Adjustments to superconducting electronic circuit designs using passive transmission line modeling
US-2024362385-A1 · Oct 31, 2024 · US
US11797738B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11797738-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117542039-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 3, 2021 |
| Priority date | Jul 25, 2019 |
| Publication date | Oct 24, 2023 |
| Grant date | Oct 24, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A design management apparatus ( 100 ) includes a conversion unit ( 12 ) and a test unit ( 13 ). The conversion unit ( 12 ) generates model information ( 403 ) that is a format of design information ( 303 ) being converted, the design information ( 303 ) being the design information ( 303 ) created in a process of mechanical design in an engineering chain, and generates model information ( 405 ) that is a format of design information ( 305 ) being converted, the design information ( 305 ) being the design information ( 305 ) created in a process of control design in the engineering chain. The test unit ( 13 ) associates the model information ( 403 ) and the model information ( 405 ) using entire reference information ( 22 ) that associates the model information ( 403 ) and the model information ( 405 ), and tests for consistency between the model information ( 403 ) and the model information ( 405 ) associated.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A test apparatus comprising: processing circuitry, wherein the processing circuitry converts formats of a plurality of pieces of design information, the plurality of pieces of design information being the design information created in each process of a plurality of processes in an engineering chain, to a format that can be compared between the pieces of design information, generates model information that indicates the design information, the format of which has been converted, for each piece of the design information, associates a plurality of pieces of model information using entire reference information, the entire reference information being information that associates the plurality of pieces of design information, and tests for consistency between the pieces of model information associated, wherein the processing circuitry further: converts, using a conversion rule for format conversion, the formats of the plurality of pieces of design information to a format that can be compared with one another, and generates each piece of model information in the plurality of pieces of model information from a corresponding one of the plurality of pieces of design information, by converting the format of the corresponding one of the plurality of pieces of design information according to the conversion rule. 2. The test apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry associates, with regard to the internal data that indicates data internally included in the model information, the pieces of internal data included internally in the model information with one another using internal reference information in which correspondence between the pieces of internal data is written, and tests whether or not first model information that indicates the model information in which the pieces of internal data are associated with one another and second model information that indicates the model information associated with the first model information using the entire reference information are consistent. 3. The test apparatus according to claim 2 , wherein the processing circuitry determines, at a time of testing consistency between one piece of model information having a plurality of elements and another piece of model information having a plurality of elements, whether or not the element that the one piece of model information has and the element that the another piece of model information has are consistent, and in a case where the processing circuitry determines that the element that the one piece of model information has and the element that the another piece of model information has are not consistent, outputs the element determined as not consistent. 4. The test apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry determines, at a time of testing consistency between one piece of model information having a plurality of elements and another piece of model information having a plurality of elements, whether or not the element that the one piece of model information has and the element that the another piece of model information has are consistent, and in a case where the processing circuitry determines that the element that the one piece of model information has and the element that the another piece of model information has are not consistent, outputs the element determined as not consistent. 5. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a test program causing a computer to execute: a conversion process to convert formats of a plurality of pieces of design information, the plurality of pieces of design information being the design information created in each process of a plurality of processes in an engineering chain, to a format that can be compared between the pieces of design information, and to generate model information that indicates the design information, the format of which has been converted, for each piece of the design information; and a test process to associate a plurality of pieces of model information using entire reference information, the entire reference information being information that associates the plurality of pieces of design information, and to test for consistency between the pieces of model information associated, wherein the conversion process further: converts, using a conversion rule for format conversion, the formats of the plurality of pieces of design information to a format that can be compared with one another, and generates each piece of model information in the plurality of pieces of model information from a corresponding one of the plurality of pieces of design information, by converting the format of the corresponding one of the plurality of pieces of design information according to the conversion rule. 6. A test method comprising: converting formats of a plurality of pieces of design information, the plurality of pieces of design information being the design information created in each process of a plurality of processes in an engineering chain, to a format that can be compared between the pieces of design information, generating model information that indicates the design information, the format of which has been converted, for each piece of the design information, and by associating a plurality of pieces of model information using entire reference information, the entire reference information being information that associates the plurality of pieces of design information, testing for consistency between the pieces of model information associated, wherein converting formats of the plurality of pieces of design information comprises using a conversion rule for format conversion to convert the formats of the plurality of pieces of design information to a format that can be compared with one another, and generating the model information comprises generating each piece of model information in the plurality of pieces of model information from a corresponding one of the plurality of pieces of design information, by converting the format of the corresponding one of the plurality of pieces of design information according to the conversion rule.
using simulation · CPC title
Geometric CAD · CPC title
Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title
Reliability analysis or reliability optimisation; Failure analysis, e.g. worst case scenario performance, failure mode and effects analysis [FMEA] · CPC title
Configuration CAD, e.g. designing by assembling or positioning modules selected from libraries of predesigned modules · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.