Method and device of communication in a communication system using an open radio access network
US-2023014932-A1 · Jan 19, 2023 · US
US12003286B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-12003286-B2 |
| Application number | US-202017425427-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 10, 2020 |
| Priority date | Apr 12, 2019 |
| Publication date | Jun 4, 2024 |
| Grant date | Jun 4, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method, system and apparatus are disclosed. According to one aspect, a network node configured to communicate with a wireless device (WD), includes processing circuitry configured to perform downlink wireless network virtualization by minimizing an expected deviation of received signals at WDs subject to network node power constraints.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A network node configured to communicate with a wireless device, WD, the network node comprising processing circuitry configured to: perform downlink wireless network virtualization by minimizing an expected deviation of received signals at WDs subject to power constraints on the network node. 2. The network node of claim 1 , wherein the expected deviation is between a service provider's virtual precoding and an infrastructure provider's actual precoding. 3. The network node of claim 2 , wherein each service provider independently determines a virtual precoding matrix of the service provider. 4. The network node of claim 2 , wherein a virtual precoding matrix determined by a service provider is associated with a pre-determined downlink power. 5. The network node of claim 2 , wherein the downlink wireless network virtualization is bounded when all service providers' determinations of virtual precoding matrices include match filtering or zero forcing. 6. The network node of claim 1 , wherein the minimizing is based at least in part on interference between service providers. 7. The network node of claim 1 , wherein the minimizing includes applying a drift-plus-penalty technique for stochastic network optimization based on inaccurate channel state information. 8. The network node of claim 1 , wherein the power constraints include at least one short term power constraint and at least one long term power constraint. 9. The network node of claim 1 , wherein the minimizing is performed without knowledge of channel distribution information. 10. The network node of claim 1 , wherein the minimizing occurs within a O ( 1 ϵ 2 ) convergence time to reach an ∈-approximate solution, where ∈ is a controllable constant. 11. A method in a network node configured to communicate with a wireless device, WD, the method comprising: performing downlink wireless network virtualization by minimizing an expected deviation of received signals at WDs subject to power constraints on the network node. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the expected deviation is between a service provider's virtual precoding and an infrastructure provider's actual precoding. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein each service provider independently determines a virtual precoding matrix of the service provider. 14. The method of claim 12 , wherein a virtual precoding matrix determined by a service provider is associated with a pre-determined downlink power. 15. The method of claim 12 , wherein the downlink wireless network virtualization is bounded when all service providers' determinations of virtual precoding matrices include match filtering or zero forcing. 16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the minimizing is based at least in part on interference between service providers. 17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the minimizing includes applying a drift-plus-penalty technique for stochastic network optimization based on inaccurate channel state information. 18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the power constraints include at least one short term power constraint and at least one long term power constraint. 19. The method of claim 11 , wherein the minimizing is performed without knowledge of channel distribution information. 20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the minimizing occurs within an O ( 1 ϵ 2 ) convergence time to reach an ∈-approximate solution, where ∈ is a controllable constant.
Power distribution · CPC title
Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting · CPC title
Channel coefficients, e.g. channel state information [CSI] · CPC title
Arrangements for optimising operational condition · CPC title
using the level of interference · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.