Instrumented trail making task (iTMT)

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-12011282-B2
Application number	US-201716334571-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Sep 18, 2017
Priority date	Sep 19, 2016
Publication date	Jun 18, 2024
Grant date	Jun 18, 2024

Abstract

An instrumented trail-making task (iTMT) platform includes a wearable sensor and interactive interface technology configured to identify cognitive-cognitive impairment in individuals such as older adults. The iTMT platform may be programmed with neuropsychological tests for assessing individuals. The iTMT may provide information on visual search, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and/or executive functions as well as physical biomarkers of motor performance including slowness, weakness, exclusion, and/or motor planning error. Results of tests administered by the iTMT system may be reported to a patient or caregiver and used in identifying cogni-tive-motor impairment among individuals suffering from cognitive impairment, dementia, and/or those with frailty status, and/or cognitive frailty, and/or high risk of falling, and/or high likelihood of decline in cognitive-motor over time.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A method, comprising:
presenting, by a processor on a display, a series of requested motions to be performed by an individual;
receiving, by the processor, first motion data from a sensor worn by the individual, the first motion data recording movement of a body-joint of the individual performing a first instance of the series of requested motions while the individual is in a first posture, wherein the movement of the body-joint moves a cursor presented on the display while a sight-line between the sensor and the display is obstructed;
receiving, by the processor, second motion data from the sensor, the second motion data recording movement of the body-joint of the individual performing a second instance of the series of requested motions while the individual is in a second posture different than the first posture;
analyzing, by the processor, the first and second motion data to determine an impairment score for the individual indicative of an interaction between cognitive impairment and motor performance of the individual, wherein analyzing the first and second motion data comprises:
determining a first value of a parameter associated with a velocity of the cursor during the first instance of the series of requested motions, wherein determining the first value includes determining a first frequency component of a first signal corresponding to the velocity of the cursor during the first instance, determining a second frequency component of the first signal, and determining the first value as a ratio between the first and second frequency components of the first signal, wherein a frequency corresponding to the first frequency component is greater than a frequency corresponding to the second frequency component, and
determining a second value of the parameter associated with a velocity of the cursor during the second instance of the series of requested motions, wherein determining the second value includes determining a first frequency component of a second signal corresponding to the velocity of the cursor during the second instance, determining a second frequency component of the second signal, and determining the second value as a ratio between the first and second frequency components of the second signal;

determining, by the processor, the impairment score based on a comparison between the first and second values of the parameter, wherein the parameter is a jerkiness of the movement of the body-joint; and
reporting, by the processor, the impairment score for the individual.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of presenting the series of requested motions comprises presenting a series of sequentially-ordered numbers in a fixed order on a display.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of presenting the series of requested motions comprises presenting a series of sequentially-ordered numbers in a random order on a display.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of presenting the series of requested motions comprises presenting a series of sequentially-ordered numbers and letters in a random order on a display.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of presenting the series of requested motions comprises presenting a series of objects on a display.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of analyzing the first and second motion data comprises determining a total time used by the individual to complete the series of requested motions in each of the first and second instances, and wherein the impairment score is determined based on a comparison between the total time used in the first instance and the second instance.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of analyzing the received motion data comprises:
comparing a number of mistakes in performing the first instance of requested motions and the second instance of requested motions to determine a working memory performance; and
comparing a time elapsed between onset of movement and onset of display of virtual targets on the screen in performing the first instance of requested motions and the second instance of requested motions to estimate the ability of visual search, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and/or executive functions.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the series of requested motions is point-to-point reaching to assess motor performance or frailty.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameter associated with the velocity of the cursor is a dislocation of the maximum peak velocity of the cursor with respect to a middle pathway of a point-to-point reaching task to assess cognitive impairment, motor impairment, or fatigue.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the jerkiness of the movement of the body-joint is associated with weakness and motor performance of the individual.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of reporting the cognitive-motor impairment score comprises determining whether an individual exhibits signs of cognitive impairment, motor impairment, physical frailty, cognitive frailty, or a combination thereof.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the first and second instances of the series of requested motions to be performed by the individual comprises requests for performing body movements, comprising a point-to-point reaching movement, that translates a motion of a body joint into an interactive interface, wherein the parameter is a jerkiness of the point-to-point reaching movement;
wherein determining the impairment score is further based on a comparison between first and second values of a second parameter and a comparison between first and second values of a third parameter, wherein the first values of each of the second and third parameters are associated with the first instance of the series of requested motions and the second values of each of the second and third parameters are associated with the second instance of the series of requested motions, wherein:
the second parameter includes a speed of a point-to-point reaching movement;
the third parameter includes a time to complete the series of requested motions; and

analyzing the received motion data to determine the impairment score for the individual comprises determining a separate cognitive performance score and motor performance score for the individual based on the comparison between the first and second values of the parameter, the comparison between the first and second values of the second parameter, and the comparison between the first and second values of the third parameter.

13. A computer program product comprising:
a non-transitory computer readable medium comprising code, which when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform operations for performing steps comprising:
presenting a series of requested motions to be performed by an individual;
receiving first motion data from a sensor worn by the individual, the first motion data recording movement of a body-joint of the individual performing a first instance of the series of requested motions while the individual is in a first posture, wherein the movement of the body-joint moves a cursor presented on the display while a sight-line between the sensor and the display is obstructed;
receiving second motion data from the sensor, the second motion data recording movement of the body-joint of the individual performing a second instance of the series of requested motions while the individual is in a second posture different than the first posture;
analyzing the first and second motion data to determine an impairment score for the individual indicative of an interaction between cognitive impairment and motor performance of the individual, wherein analyzing the fir

Assignees

• Baylor College Medicine
• Us Veterans Affairs
• Arizona Broad Of Regents On Behalf Of Arizona State Univ
• Univ Arizona State

Inventors

• Najafi Bijan
• Razjouyan Javad
• Zhou He
• Kunik Mark

Classifications

• A61B2562/0219

  Inertial sensors, e.g. accelerometers, gyroscopes, tilt switches · CPC title

• A61B5/6829

  Foot or ankle · CPC title

• A61B5/1124

  Determining motor skills · CPC title

• G16H50/30 Primary

  for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment · CPC title

• A61B5/1121

  Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement · CPC title