Objective training and evaluation

US12107995B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-12107995-B2
Application numberUS-202318458278-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateAug 30, 2023
Priority dateOct 24, 2019
Publication dateOct 1, 2024
Grant dateOct 1, 2024

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A system and method configured to generate a simulated caller dialog including a caller intended issue for a scenario for testing a customer service representative (CSR). A simulated caller dialog is presented to the CSR and a CSR response to the simulated caller dialog is received and includes a CSR interpretation of the caller intended issue to the simulated caller dialog. An understanding determination result based on an intent determination recognition score is generated by an intent determination recognition model is generated in response to a comparison of the CSR interpretation of the caller intended issue matching the caller intended issue in the simulated caller dialog. A CSR score is generated for the scenario based on the understanding determination result. The CSR score is recorded to a database.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving an agent's response to at least a portion of a dialog for a scenario, the agent's response including an agent's interpretation of an intended issue in the at least the portion of the dialog; generating an intent determination recognition score, the intent determination recognition score generated by an intent determination recognition model; in response to the intent determination recognition score indicating incorrect identification of the intended issue, generating a response suggestion based on the agent's response and providing the response suggestion to the agent, the response suggestion including a behavioral indication to increase empathy in a subsequent response to a subsequent restatement of the at least the portion of the dialog; and generating an agent score for the scenario based on the intent determination recognition score and an empathy recognition score generated by an empathy recognition model, the empathy recognition model coupled to receive the agent's response, the empathy recognition score generated at least in part based on an evaluation of word content in the agent's response to the dialog. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the dialog is simulated dialog for the scenario, and wherein the simulated dialog includes a known intended issue. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating accolade feedback to the agent in response to the agent correctly identifying the intended issue. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: restating the at least the portion of the dialog in response to the agent incorrectly identifying the intended issue in the response. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the intent determination recognition model generating the intent determination recognition score comprises: comparing words in the agent's response with words in the at least the portion of the dialog; and generating the intent determination recognition score in response to an outcome of the comparison of the words in the agent's response with the words in the at least the portion of the dialog. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , further comprising: generating a facial emotional recognition score using a facial emotional recognition model, the facial emotional recognition score in response to the facial emotional recognition model determining a level of emotional recognition in the agent response to the at least the portion of the dialog; and augmenting the agent score based on the facial emotional recognition score. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , further comprising: generating an empathy keyword usage recognition score using an empathy keyword recognition model, the empathy keyword usage recognition score in response to the empathy keyword recognition model determining a level of empathy keyword usage in the agent's response to the at least the portion of the dialog; and augmenting the agent score based on the empathy keyword usage recognition score. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , further comprising: generating an expected keyword usage recognition score using an expected keyword recognition model, the expected keyword usage recognition score using the expected keyword recognition model determining a level of expected keyword usage in the agent's response to the at least the portion of the dialog; and augmenting the agent score based on the expected keyword usage recognition score. 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the generating of the agent score further comprises: generating a leaderboard providing the agent score of the agent with respect to previous scores of other agents. 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the intended issue relates to one of a member, patient, or service provider. 11. A system, comprising: one or more processors; and a memory storing instructions that, when executed, cause the one or more processors to: receive an agent's response to at least a portion of a dialog for a scenario, the agent's response including an agent's interpretation of an intended issue in the at least the portion of the dialog; generate an intent determination recognition score, the intent determination recognition score generated by an intent determination recognition model; in response to the intent determination recognition score indicating incorrect identification of the intended issue, generate a response suggestion based on the agent's response and providing the response suggestion to the agent, the response suggestion including a behavioral indication to increase empathy in a subsequent response to a subsequent restatement of the at least the portion of the dialog; and generate an agent score for the scenario based on the intent determination recognition score and an empathy recognition score generated by an empathy recognition model, the empathy recognition model coupled to receive the agent's response, the empathy recognition score generated at least in part based on an evaluation of word content in the agent's response to the dialog. 12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the dialog is simulated dialog for the scenario, and wherein the simulated dialog includes a known intended issue. 13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to: generating accolade feedback to the agent in response to the agent correctly identifying the intended issue. 14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to: restating the at least the portion of the dialog in response to the agent incorrectly identifying the intended issue in the response. 15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the intent determination recognition model generating the intent determination recognition score comprises: comparing words in the agent's response with words in the at least the portion of the dialog; and generating the intent determination recognition score in response to an outcome of the comparison of the words in the agent's response with the words in the at least the portion of the dialog. 16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to: generating a facial emotional recognition score using a facial emotional recognition model, the facial emotional recognition score in response to the facial emotional recognition model determining a level of emotional recognition in the agent response to the at least the portion of the dialog; and augmenting the agent score based on the facial emotional recognition score. 17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to: generating an empathy keyword usage recognition score using an empathy keyword recognition model, the empathy keyword usage recognition score in response to the empathy keyword recognition model determining a level of empathy keyword usage in the agent's response to the at least the portion of the dialog; and augmenting the agent score based on the empathy keyword usage recognition score. 18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to: generating an expected keyword usage recognition score using an expected keyword recognition model, the expected keyword usage recognition score using the expected keyword recognition model determining a level of expected keyword usage in the agent's response to the at least the portion of the dialog; and augment

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US12107995B2 cover?
A system and method configured to generate a simulated caller dialog including a caller intended issue for a scenario for testing a customer service representative (CSR). A simulated caller dialog is presented to the CSR and a CSR response to the simulated caller dialog is received and includes a CSR interpretation of the caller intended issue to the simulated caller dialog. An understanding de…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Cvs Pharmacy Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification H04M3/5175. Mapped technology areas include Electricity.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Oct 01 2024 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 12 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).