Event condition detection
US-2017337485-A1 · Nov 23, 2017 · US
US11893876B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11893876-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117328615-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 24, 2021 |
| Priority date | Apr 3, 2017 |
| Publication date | Feb 6, 2024 |
| Grant date | Feb 6, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A building monitoring system includes a sensor configured to sense a condition and collect sensor data related to the sensed condition. The building monitoring system also includes a server configured to receive the sensor data. The server is configured to analyze the sensor data to detect an undesirable condition and a threat from the undesirable condition within a structure and automatically issue a notification upon detection of the undesirable condition and the threat.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising the steps of: receiving first data representing conditions at each of the plurality of sensors, the plurality of sensors comprising at least a first sensor and a second sensor; determining a plurality of averages using data from each sensor, each of the plurality of averages determined using data received over an interval of time; repeatedly combining the plurality of averages to obtain a plurality of combined averages for each sensor; determining a distribution of the plurality of combined averages for each sensor; using the distribution, determine an upper control limit and a lower control limit for each sensor; receiving second data from the plurality of sensors representing conditions at each of the plurality of sensors; comparing the received second data from a first sensor with the upper control limit and lower control limit for the first sensor and identify an undesirable condition if the second data falls outside of a range defined between the upper control limit for the first sensor and the lower control limit for the first sensor; determining a severity value of an undesirable condition at the first sensor by dividing the received second data from the first sensor representing the undesirable condition by the upper control limit for the first sensor; determining the cumulative severity of detected undesirable conditions by performing the steps of: combining the severity value of the undesirable condition at the first sensor with a severity value of an undesirable condition from at least one additional sensor into a mean severity value; applying a cumulative distribution function to the resulting mean severity values determined over a period of time; and applying a sensor location multiplier to a result of the cumulative distribution function; and triggering an alert as the result of the identified undesirable condition. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the distribution of the plurality of combined averages is determined from a standard deviation and the upper control limit is determined using a goodness of fit technique. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of determining the plurality of averages for each sensor is performed using a moving average calculation method. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of determining the plurality of averages for each sensor is performed using a weighted average calculation method. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining a probability of a damaging condition by determining the result of 1 - e ( - Severity - 1 Mean of [ Severity - 1 ] ) . 6. A system comprising: a plurality of sensors configured to monitor one or more ambient conditions; and a processing system coupled to the plurality of sensors, wherein the processing system comprises instructions which when executed by the processing system causes the processing system to: receive first data representing conditions at each of the plurality of sensors, the plurality of sensors comprising at least a first sensor and a second sensor; determine a plurality of averages using data from each sensor, each of the plurality of averages determined using data received over an interval of time; repeatedly combine the plurality of averages to obtain a plurality of combined averages for each sensor; determine a distribution of the plurality of combined averages for each sensor; using the distribution, determine an upper control limit and a lower control limit for each sensor; receive a second data from the plurality of sensors representing conditions at each of the plurality of sensors; compare the received second data from a first sensor with the upper control limit and lower control limit for the first sensor and identify an undesirable condition if the second data falls outside of a range defined between the upper control limit for the first sensor and the lower control limit for the first sensor; determine a severity value of an undesirable condition at the first sensor by dividing the received second data from the first sensor representing the undesirable condition by the upper control limit for the first sensor; and trigger an alert as the result of the undesirable condition. 7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the processing system determines the distribution of the plurality of combined averages from a standard deviation and the upper control limit is determined using a goodness of fit technique. 8. The system of claim 6 , wherein the step of determining the plurality of averages for each sensor is performed using a moving average calculation method. 9. The system of claim 6 , wherein the step of determining the plurality of averages for each sensor is performed using a weighted average calculation method. 10. The system of claim 6 , wherein the processing system further comprises instructions which when executed by the processing system causes the processing system to: determine the cumulative severity of detected undesirable conditions by performing the steps of: combine the severity value of the undesirable condition at the first sensor with a severity value of an undesirable condition from at least one additional sensor into a mean severity value; applying a cumulative distribution function to the mean severity values determined over a period of time; and applying a sensor location multiplier to a result of the cumulative distribution function. 11. The system of claim 6 , wherein the processing system comprises: a communication gateway in electronic communication with a least a portion of the plurality of sensors; and a server in communication with the communications gateway. 12. A real time severity notification system comprising: a plurality of sensors configured to monitor one or more ambient conditions; and a processing system coupled to the plurality of sensors, wherein the processing system comprises instructions which when executed by the processing system causes the processing system to: receive first data representing conditions at each of the plurality of sensors, the plurality of sensors comprising at least a first sensor and a second sensor; determine a plurality of averages using data from each sensor, each of the plurality of averages determined using data received over an interval of time; repeatedly combine the plurality of averages to obtain a plurality of combined averages for each sensor; determine a distribution of the plurality of combined averages for each sensor; determine an upper control limit and a lower control limit for each sensor from the distribution; receive second data from the plurality of sensors represe
using communication transmission lines {(G08B13/19658, G08B21/0286, G08B25/016 take precedence)} · CPC title
Graphical models, e.g. Bayesian networks · CPC title
Explanation of inference; Explainable artificial intelligence [XAI]; Interpretable artificial intelligence · CPC title
Probabilistic graphical models, e.g. probabilistic networks · CPC title
Electrical actuation · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.