Flitch tracking
US-2024391127-A1 · Nov 28, 2024 · US
US11892817B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11892817-B2 |
| Application number | US-202217878021-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2022 |
| Priority date | Oct 31, 2014 |
| Publication date | Feb 6, 2024 |
| Grant date | Feb 6, 2024 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method of enabling expedited manufacture of one or more instantiations of a structure modeled as a 3D computer model, the method implemented on one or more computer devices including displaying one or more user selectable expedited manufacturing reservation options for a plurality of requests for manufacture, generating a prompt to select a user selectable expedited manufacturing reservation option, receiving an expedited manufacturing, storing the expedited manufacturing reservation, receiving a request for manufacture of one or more instantiations of a structure modeled in an associated 3D computer model from a user, compare one or more of the requests for manufacture and one or more aspects of the associated 3D computer model with the expedited manufacturing reservation, determining an applicability of the expedited manufacturing reservation to the request for manufacture, calculating a total time to complete the request for manufacture, and presenting the total time to complete the request for manufacture.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system for matching a computer-aided design (CAD) model with at least one supplier, the system comprising: a computing device configured to: receive, from a user, a computer-aided design (CAD) file representative of a structure to be fabricated; receive, using a graphical user interface (GUI), a plurality of user inputted preferences for manufacture of the structure to be fabricated, wherein the plurality of user inputted preferences includes at least a lead time and at least a quantity to be manufactured; receive an attribute data associated with a plurality of suppliers; determine a plurality of manufacturing requirements associated with the CAD model, wherein determining the plurality of manufacturing requirements includes: causing an interrogator operating on the computer system to parse a software model of the structure to be manufactured, wherein parsing the software model comprises: identifying a discrete shape from the software model as a function of computer assisted design (CAD) commands associated with the software model; wherein identifying the discrete shape comprises calculating, from a plurality of points on the software model, a position of a point of the plurality of points in a three-dimensional space; determining a manufacturing requirement for the product to be manufactured as a function of the identified shape, wherein the manufacturing requirement comprises CAD data and user data, the manufacturing requirement further comprising a number of manufacturing process steps; and determining a second manufacturing requirement from the plurality of user-inputted preferences, wherein the second manufacturing requirement includes a pricing requirement; compare the attribute data to the first manufacturing requirement associated with the CAD model and the pricing requirement associated with the CAD model; determine a best supplier of the plurality of suppliers as a function of the comparison of the attribute data to the first manufacturing requirement and the comparison of the attribute data to the pricing requirement; and populate at least a portion of the GUI with information related to the selected supplier according to the user inputted preferences. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the GUI is further configured to: receive a first user input identifying at least a first user-inputted preference as required; and receive a second user input identifying at least a second user-inputted preference as not required. 3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the CAD file comprises a three-dimensional (3D) CAD model. 4. The system of claim 2 , wherein the computing device is configured to perform a geometric analysis of the CAD file, and the GUI is configured to generate at least a field for inputting a user preference as a function of the geometric analysis. 5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the attribute data comprises one or more capabilities of the at least a supplier. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the attribute data comprises pricing of the at least a supplier. 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the attribute data comprises the constraints of the at least a supplier. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computing device is further configured to: perform a geometric analysis of the CAD file; and determine a manufacturing process for fabricating the structure as a function of the geometric analysis. 9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computing device is further configured to determine the best match as a function of an analysis of geometry of the structure to be fabricated. 10. The system of claim 1 , wherein parsing the software model further comprises identifying at least a shape from the software model as a function of computer assisted design (CAD) commands associated with the software model. 11. A method of use for matching a computer-aided design (CAD) model with at least one supplier, the method comprising: receiving, at a computing device, a computer-aided design (CAD) file from a user, wherein the CAD file is representative of a structure to be fabricated; receiving, using a graphical user interface (GUI), a plurality of user inputted preferences for manufacture of the structure to be fabricated, wherein the plurality of user inputted preferences includes at least a lead time and at least a quantity to be manufactured; receiving, at the computing device, an attribute data associated with a plurality of suppliers; determining, at the computing device, a plurality of manufacturing requirements associated with the CAD model, wherein determining the plurality of manufacturing requirements includes: causing an interrogator operating on the computer system to parse a software model of the structure to be manufactured, wherein parsing the software model comprises: identifying a discrete shape from the software model as a function of computer assisted design (CAD) commands associated with the software model; wherein identifying the discrete shape comprises calculating, from a plurality of points on the software model, a position of a point of the plurality of points in a three-dimensional space; determining a manufacturing requirement for the product to be manufactured as a function of the identified shape, wherein the manufacturing requirement comprises CAD data and user data, the manufacturing requirement further comprising a number of manufacturing process steps; determining a second manufacturing requirement from the plurality of user-inputted preferences; comparing, at the computing device, the attribute data to the first manufacturing requirement associated with the CAD model and the pricing requirement associated with the CAD model; determining, at the computing device, a best supplier of the plurality of suppliers as a function of the comparison of the attribute data to the first manufacturing requirement and the comparison of the attribute data to the pricing requirement; and populating at least a portion of the GUI with information related to the selected supplier according to the user inputted preferences. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the GUI is further configured to: receive a first user input identifying at least a first user-inputted preference as required; and receive a second user input identifying at least a second user-inputted preference as not required. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the CAD file comprises a three-dimensional (3D) CAD model. 14. The method of claim 12 , further comprising performing a geometric analysis of the CAD file, and the GUI is configured to generate at least a field for inputting a user preference as a function of the geometric analysis. 15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the attribute data comprises one or more capabilities of the at least a supplier. 16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the attribute data comprises the pricing of the at least a supplier. 17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the attribute data comprises the constraints of the at least a supplier. 18. The method of claim 11 , further comprising: performing a geometric analysis of the CAD file; and determine a manufacturing process for fabricating the structure as a function of the geometric analysis. 19. The method of claim 11 , wherein the computing device is further configured to determine the best match as a function of an analysis of geometry of the structure to be fabricated. 20. The method of claim 11 , wherein parsing the software model further comprises identifying at least a shape from the
characterised by using design data to control NC machines, e.g. CAD/CAM (G05B19/4093 takes precedence) · CPC title
3-D cad-cam · CPC title
Manufacturing · CPC title
Resource planning in a project environment · CPC title
Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.