Systems and methods for improving the ranking and prioritization of attack-related events
US-10749890-B1 · Aug 18, 2020 · US
US11947679B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11947679-B2 |
| Application number | US-202318303317-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 19, 2023 |
| Priority date | Apr 29, 2020 |
| Publication date | Apr 2, 2024 |
| Grant date | Apr 2, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for managing vulnerability data may include: (1) ingesting, by a data ingestion engine, vulnerability data from a plurality of sources; (2) normalizing, by a data normalizer module, the vulnerability data into a plurality of data records; (3) generating, by a data processing module, a dynamic risk score for each data record; (4) storing, by a risk record register, a risk record for each data record, wherein the risk record may include the dynamic risk score, a priority level, an identifier for a software application, and a software dependency; (5) selecting, by a control policy selection engine, a control policy based on one of the dynamic risk scores; (6) implementing, by the risk record register, the selected control policy; (7) monitoring, by the risk record register, implementation of the control policy; and (8) updating, by the risk record register, the control policy selection engine based on the monitoring.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for managing vulnerability data, comprising: ingesting, by a data ingestion engine, vulnerability data from a plurality of sources; normalizing, by a data normalizer module, the vulnerability data into a plurality of data records, each data record having a predefined format and a plurality of pre-defined fields; de-duplicating, by a data processing module, the data records; generating, by the data processing module, a dynamic risk score for each de-duplicated data record, wherein the dynamic risk score is based on one or more rules; storing, by a risk record register, a risk record for each data de-duplicated record, wherein the risk record comprises the dynamic risk score, a priority level, an identifier for a software application, and a software dependency; selecting, by a control policy selection engine, a control policy based on one of the dynamic risk scores; implementing, by the risk record register, the selected control policy; monitoring, by the risk record register, implementation of the control policy; and updating, by the risk record register, the control policy selection engine based on the monitoring. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data ingestion engine, the data normalizer module, and the data processing module are triggered based on a state of the vulnerability record. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data ingestion engine receives the vulnerability data as a data stream. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data ingestion engine retrieves the vulnerability data from a plurality of data sources. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: enriching the data record with data identifying a software environment. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the dynamic risk score is further based on an asset sensitivity for an asset associated with a vulnerability associated with the de-duplicated data record, wherein the asset sensitivity is based on a confidentiality impact on the asset, an integrity impact on the asset, and an availability impact on the asset. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating a graphical output of a vulnerability across a plurality of systems; and displaying, on a display, the graphical output. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the control policy is implemented at an enforcement point or a tollgate. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the control policy comprises a safeguard or countermeasure to minimize security risks. 10. A system for managing vulnerability data, comprising: a data ingestion engine configured to ingest vulnerability data from a plurality of sources; a data normalizer module configured to normalize the vulnerability data into a plurality of data records, each data record having a predefined format and a plurality of pre-defined fields; a data processing module configured to de-duplicate the data records and to generate a dynamic risk score for each de-duplicated data record, wherein the dynamic risk score is based on one or more rules; a risk record register configured to store a risk record for each de-duplicated data record, wherein the risk record comprises the dynamic risk score, a priority level, an identifier for a software application, and a software dependency; and a control policy selection engine configured to select a control policy based on one of the dynamic risk scores, wherein the risk record register is configured to implement the selected control policy, monitor implementation of the control policy, and update the control policy selection engine based on the monitoring. 11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the data ingestion engine, the data normalizer module, and the data processing module are triggered based on a state of the vulnerability record. 12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the data ingestion engine is configured to receive the vulnerability data as a data stream. 13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the data ingestion engine is configured to receive the vulnerability data from a plurality of data sources. 14. The system of claim 10 , wherein the data processing module is further configured to enrich the data record with data identifying a software environment. 15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the dynamic risk score is further based on an asset sensitivity for an asset associated with a vulnerability associated with the data de-duplicated, wherein the asset sensitivity is based on a confidentiality impact on the asset, an integrity impact on the asset, and an availability impact on the asset. 16. The system of claim 10 , further comprising: a dashboard engine configured to generate a graphical output of a vulnerability across a plurality of systems and display the graphical output. 17. The system of claim 10 , wherein the control policy is implemented at an enforcement point or a tollgate. 18. The system of claim 10 , wherein the control policy comprises a safeguard or countermeasure to minimize security risks.
Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security · CPC title
Improving data quality; Data cleansing, e.g. de-duplication, removing invalid entries or correcting typographical errors · CPC title
Tools and structures for managing or administering access control systems · CPC title
Vulnerability analysis · CPC title
for managing network security; network security policies in general (filtering policies H04L63/0227) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.