Systems and methods for blockchain rule synchronization
US-2018039667-A1 · Feb 8, 2018 · US
US12010138B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12010138-B2 |
| Application number | US-202217972436-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 24, 2022 |
| Priority date | Apr 18, 2017 |
| Publication date | Jun 11, 2024 |
| Grant date | Jun 11, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
There may be provided a computer-implemented method. The computer-implemented method includes: i) broadcasting a transaction, by a node in a blockchain network, to a congress pool to join a congress formed of a group of nodes; ii) after the congress has accepted a request from a requester to activate a script, preparing, by the node, a blockchain transaction cryptographically locked with a public key associated with the congress; iii) cooperatively generating, by the node in cooperating with other nodes of the group, a valid cryptographic signature for the transaction to spend the transaction; iv) after the blockchain transaction has been unlocked, receiving data from the plurality of information providing systems; v) determining a centre point for the data received from the plurality of information providing systems; and vi) activating, by the node in cooperation with other nodes of the congress, the script based on the centre point.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: broadcasting a transaction, by a node in a blockchain network, to a congress pool to join a congress formed of a group of nodes; after the congress has accepted a request from a requester to activate a script, preparing, by the node, a blockchain transaction cryptographically locked with a public key associated with the congress pool, the blockchain transaction configured to permit a plurality of information providing systems to add inputs to the blockchain transaction, wherein the inputs include respective proof of solution data; generating, after the inputs have been added to the blockchain transaction, by the node in cooperation with other nodes of the group, a valid-cryptographic signature for the blockchain transaction to unlock the blockchain transaction, the cryptographic signature generated by the node cooperating with the other nodes of the congress using a plurality of private key shares, wherein each private key share of the plurality of private key shares is generated within a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) of an individual node of the congress; after the transaction has been unlocked, receiving data from the plurality of information providing systems; determining, by the node, whether the data received from at least one of the information providing systems corresponds with a committed solution based on the respective proof of solution data; wherein in response to determining that the data received from the at least one of the information providing systems does correspond with a committed solution based on the respective proof of solution data, the method further comprises: determining a centre point for the data received from the plurality of information providing systems; and activating, by the node in cooperation with the other nodes of the congress, the script based on the centre point; discarding, in response to determining that the data received from the at least one of the information providing systems does not correspond with a committed solution based on the respective proof of solution data, the data; detecting a corrupted node within one of the plurality of nodes of the congress; and setting a valid cryptographic signature to require greater than or equal to half of the plurality of private key shares when a corrupted node has been detected. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: based on the centre point, identifying, by the node, a subset of the information providing systems that provided data proximate to the centre point; and authorizing, by the node in cooperation with the other nodes of the group, a transfer of a token to each information providing system in the subset. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the token included in the transfer includes one or more tokens received from the requester into the congress pool. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the request includes a threshold indicator and wherein the subset is identified based on the threshold indicator. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the threshold indicator is received from the requester. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the inputs include tokens to be locked for security. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the information providing systems include, in the blockchain transaction, a hash based on a public key, a solution to the request and salt. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the data received from the plurality of information providing systems includes the public key, the solution to the request and the salt, the method further comprising: generating the hash based on the public key, the solution to the request and the salt; and comparing the generated hash with the hash included in the blockchain transaction. 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: detecting malicious activity by a malicious party, wherein the malicious party is one of the nodes of the congress; and using a private key share to confiscate at least a portion of tokens previously transferred to the congress pool by the malicious party. 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein confiscating comprises transferring to an unspendable account. 11. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed, configure a processor to perform the method of claim 1 . 12. An electronic device comprising: an interface device; a processor coupled to the interface device, the processor comprising a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE); and a memory coupled to the processor, the memory having stored thereon computer executable instructions that, when executed, configure the processor to perform the method of claim 1 , wherein the step of generating the private key share associated with the electronic device is performed within the TEE. 13. The electronic device of claim 12 , wherein the computer executable instructions are executed within the trusted execution environment.
Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection · CPC title
received data contents, e.g. message integrity · CPC title
involving non-keyed hash functions, e.g. modification detection codes [MDCs], MD5, SHA or RIPEMD · CPC title
using group based signatures, e.g. ring or threshold signatures · CPC title
using hash chains, e.g. blockchains or hash trees · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.