Method and apparatus for sharing spectrum between 3gpp lte and nr in wireless communication system
US-2019357264-A1 · Nov 21, 2019 · US
US12003971B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12003971-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117491298-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 30, 2021 |
| Priority date | Sep 30, 2020 |
| Publication date | Jun 4, 2024 |
| Grant date | Jun 4, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present application provides a method for sharing spectrum resource, device, electronic device and storage medium, which belong to the technical field of wireless communication and artificial intelligence. The method includes predicting traffic data amount of the at least two radio access technology (RAT) systems in a set first sharing period according to history traffic data of the at least two RAT systems and allocating spectrum resources in the first sharing period to the at least two RAT systems respectively according to the predicted traffic data amount. Based on the solutions provided by embodiments according to the present application, the utilization rate of spectrum resources can be effectively increased, and the user's traffic perception can be improved.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method performed by an electronic device for sharing spectrum resources, comprising: obtaining at least one time-variant feature and at least one time-invariant feature from history traffic data of at least two radio access technology (RAT) systems; obtaining a predicted traffic data amount of the at least two RAT systems in a sharing period based on a prediction result of the at least one time-variant feature using an artificial intelligence (AI) model and the at least one time-invariant feature; and performing a resource allocation for the at least two RAT systems in the sharing period based on the predicted traffic data amount of the at least two RAT systems, wherein the predicted traffic data amount comprises a first predicted data amount of a first RAT system of the at least two RAT systems in the sharing period and a second predicted data amount of a second RAT system of the at least two RAT systems in the sharing period, and wherein the predicted traffic data amount of the at least two RAT systems is obtained based on a principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the performing of the resource allocation comprises: determining at least one candidate transmission data amount in the sharing period according to the predicted traffic data amount of the at least two RAT systems; determining a target candidate transmission data amount according to the at least one candidate transmission data amount; and allocating spectrum resources according to the target candidate transmission data amount. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the determining of the target candidate transmission data amount, comprises: determining a legacy data amount corresponding to each candidate transmission data amount combination in the sharing period, wherein each candidate transmission data amount combination includes one candidate transmission data amount corresponding to each traffic data category; and determining, according to the legacy data amount corresponding to each candidate transmission data amount combination, the target candidate transmission data amount. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the determining of the legacy data amount corresponding to each candidate transmission data amount combination in the sharing period, comprises: for a candidate transmission data amount combination, determining a difference between the predicted traffic data amount and the candidate transmission data amount combination. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the determining of the target candidate transmission data amount comprises: determining, based on the candidate transmission data amount combination corresponding to a minimum legacy data amount, as the target candidate transmission data amount. 6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the determining of the at least one candidate transmission data amount in the sharing period comprises: determining at least one of: a number of resources corresponding to a total transmission data amount of each traffic data category in the sharing period being less than a first threshold, or a transmission delay of a legacy data amount in a previous sharing period being less than a second threshold. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the obtaining of the predicted traffic data amount of the at least two RAT systems in the sharing period comprises: determining a new traffic data amount of the at least two RAT systems in the sharing period based on the prediction result and the at least one time-invariant feature; determining a legacy data amount of a previous sharing period; and determining the first predicted data amount and the second predicted data amount in the sharing period according to the new traffic data amount of the at least two RAT systems in the sharing period and the legacy data amount of the previous sharing period. 8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising: obtaining the history traffic data corresponding to each traffic data category from the history traffic data of the at least two RAT systems; determining a new traffic data amount of each traffic data category in the sharing period according to the history traffic data corresponding to each traffic data category; and determining the new traffic data amount in the sharing period according to the new traffic data amount of each traffic data category in the sharing period. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the determining of the new traffic data amount in the sharing period comprises: determining a sum of the new traffic data amount of each traffic data category in the sharing period as the new traffic data amount of the sharing period. 10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the determining of the new traffic data amount of each traffic data category, comprises: predicting time-varying traffic data features of each traffic data category in the sharing period according to the history traffic data corresponding to each traffic data category; and determining the new traffic data amount of each traffic data category in the sharing period according to the time-varying traffic data features of each traffic data category in the sharing period. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the predicting of the time-varying traffic data features of each traffic data category comprises: determining history time-varying traffic data features and history time-invariant traffic data features of each traffic data category according to the history traffic data corresponding to each traffic data category; and predicting the time-varying traffic data features of each traffic data category in the sharing period according to the history time-varying traffic data features of each traffic data category, wherein, determining the new traffic data amount of each traffic data category in the sharing period according to the time-varying traffic data features of each traffic data category in the sharing period, comprises determining the new traffic data amount of each traffic data category in the sharing period according to the history time-invariant traffic data features of each traffic data category and the time-varying traffic data features of each traffic data category in the sharing period. 12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving, from a second base station using the second RAT system, resource information and history traffic data of the second RAT system among the history traffic data of the at least two RAT system, wherein the electronic device comprises a first base station using the first RAT system. 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicted traffic data amount is classified a user category, a traffic type category, and a RAT system category. 14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the history traffic data comprises at least one of: a user identifier corresponding to traffic data; a quality of service class (QoS) identifier corresponding to traffic data; a logical channel group identifier corresponding to traffic data; a traffic data amount to be transmitted in at least one history sharing period; and an actually transmitted traffic data amount of at least one history sharing period. 15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least two RAT systems comprise a fourth-generation mobile communication system (4G) and a fifth-generation mobile communication system (5G). 16. An electronic device, comprising: a processor; and a memory, comprising instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the electronic device to: obtain at least one time-variant feature and at least one time-invariant feature from history traffi
Traffic adaptive resource partitioning · CPC title
Spectrum sharing arrangements {between different networks} · CPC title
Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service] · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.