Signal processing device and video display device comprising same
US-2023044956-A1 · Feb 9, 2023 · US
US11972548B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11972548-B2 |
| Application number | US-202017438734-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 3, 2020 |
| Priority date | Dec 3, 2020 |
| Publication date | Apr 30, 2024 |
| Grant date | Apr 30, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented method for defect analysis is provided. The computer-implemented method includes obtaining a plurality of sets of defect point coordinates, a respective set of the plurality of sets of detect point coordinates including coordinates of defect points in a respective substrate of a plurality of substrates, the coordinates of defect points in the respective substrate being coordinates in an image coordinate system; combining the plurality of sets of defect point coordinates according to the image coordinate system into a composite set of coordinates to generate a composite image; and performing a clustering analysis to classify defect points in the composite set in the composite image into a plurality of clusters.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for defect analysis, comprising: obtaining a plurality of sets of defect point coordinates, a respective set of the plurality of sets of defect point coordinates comprising coordinates of defect points in a respective substrate of a plurality of substrates, the coordinates of defect points in the respective substrate being coordinates in an image coordinate system; combining the plurality of sets of defect point coordinates according to the image coordinate system into a composite set of coordinates to generate a composite image; performing a clustering analysis to classify defect points in the composite set in the composite image into a plurality of clusters determining a plurality of contours respectively of at least a plurality of selected clusters of the plurality of clusters, a respective one of the plurality of contours comprising a plurality of edge defect points in a respective one of the plurality of selected clusters; applying a fitting algorithm to edge defect points of the plurality of selected clusters to generate a plurality of mask areas respectively corresponding to the plurality of selected clusters; and generating a plurality of feature vectors respectively of the plurality of mask areas. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising obtaining a plurality of selected clusters from the plurality of clusters; wherein a number of defect points in each of the plurality of selected clusters is greater than a threshold number. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein generating the plurality of feature vectors comprises: generating Hu geometric moment m i,j and center-to-center distance M i,j of a respective one of the plurality of mask areas, wherein m i,j =Σ (x,y)∈A x i y j ; calculating defect point density p, area a, center of mass O (O x , O y ), and direction θ of the respective one of the plurality of mask areas; and generating a respective one of the plurality of feature vectors for the respective one of the plurality of mask areas. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein a respective one of the plurality of feature vectors is expressed as: F=[ρ,a,Ox,Oy,θ,L,W,r] T ; wherein ρ = N a , N stands tor a number of defect points in the respective one of the plurality of mask areas, a stands for an area of the respective one of the plurality of mask areas; O x = m 10 a ; O y = m 01 a ; θ = - 0.5 atc tan ( 2 M 11 M 02 - M 20 ) ; M ij = ∑ ( x , y ) ∈ 𝒜 ( x - O x ) i ( y - O y ) j ; r = L W ;; L stands for a length of a minimal external rectangle of the respective one of the plurality of mask areas; and W stands for a width of a minimal external rectangle of the respective one of the plurality of mask areas. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of contours are determined using an alpha shapes-based method. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: assigning one or more selected mask areas of the plurality of mask areas as a plurality of defect aggregation areas; wherein feature vectors respectively of the one or more selected mask areas satisfy a threshold condition. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising: comparing parameters of first defect points inside the one or more selected mask a
Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection · CPC title
Depth or shape recovery · CPC title
Hierarchical techniques, i.e. dividing or merging patterns to obtain a tree-like representation; Dendograms · CPC title
Fusion, i.e. combining data from various sources at the sensor level, preprocessing level, feature extraction level or classification level (multimodal speaker identification or verification G10L17/10) · CPC title
Industrial image inspection · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.