Gap measurement for vehicle convoying
US-2023135207-A1 · May 4, 2023 · US
US11926322B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11926322-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117398666-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 10, 2021 |
| Priority date | Aug 10, 2021 |
| Publication date | Mar 12, 2024 |
| Grant date | Mar 12, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A hybrid deterministic override to cloud based probabilistic advanced driver assistance systems. Under default driving conditions, an ego vehicle is controlled by a probabilistic controller in a cloud. An overall gap between the ego vehicle and a leading vehicle is divided into an emergency collision gap and a driver specified gap. The vehicle sensors monitor the overall gap. When the gap between the ego vehicle and the leading vehicle is less than or equal to the emergency collision gap, a deterministic controller of the ego vehicle overrides the cloud based probabilistic controller to control the braking and acceleration of the ego vehicle.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for controlling an ego vehicle equipped with advanced driver assistance, comprising: receiving an input of a personalized gap of the ego vehicle; determining an emergency collision gap between the ego vehicle and a leading vehicle; when the personalized gap is greater than the emergency collision gap, controlling the ego vehicle by a cloud based probabilistic controller; and when the emergency collision gap is greater than or equal to the personalized gap, overriding the cloud based probabilistic controller and controlling the ego vehicle by a deterministic controller of the ego vehicle. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining an overall gap from a series of radar and LIDAR measurements made by the ego vehicle; determining a position of the ego vehicle; calculating, using at least two successive measurements of the series of radar and LIDAR measurements, a velocity of the leading vehicle and determining, by a deterministic controller of the ego vehicle, the emergency collision gap from the overall gap, a velocity of the ego vehicle, and the velocity of the leading vehicle; and transmitting the personalized gap, the overall gap, the emergency collision gap, the velocity of the leading vehicle, the velocity of the ego vehicle, and the position of the ego vehicle to the cloud based probabilistic controller. 3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising: correlating by the probabilistic controller, the personalized gap, the overall gap, the emergency collision gap, the velocity of the leading vehicle, the velocity of the ego vehicle, the position of the ego vehicle, and a position of the leading vehicle with a driver profile and historic driving habits of a driver of the ego vehicle; generating, by the cloud based probabilistic controller, a desired acceleration based on the correlating; transmitting, by a cloud-vehicle management communication device of the cloud based probabilistic controller, the desired acceleration to the deterministic controller; calculating, by an upper level controller of the deterministic controller, a first set of braking control signals and a second set of acceleration control signals based on the desired acceleration; when the personalized gap is greater than the emergency collision gap, the deterministic controller actuating one or more of: a hydraulic braking system using the first set of braking control signals, and an acceleration system using the second set of acceleration control signals; and when the emergency collision gap is greater than or equal to the personalized gap overriding the cloud based probabilistic controller by invoking an override function. 4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising: generating, by the upper level controller, an acceleration command based on the desired acceleration; transmitting, by the upper level controller, the acceleration command to a longitudinal dynamics controller including a mode switch, an acceleration processor, and a deceleration processor; receiving, by the longitudinal dynamics controller, a set of feedback signals from the hydraulic braking system and the acceleration system; calculating an updated emergency collision gap from a new series of radar and LIDAR measurements made by the ego vehicle; determining, by the longitudinal dynamics controller, whether to continue to invoke, by the mode switch, the override function based on the updated emergency collision gap; continuing to override the cloud based probabilistic controller when the override function is invoked: and returning control to the cloud based probabilistic controller when the override function is not invoked. 5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising: when overriding the cloud based probabilistic controller, determining, by the upper level controller, a desired longitudinal force needed to control the ego vehicle; transmitting the desired longitudinal force to a lower level controller with the first set of braking control signals, the second set of acceleration control signals, the velocity of the ego vehicle and the overall gap; outputting, by the lower level controller, the velocity of the ego vehicle, the overall gap and the first set of braking control signals to the hydraulic braking system; and outputting, by the lower level controller, the velocity of the ego vehicle, the overall gap and the second set of acceleration control signals to the acceleration system. 6. The method of claim 2 , further comprising: receiving, by the cloud based probabilistic controller, the personalized gap and the overall gap from the ego vehicle; retrieving, from a memory of the cloud based probabilistic controller, a stored historical driving data of a driver of the ego vehicle; applying the personalized gap, the overall gap, the emergency collision gap, the velocity of the leading vehicle and the velocity of the ego vehicle to a machine learning algorithm and generating a personalized acceleration profile based on the personalized gap, the historical driving data, the overall gap, the emergency collision gap, the velocity of the leading vehicle, the position of the ego vehicle, and the velocity of the ego vehicle; determining, by a personalized adaptive cruise control algorithm a desired acceleration for the ego vehicle based on the personalized acceleration profile and the overall gap, the emergency collision gap, the velocity of the leading vehicle, and the velocity of the ego vehicle; generating the desired acceleration; and transmitting the desired acceleration to the deterministic controller. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the machine learning algorithm is a Gaussian process algorithm. 8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the machine learning algorithm is a Bayesian inference algorithm. 9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: overriding, by the deterministic controller, the cloud based probabilistic controller when one or more conditions exist, the one or more conditions including the overall gap is less than or equal to the emergency collision gap; the personalized gap is greater than or equal to the overall gap; and the emergency collision gap is greater than the personalized gap.
Speed limiting therefor · CPC title
Details of control systems ensuring comfort, safety or stability not otherwise provided for · CPC title
Automatic control mode change · CPC title
Operations & Transport · mapped topic
Longitudinal speed · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.