One run reservoir evaluation and stimulation while drilling
US-2018334903-A1 · Nov 22, 2018 · US
US12037898B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12037898-B2 |
| Application number | US-202017594082-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 3, 2020 |
| Priority date | Apr 3, 2019 |
| Publication date | Jul 16, 2024 |
| Grant date | Jul 16, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method that includes lowering a formation testing tool into a wellbore intersecting a subterranean formation. The formation testing tool comprises an expandable member. The method also includes performing a pressuremeter test (PMT) by expanding the expandable member.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method comprising: lowering a formation testing tool into a wellbore intersecting a subterranean formation, wherein the formation testing tool comprises a first expandable member and a second expandable member; performing a first pressuremeter test (PMT) by expanding the first expandable member; and after performing the first PMT, performing a second PMT by expanding the second expandable member. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the formation testing tool is a wireline tool. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first expandable member and the second expandable member are each a packer inflated by downhole pumps. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising considering proper tool calibration and packer selection as a function of formation stiffness before test execution. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising analyzing data from the first PMT and the second PMT using a cavity expansion theory. 6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising validating interpretation of the analyzed data from the first PMT and the second PMT using rock mechanics laboratory tests results. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising integrating acoustic based estimation of dynamic elastic properties, comprising isotropic and anisotropic properties from wireline logging in order to establish appropriate dynamic-to-static transforms and support geomechanical properties and stress modelling. 8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing pressure data and pumped volume data obtained during the first PMT to a processor configured to generate a sleeve fracture plot, wherein one slope characterizes an elastic modulus and a second slope characterizes a limit pressure. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to use cavity expansion theory to generate an in situ stress-strain curve from the data obtained from the first PMT and derive a static shear modulus therefrom. 10. A method comprising: lowering a formation testing tool into a wellbore intersecting a subterranean formation, wherein the formation testing tool comprises a first expandable packer and a second expandable packer; performing a first pressuremeter test (PMT) test at a first depth, comprising inflating the first expandable packer, and acquiring first pressure and pumped volume data, and communicating the acquired first pressure and pumped volume data to a processor, wherein the processor is configured to plot a first sleeve fracture plot; after performing the first PMT, performing a second PMT test by inflating the second expandable packer, and acquiring second pressure and pumped volume data, and communicating the acquired second pressure and pumped volume data to the processor, wherein the processor is configured to plot a second sleeve fracture plot; and using the processor to derive a first static shear modulus using the first sleeve fracture plot and a second static shear modulus using the second sleeve fracture plot. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the formation testing tool is a wireline tool. 12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first static shear modulus is derived by analyzing the first sleeve fracture plot using a cavity expansion theory.
Measuring temperature or pressure · CPC title
Measuring wall stresses in the borehole · CPC title
Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.