values selected across a respective range for each of the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters; and selecting, from the plurality of candidate treatment plans, the resultant treatment plan with a shortest treatment time and an acceptable plan quality with respect to the dose volume constraints. 2. The computer implemented method as described in claim 1 , wherein the accessing the dose volume constraints comprises: accessing range information for the dose volume constraints, wherein the range information indicates acceptable deviations from the dose volume constraints. 3. The computer implemented method as described in claim 1 , wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters are operable to be varied to achieve a maximum resolution achievable by the proton radiation therapy system in irradiating a patient, and the adjusting includes adjusting the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters to values which decrease the maximum resolution. 4. The computer implemented method as described in claim 1 , wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters include minimal monitor unit (MU) per spot. 5. The computer implemented method as described in claim 4 , wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters further includes a number of available energies and a step size between the available energies, wherein both the number of available energies and the step size between the available energies are operable to be varied. 6. The computer implemented method as described in claim 5 , wherein an energy level of the available energies corresponds to a depth within a treatment region associated with a resultant treatment plan reachable by a beam produced by the proton radiation therapy system. 7. The computer implemented method as described in claim 5 , wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters further includes a spot lateral spread. 8. The computer implemented method as described in claim 5 , wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters further includes a spot lateral spread, and varying the spot lateral spread includes varying a spot size associated with a beam produced by the proton radiation therapy system. 9. The computer implemented method as described in claim 7 , wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters further includes a spot positioning. 10. The computer implemented method as described in claim 7 , wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters further includes a spot positioning, and varying the spot positioning includes varying a spacing between spots associated with a beam produced by the proton radiation therapy system. 11. The computer implemented method as described in claim 1 , wherein the acceptable plan quality is defined as a plan quality that deviates from the dose volume constraints within a range, and the range includes acceptable deviations from the dose volume constraints. 12. The computer implemented method as described in claim 1 , further comprising: loading the resultant treatment plan into the proton radiation therapy system; and using the proton radiation therapy system, as configured by the resultant treatment plan, to irradiate a patient. 13. The computer implemented method as described in claim 1 , wherein the accessing the dose volume constraints comprises: accessing range information for the dose volume constraints, wherein the range information for the dose volume constraints indicates acceptable deviations from the dose volume constraints, and wherein the range information for the dose volume constraints includes PTV coverage between a lower bound percentage and an upper bound percentage, and a dose maximum below a bound percentage. 14. The computer implemented method as described in claim 1 , wherein the proton radiation therapy system is associated with one or more of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), RapidArc™ radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). 15. A computer system comprising: a processor coupled to a bus; and a memory coupled to the bus, the memory being programmed with instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to access dose volume constraints and a plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters associated with a proton radiation therapy system, wherein each of the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters is operable to be varied over a different range, and wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters are associated with beam characteristics of the proton radiation therapy system, adjust the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters to generate a plurality of candidate treatment plans, simulate the plurality of candidate treatment plans to generate a plurality of treatment plan results, wherein each treatment plan result includes a respective treatment time and a respective plan quality, and wherein simulating the plurality of candidate treatment plans includes conducting one or more simulations using values selected across a respective range for each of the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters, and select, from the plurality of candidate treatment plans, the resultant treatment plan with a shortest treatment time and an acceptable plan quality with respect to the dose volume constraints. 16. The computer system as described in claim 15 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to access the dose volume constraints by accessing range information for the dose volume constraints, wherein the range information indicates acceptable deviations from the dose volume constraints. 17. The computer system as described in claim 15 , wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters are operable to be varied to achieve a maximum resolution achievable by the proton radiation therapy system in irradiating a patient, and wherein the plurality of different beam-specific machine parameters are adjusted to values which decrease the maximum resolution. 18. The computer system as described in claim 15 , wherein the acceptable plan quality is defined as a plan quality that deviates from the dose volume constraints within a range, and wherein the range includes acceptable deviations from the dose volume constraints. 19. A computer implemented me
Ions; Protons · CPC title
relating to mechanical, radiation or invasive therapies, e.g. surgery, laser therapy, dialysis or acupuncture · CPC title
using a specific method of dose optimization · CPC title
Treatment planning systems · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.