System for monitoring the operational status of an aircraft crew, and associated method

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-11857324-B2
Application number	US-202217676128-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Feb 19, 2022
Priority date	Feb 22, 2021
Publication date	Jan 2, 2024
Grant date	Jan 2, 2024

Abstract

A system for monitoring the operational status of an aircraft crew includes a unit for determining at least one pilot state based on first monitoring data of a high design assurance level and second monitoring data of a lower design assurance level. The determination unit includes a first evaluation module capable of obtaining a high-level pilot state from the first data, regardless of the second data; a second evaluation module capable of determining a low-level pilot state, from at least the second data; and a consolidation module for determining a consolidated pilot state. The consolidated pilot state is obtained as a function of the high-level pilot state and the low-level pilot state.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. An aircraft crew operational state monitoring system comprising:
a first interface configured to receive first crew monitoring data, the first crew monitoring data having a high design assurance level;
a second interface configured to receive second crew monitoring data, the second crew monitoring data having a lower design assurance level than the first crew monitoring data; and
a pilot state determiner configured to determine at least one monitored pilot state based on the high design assurance level first crew monitoring data received from the first receiving interface, and based on the lower design assurance level second crew monitoring data received from the second receiving interface,
for the at least one monitored pilot state, the pilot state determiner being configured to implement a first deterministic algorithm to obtain a high-level pilot state from the high design assurance level first crew monitoring data, regardless of the lower design assurance level second crew monitoring data;
the pilot state determiner being configured to determine a low-level pilot state, from at least the lower design assurance level second crew monitoring data;
the pilot state determiner being configured to determine a consolidated pilot state, the consolidated pilot state being obtained in an active configuration of the low-level pilot state determination as a function of the high-level pilot state and of the low-level pilot state, and is obtained in an inactive configuration of the low-level pilot state determination as a function of the high-level pilot state, without taking the low-level pilot state into account.

2. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the consolidated pilot state determined by the pilot state determiner is configured to change from a normal state to at least one degraded state, the high-level pilot state being configured to change from a normal high-level state to at least one degraded high-level state, the low-level pilot state being configured to change from a normal low-level state to a degraded low-level state, the pilot state determiner being configured to establish a degraded pilot state when a high-level degraded pilot state and/or when a low-level degraded pilot state are determined.

3. The system according to claim 1 , wherein pilot state determiner comprises a first finite-state machine implementing the first deterministic algorithm.

4. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the pilot state determiner is configured to implement a second deterministic algorithm to determine the low-level pilot state.

5. The system according to claim 4 , wherein the pilot state determiner comprises a second finite-state machine implementing the second deterministic algorithm.

6. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first receiving interface is configured to receive, together with each item of first crew monitoring data, a first validity level associated with the first crew monitoring data item, the second receiving interface being configured to receive, together with each item of second crew monitoring data, a second validity level associated with the second crew monitoring data item, the pilot state determiner being configured to take into account the first and second validity levels of the first crew monitoring data item and of the second crew monitoring data item in order to determine the high-level and low-level pilot states and/or to determine a pilot state validity level.

7. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the pilot state determiner is configured to obtain the low-level pilot state based on the lower design assurance level second crew monitoring data obtained from the second interface and on the high design assurance level first crew monitoring data obtained from the first interface.

8. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the pilot state determiner is configured to calculate a high level confidence level associated with the obtained high-level pilot state, the pilot state determiner being configured to calculate a low level confidence level associated with the obtained low-level pilot state, the pilot state determiner being configured to calculate a consolidated confidence level associated with the consolidated pilot state, based on the high-level confidence level and on the low-level confidence level.

9. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the consolidated pilot state is selected from a state of presence at an aircraft crew work station, a state of aircraft operation ability, a state of incapacitation and/or of sleep, a state of alertness, a state of drowsiness, distraction and/or inattention, a state of work overload, a state of mental overload, a state of stress, a state of present situation awareness, a state of task engagement, a state of physical activity level, and/or a state of pilot activity consistency and relevance with the mission.

10. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the pilot state determiner comprises a lower-level state determination deactivation command accessible to a crew member, the lower-level state determination deactivation command being operable to switch the pilot state determiner from the active configuration of the low-level pilot state determination to the inactive configuration of the low-level pilot state determination.

11. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first receiving interface and/or the second receiving interface is configured to receive first crew monitoring data and/or second crew monitoring data from an avionics system and/or from a crew member's interaction with a human/machine interface of the avionics system.

12. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first receiving interface and/or the second receiving interface is configured to receive first crew monitoring data and/or second crew monitoring data from at least one crew member state monitoring sensor.

13. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the at least one crew member state monitoring sensor comprise a crew member seat presence sensor, an optical detection sensor with a field of view facing a seat of the crew member, a camera operating in the visible, near-infrared, or thermal spectrum, and/or a 2D and/or 3D time-of-flight camera, and/or crew physiological parameters detecting sensor, an ECG sensor, a breathing detection sensor, an EEG sensor, an FNIR sensor, a connected watch, a connected bracelet or a connected garment.

14. The system according to claim 1 , further comprising a display and a display manager on the display, the display manager being configured to generate and display on the display a status monitoring window illustrative of the consolidated pilot state determined by the pilot state determiner.

15. The system according to claim 1 , further comprising an information generator, and/or an alarm generator configured to generate at least one item of information, and/or at least one alarm when the consolidated pilot state determined by the pilot state determiner is in a degraded state.

16. An aircraft crew operational state monitoring method, implemented in an aircraft crew operational state monitoring system, comprising:
receiving, via a first receiving interface of the monitoring system, first crew monitoring data, the first crew monitoring data having a high design assurance level;
receiving, via a second receiving interface of the monitoring system, second crew monitoring data having a lower design assurance level than the first crew monitoring data;
determining, via a pilot state determiner of the monitoring system, at least one pilot state based on the high design assurance level first crew monit

Assignees

• Dassault Aviat

Inventors

• Salmon-Legagneur François
• Ligier Valentin
• Saint Requier Cyril

Classifications

• A61B5/18 Primary

  for vehicle drivers {or machine operators} · CPC title

• A61B5/742

  using visual displays (displays for heart-related electrical signals, e.g. ECG, A61B5/339) · CPC title

• A61B5/746

  Alarms related to a physiological condition, e.g. details of setting alarm thresholds or avoiding false alarms · CPC title

• A61B5/7475

  User input or interface means, e.g. keyboard, pointing device, joystick · CPC title

• B64D45/0053 Primary

  using visual equipment, e.g. cameras · CPC title