Preemption of a container in a secure computation environment
US-10417453-B2 · Sep 17, 2019 · US
US12050719B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12050719-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117321089-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 14, 2021 |
| Priority date | Dec 14, 2015 |
| Publication date | Jul 30, 2024 |
| Grant date | Jul 30, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A container corresponding to executable code may be received. The container may be executed in a secure computation environment by performing one or more operations specified by the executable code of the container. An instruction to terminate the executing of the container may be received from a high level operating system (HLOS) that is external to the secure computation environment. A determination may be made as to whether the container is associated with a preemption privilege and the executing of the container may be terminated after receiving the instruction from the HLOS based on the determination of whether the container is associated with the preemption privilege.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: executing a container in a secure computation environment by performing one or more operations specified by executable code of the container; determining a number of containers in a container pipeline that have not yet been executed in the secure computation environment; determining whether the number of containers exceeds a threshold number of containers; terminating execution of the container after a first period of time has elapsed responsive to the number of containers not exceeding the threshold number of containers; and terminating execution of the container after a second period of time has elapsed responsive to the number of containers exceeding the threshold number of containers, wherein the second period of time is less than the first period of time. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first period of time is associated with a watchdog timer, wherein the watchdog timer corresponds to a maximum amount of time for the secure computation environment to execute the container. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first period of time is associated with a preemption privilege. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining that the container is associated with a preemption privilege by verifying a cryptographic signature of the container during execution of the container; and adding an amount of time to the first period of time or the second period of time responsive to a determination of the container being associated with the preemption privilege. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining whether the container is associated with the preemption privilege comprises: verifying that the cryptographic signature is from a root entity that is associated with the container. 6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving, from a high level operating system (HLOS) that is external to the secure computation environment, an instruction to terminate the executing of the container; and ignoring the instruction from the HLOS until the terminating the executing of the container after the second period of time has elapsed in response to determining that the container is associated with a preemption privilege. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining whether an operation of the one or more operations specified by the executable code of the container that is currently being performed corresponds to a modification of a resource associated with the secure computation environment, wherein the terminating of the executing of the container is further based on the determination of whether the operation that is currently being performed corresponds to the modification of the resource so that the terminating of the executing of the container is performed after a completion of the operation that corresponds to the modification of the resource. 8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the modification of the resource is a write operation to one-time programmable (OTP) memory. 9. A system comprising: a memory; and a processing device operatively coupled with the memory to: execute a container in a secure computation environment by performing one or more operations specified by executable code of the container; determine a number of containers in a container pipeline that have not yet been executed in the secure computation environment; determine whether the number of containers exceeds a threshold number of containers; terminate execution of the container after a first period of time has elapsed responsive to the number of containers not exceeding the threshold number of containers; and terminate execution of the container after a second period of time has elapsed responsive to the number of containers exceeding the threshold number of containers, wherein the second period of time is less than the first period of time. 10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the first period of time is associated with a watchdog timer, wherein the watchdog timer corresponds to a maximum amount of time for the secure computation environment to execute the container. 11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the processing device is further to: determine that the container is associated with a preemption privilege by verifying a cryptographic signature of the container during execution of the container, wherein, to terminate execution of the container, the processing device is further to terminate execution of the container further based on a determination of whether an operation of the one or more operations specified by the executable code of the container that is currently being performed corresponds to a modification of a resource so that termination of execution of the container is performed after a completion of the operation that corresponds to the modification of the resource. 12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the modification of the resource is a write operation to one-time programmable (OTP) memory. 13. The system of claim 11 , wherein to determine that the container is associated with the preemption privilege, the processing device is further to: verify that the cryptographic signature is from a root entity that is associated with the container; and add an amount of time to the first period of time or the second period of time in response to verifying the cryptographic signature. 14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the processing device is further to: receive, from a high level operating system (HLOS) that is external to the secure computation environment, an instruction to terminate the executing of the container; and ignore the instruction from the HLOS until the terminating execution of the container after the second period of time has elapsed in response to determining that the container is associated with a preemption privilege. 15. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processing device, cause the processing device to perform operations comprising: executing a container in a secure computation environment by performing one or more operations specified by executable code of the container; determining a number of containers in a container pipeline that have not yet been executed in the secure computation environment; determining whether the number of containers exceeds a threshold number of containers; terminating the executing of the container after a first period of time has elapsed responsive to the number of containers not exceeding the threshold number of containers; and terminating the executing of the container after a second period of time has elapsed responsive to the number of containers exceeding the threshold number of containers, wherein the second period of time is less than the first period of time. 16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the first period of time is associated with a watchdog timer, wherein the watchdog timer corresponds to a maximum amount of time for the secure computation environment to execute the container. 17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , the operations further comprising: determining that the container is associated with a preemption privilege by verifying a cryptographic signature of the container during execution of the container; and adding an amount of time to the first period of time or the second period of time responsive to a determination of the container being associated with the preemption privilege. 18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein determining whether the container
Certifying or maintaining trusted computer platforms, e.g. secure boots or power-downs, version controls, system software checks, secure updates or assessing vulnerabilities · CPC title
Program or device authentication · CPC title
during program execution, e.g. stack integrity {; Preventing unwanted data erasure; Buffer overflow} · CPC title
Suspend and resume; Hibernate and awake · CPC title
Providing cryptographic facilities or services · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.