Crime risk forecasting
US-9129219-B1 · Sep 8, 2015 · US
US11907175B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11907175-B2 |
| Application number | US-202218051035-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 31, 2022 |
| Priority date | Mar 29, 2017 |
| Publication date | Feb 20, 2024 |
| Grant date | Feb 20, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A model management system provides a centralized repository for storing and accessing models. The model management system receives an input to store a model object in a first model state generated based on a first set of known variables. The model management system generates a first file including a first set of functions defining the first model state and associates the first file with a model key identifying the model object. The model management system receives an input to store the model object in a second model state having been generated based on the first model state and a second set of known variables. The model management system generates a second file including a second set of functions defining the second model state and associates the second file with the model key. The model management system identifies available versions of the model object based on the model key.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A model management system comprising: one or more computer processors; and one or more computer-readable mediums storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more computer processors, cause the model management system to perform operations comprising: receiving an input to access a model management interface; identifying a first model state and a second model state associated with a model key corresponding to a model object, the first model state having been generated based on a first set of known variables, and the second model state having been generated based on the model object in the first model state and a second set of known variables; and causing presentation, in the model management interface, of data identifying a set of available versions of the model object including the first model state and the second model state. 2. The model management system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising: receiving an input to store the model object in the first model state; generating a first file including a first set of functions defining the first model state; associating the first file with the model key identifying the model object; receiving an input to store the model object in the second model state; generating a second file including a second set of functions defining the second model state; and associating the second file with the model key identifying the model object. 3. The model management system of claim 2 , the operations further comprising: generating the first set of functions based on the first set of known variables, the first set of functions including a first parameter; and generating the second set of functions based on the first model state and the second set of known variables, the second set of functions including an updated first parameter that is different than the first parameter. 4. The model management system of claim 3 , the operations further comprising: receiving an input to evaluate performance of the model object; and generating a report based on the first set of functions and the second set of functions, the report indicating a change between the first parameter and the updated first parameter. 5. The model management system of claim 3 , the operations further comprising: generating a third set of functions based on the second model state and a third set of known variables, the third set of functions defining a third model state of the model object and including a second updated first parameter that is different than the updated first parameter. 6. The model management system of claim 5 , the operations further comprising: receiving an input to store the model object in the third model state; generating a third file including the third set of functions defining the third model state; and associating the third file with the model key identifying the model object. 7. The model management system of claim 2 , wherein the first file and the second file are both JavaScript Object Notation files. 8. A method comprising: receiving an input to access a model management interface; identifying a first model state and a second model state associated with a model key corresponding to a model object, the first model state having been generated based on a first set of known variables, and the second model state having been generated based on the model object in the first model state and a second set of known variables; and causing presentation, in the model management interface, of data identifying a set of available versions of the model object including the first model state and the second model state. 9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising: receiving an input to store the model object in the first model state; generating a first file including a first set of functions defining the first model state; associating the first file with the model key identifying the model object; receiving an input to store the model object in the second model state; generating a second file including a second set of functions defining the second model state; and associating the second file with the model key identifying the model object. 10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising: generating the first set of functions based on the first set of known variables, the first set of functions including a first parameter; and generating the second set of functions based on the first model state and the second set of known variables, the second set of functions including an updated first parameter that is different than the first parameter. 11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: receiving an input to evaluate performance of the model object; and generating a report based on the first set of functions and the second set of functions, the report indicating a change between the first parameter and the updated first parameter. 12. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: generating a third set of functions based on the second model state and a third set of known variables, the third set of functions defining a third model state of the model object and including a second updated first parameter that is different than the updated first parameter. 13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising: receiving an input to store the model object in the third model state; generating a third file including the third set of functions defining the third model state; and associating the third file with the model key identifying the model object. 14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the first file and the second file are both JavaScript Object Notation files. 15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by one or more computer processors of one or more computing devices, cause the one or more computing devices to perform operations comprising: receiving an input to access a model management interface; identifying a first model state and a second model state associated with a model key corresponding to a model object, the first model state having been generated based on a first set of known variables, and the second model state having been generated based on the model object in the first model state and a second set of known variables; and causing presentation, in the model management interface, of data identifying a set of available versions of the model object including the first model state and the second model state. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , the operations further comprising: receiving an input to store the model object in the first model state; generating a first file including a first set of functions defining the first model state; associating the first file with the model key identifying the model object; receiving an input to store the model object in the second model state; generating a second file including a second set of functions defining the second model state; and associating the second file with the model key identifying the model object. 17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , the operations further comprising: generating the first set of functions based on the first set of known variables, the first set of functions including a first parameter; and generating the second set of functions based on the first model state and the second set of known variables, the second set of functions including an updated first parameter that is different than the first parameter. 18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 , the op
Versioning file systems, temporal file systems, e.g. file system supporting different historic versions of files · CPC title
File access structures, e.g. distributed indices (arrangements of input from, or output to, record carriers G06F3/06) · CPC title
Specific adaptations of the file system to access devices and non-file objects via standard file system access operations, e.g. pseudo file systems (dedicated interfaces to storage systems G06F3/0601) · CPC title
Computer-aided design [CAD] · CPC title
Computing arrangements based on specific mathematical models · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.