System and method for mitigating loads acting on a rotor blade of a wind turbine
US-2021115896-A1 · Apr 22, 2021 · US
US12098704B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12098704-B2 |
| Application number | US-202017071126-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 15, 2020 |
| Priority date | Oct 22, 2019 |
| Publication date | Sep 24, 2024 |
| Grant date | Sep 24, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for mitigating loads acting on a rotor blade of a wind turbine includes determining, via a state estimator of a controller, a blade state estimation of the rotor blade. The method also includes reconstructing, via the controller, one or more loading signals of the rotor blade from the blade state estimation using modal analysis such that the loading signal(s) include a lead time. Further, the method includes comparing the loading signal(s) of the rotor blade to a loading threshold. Moreover, the method includes implementing a control action based on the comparison such that the lead time provided by the loading signal(s) allows the control action to take effect before a damaging load occurs on the rotor blade.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for mitigating loads acting on a rotor blade of a wind turbine, the method comprising: determining, via a state estimator of a controller, a blade state estimation of the rotor blade based on measurement data from one or more sensors, the measurement data comprising one or more loading signals of the rotor blade; determining a blade tip deflection of the rotor blade based on the one or more loading signals, a flap-wise natural frequency of the rotor blade for a plurality of resonant modes, and a gain for the one or more loading signals of the rotor blade, wherein the one or more loading signals includes information used to interpret a lead time; estimating a future flap-wise blade tip deflection of the rotor blade for the plurality of resonant modes as a function of the measured tip deflection, the flap-wise natural frequency, and the gain for the one or more loading signals, wherein estimating the future flap-wise blade tip deflection of the rotor blade for the plurality of resonant modes comprises estimating the future flap-wise blade tip deflection of the rotor blade for a first resonant mode and a second resonant mode; and estimating a future blade bending moment as a function of the future flap-wise blade tip deflection of the rotor blade for the plurality of resonant modes; comparing the future blade bending moment to a bending moment threshold; and implementing a control action based on the comparison to mitigate the loads acting on the rotor blade. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more sensors comprise at least one of Micro Inertial Measurement Units (MIMUs), strain gauges, accelerometers, pressure sensors, vibration sensors, proximity sensors, or camera sensors. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the gain is a horizon gain. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein estimating the future blade bending moment as a function of the future flap-wise blade tip deflection of the rotor blade for the plurality of resonant modes further comprises: estimating the future blade bending moment as a function of the future flapwise blade tip deflection for the first resonant mode, the future flap-wise blade tip deflection for the second resonant mode, and one or more conversion constants. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein comparing the future blade bending moment of the rotor blade to the bending moment threshold further comprises comparing the future blade bending moment to the loading threshold. 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein implementing the control action based on the comparison further comprises adjusting a pitch angle of the rotor blade. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein adjusting the pitch angle of the rotor blade further comprises at least one of: determining an updated pitch angle limit for the rotor blade based on an expected reduction in the one or more loading signals when the future blade bending moment exceeds the loading threshold, and allowing a pitch angle limit to decay exponentially to an original pitch angle limit when the future blade bending moment is below the loading threshold. 8. A system for mitigating loads acting on a rotor blade of a wind turbine, the system comprising: one or more sensors configured to generate measurement data relating to the rotor blade; a controller communicatively coupled to the one or more sensors, the controller comprising a processor having a state estimator programmed therein, the controller configured to perform a plurality of operations, the plurality of operations comprising: determining, via the state estimator, a blade state estimation of the rotor blade based on the measurement data from the one or more sensors, the measurement data comprising one or more loading signals of the rotor blade; determining a measured tip deflection of the rotor blade based on the one or more loading signals, a flap-wise natural frequency of the rotor blade for a plurality of resonant modes, and a gain for the one or more loading signals of the rotor blade, wherein the one or more loading signals includes information used to interpret a lead time; estimating a future flap-wise blade tip deflection of the rotor blade for the plurality of resonant modes as a function of the measured tip deflection, the flap-wise natural frequency, and the gain for the one or more loading signals, wherein estimating the future flap-wise blade tip deflection of the rotor blade for the plurality of resonant modes comprises estimating the future flap-wise blade tip deflection of the rotor blade for a first resonant mode and a second resonant mode; and estimating a future blade bending moment as a function of the future flap-wise blade tip deflection of the rotor blade for the plurality of resonant modes; comparing the future blade bending moment to a bending moment threshold; and implementing a control action based on the comparison to mitigate the loads acting on the rotor blade. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more sensors comprise at least one of Micro Inertial Measurement Units (MIMUs), strain gauges, accelerometers, pressure sensors, vibration sensors, proximity sensors, or camera sensors. 10. The system of claim 8 , wherein implementing the control action based on the comparison further comprises adjusting a pitch angle of the rotor blade, wherein adjusting the pitch angle of the rotor blade further comprises at least one of: determining an updated pitch angle limit for the rotor blade based on an expected reduction in the one or more loading signals when the future blade bending moment exceeds the loading threshold, and allowing a pitch angle limit to decay exponentially to an original pitch angle limit when the future blade bending moment is below the loading threshold.
Strain gauges; Load cells · CPC title
active, predictive, or anticipative · CPC title
Maximum loads or fatigue criteria · CPC title
Adjusting of angle of incidence or attack of rotating blades · CPC title
with vertical axis · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.