Self learning firewall policy enforcer
US-2024179158-A1 · May 30, 2024 · US
US12177262B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12177262-B2 |
| Application number | US-202418620734-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 28, 2024 |
| Priority date | Apr 24, 2023 |
| Publication date | Dec 24, 2024 |
| Grant date | Dec 24, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Zero trust and micro-segmentation techniques may be collectively used to enhance network security. To establish, refine, and enforce a zero-trust least-privileged policy, the network may be segmented to put each device of the network into a respective network of one, which forces all network traffic to pass through a zero-trust gatekeeper. The gatekeeper may then monitor and analyze the traffic to establish, refine, and enforce the zero-trust least-privileged policy, which reduces network access to only a limited set of network actions and/or paths. Using the gatekeeper, network traffic may be monitored to progressively establish the policy as well as to continually refine the policy. Recommended actions may be determined based on the analysis of the monitored network traffic and provided to the user to allow user feedback on the communication rules of zero-trust policy.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A zero-trust microsegmentation method comprising: collecting, using a plurality of zero-trust agents, information associated with devices of a network, wherein each of the devices of network include a respective one of the plurality of zero-trust agents, the collected information being based on respective device traffic traversing the zero-trust agents, wherein each of the zero-trust agents is executing on its respective one of the devices of the network; determining, using the plurality of zero-trust agents and based on the collected information, a plurality of network microsegments, wherein each of the devices are within at least one the plurality of network microsegments; determining an initial zero-trust security policy in which communication permissions for the devices of the network are denied by default unless otherwise allowed, the communication permissions including one or more communication dimensions; analyzing, using the plurality of zero-trust agents, network traffic traversing the plurality of zero-trust agents under the initial zero-trust security policy; and adapting the initial zero-trust security policy, based on the analysis of the network traffic traversing the plurality of zero-trust agents under the initial zero-trust security policy, to adjust the communication permissions for the one or more communication dimensions to generate an adapted zero-trust security policy including one or more modifications to the one or more communication dimensions. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising enforcing, by the plurality of zero-trust agents, the initial and/or adapted zero-trust security policies on the network traffic traversing the plurality of zero-trust agents. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the devices, based on its respective one of the plurality of zero-trust agents, are its own atomic network. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: analyzing, using the plurality of zero-trust agents, network traffic under the adapted zero-trust security policy; and adapting the adapted zero-trust security policy, based on the analysis of the network traffic under the adapted zero-trust security policy, to adjust the communication permissions for another of the one or more communication dimensions to generate a further adapted zero-trust security policy including one or more modifications to the other of the one or more communication dimensions; and implementing, using the plurality of zero-trust agents, the further adapted zero-trust security policy. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising iteratively performing: the analyzing network traffic under the adapted zero-trust security policy, the adapting the adapted zero-trust security policy, and the implementing the further adapted zero-trust security policy. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more communication dimensions comprise: an internet-intranet dimension defining a restrictiveness distinction between internet traffic and intranet traffic; an input-output dimension defining a restrictiveness distinction between input traffic and output traffic; a segment dimension defining a restrictiveness distinction between inter-segment traffic and intra-segment traffic; a port dimension defining a port-based traffic restrictiveness distinction; a path dimension defining a communication path-based traffic restrictiveness distinction; a user dimension defining a user-based traffic restrictiveness distinction; a user group-based traffic restrictiveness distinction; an inter-group dimension defining am inter-group traffic restrictiveness distinction; and/or an intra-group dimension defining an intra-group traffic restrictiveness distinction. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein adapting the initial zero-trust security policy comprises progressively increasing a restrictiveness of the one or more communication dimensions for the initial zero-trust security policy to generate the adapted zero-trust security policy, wherein between each progressive increase in restrictiveness, an incremental zero-trust security policy is implemented for a current progression, network traffic under the incremental zero-trust security policy is analyzed, and a next progression with increased restrictiveness is based on the analysis of the network traffic under the incremental zero-trust security policy. 8. A zero-trust network communication method comprising: collecting, using a plurality of zero-trust agents, information associated with devices of a network, wherein each of the devices of network include a respective one of the plurality of zero-trust agents, the collected information being based on respective device traffic traversing the zero-trust agents, wherein each of the zero-trust agents is executing on its respective one of the devices of the network; determining, using the zero-trust agents and based on the collected information, an initial zero-trust security policy including communication permissions; analyzing, using the plurality of zero-trust agents, network traffic traversing the plurality of zero-trust agents under the communication permissions of the initial zero-trust security policy; adapting one or more of the communication permissions, based on the analysis of the network traffic traversing the plurality of zero-trust agents under the initial zero-trust security policy, to generate an adapted zero-trust security policy including the one or more adapted communication permissions. 9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising iteratively performing: the analyzing network traffic, and adapting one or more of the communication permissions based on the analysis of the network traffic. 10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the initial zero-trust security policy is configured to deny network traffic for the devices of the network by default unless otherwise allowed. 11. The method of claim 8 , wherein adapting the one or more of the communication permissions comprises removing the one or more of the communication permissions from the initial zero-trust security policy to generate the adapted zero-trust security policy. 12. The method of claim 8 , further comprising determining a suggested modification the one or more of the communication permissions based on the analysis of the network traffic. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the adapting the one or more of the communication permissions is based on feedback responsive to the suggested modification. 14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the feedback comprises acceptance or rejection of the suggested modification. 15. A zero-trust microsegmentation method comprising: collecting, using a plurality of zero-trust agents, information associated with devices of a network, wherein each of the devices of network include a respective one of the plurality of zero-trust agents, the collected information being based on respective device traffic traversing the zero-trust agents, wherein each of the zero-trust agents is executing on its respective one of the devices of the network; determining, using the plurality of zero-trust agents and based on the collected information, network microsegments, where each network microsegment includes one or more of the devices; and providing, using the plurality of zero-trust agents, a zero-trust security policy in which communication permissions for network traffic traversing the devices of the network are denied by default, by the plurality of zero-trust agents, unless otherwise allowed. 16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising: analyzing, using the plurality of zero-trust agents, the network traffi
Rule management · CPC title
Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection · CPC title
Filtering policies (mail message filtering H04L51/212) · CPC title
involving negotiation or determination of the one or more network security mechanisms to be used, e.g. by negotiation between the client and the server or between peers or by selection according to the capabilities of the entities involved (negotiation of communication capabilities H04L69/24) · CPC title
Filtering by address, protocol, port number or service, e.g. IP-address or URL · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.