Real time parent child well interference control

US11753917B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-11753917-B2
Application numberUS-202017033428-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateSep 25, 2020
Priority dateSep 25, 2020
Publication dateSep 12, 2023
Grant dateSep 12, 2023

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

When a child well is hydraulically fractured near the depleted reservoir volume surrounding a previously produced parent well, it is economically efficient to deliver proppant to the formation volume and fractures not reached by the parent well. A fracture length, which is the distance fluid travels from the child well to the depleted region, is calculated as a function of fracture stage. From identified trends in fracture length, fracture length for future stages can be predicted. Based on predicted fracture length, the slurry or treatment volume to cause well interference can be estimated. Proppant concentration or fracturing stage design can be adjusted so that the well interference volume is larger than the treatment volume and proppant is efficiently delivered to the child well fractures.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method comprising: determining an interference time for a first hydraulic fracturing stage of a child well based, at least in part, on a measured pressure response in a parent well; determining an interference volume for the first hydraulic fracturing stage of the child well based, at least in part, on the interference time; and determining a first fracture length between the child well and a depleted reservoir region of the parent well for the first hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the interference volume; and estimating a distance to a depleted reservoir boundary of the depleted reservoir region based, at least in part, on the first fracture length. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the interference volume further comprises: determining the interference volume based, at least in part, on an integral of a treatment rate in the child well over the interference time. 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: determining a flow-distribution factor for the first hydraulic fracturing stage, wherein the flow-distribution factor is a measure of a uniformity of a fluid transport through the first fracture length. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the flow-distribution factor comprises determining the flow-distribution factor based on a poro-elastic model. 5. The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the flow-distribution factor comprises determining the flow-distribution factor based on a planar model. 6. The method of claim 3 , wherein determining the first fracture length comprises determining the first fracture length based on the flow-distribution factor. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: predicting a second fracture length for a second hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the first fracture length. 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the second hydraulic fracturing stage comprises at least one of a hydraulic fracturing stage in the child well or a hydraulic fracturing stage in a second well. 9. The method of claim 7 , wherein predicting the second fracture length comprises determining a trend within one or more fracture lengths. 10. The method of claim 7 , further comprising: predicting a volume-to-frac-hit based on the second fracture length. 11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: calculating a proppant ramp schedule based on the predicted volume-to-frac hit. 12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising: adjusting a proppant concentration based, at least in part, on a comparison between the predicted volume-to-frac-hit and a slurry volume, wherein the slurry volume is determined based on the calculated proppant ramp schedule. 13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising: determining if the adjusted proppant concentration is allowable; and if the adjusted proppant concentration is not allowable, increasing the predicted volume-to-frac-hit by adjusting one or more hydraulic fracturing parameters. 14. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable by a computing device, the instructions to: determine an interference time for a hydraulic fracturing stage of a child well based, at least in part, on a measured pressure response in a parent well; determine an interference volume for the hydraulic fracturing stage of the child well based, at least in part, on the interference time and an integral of a treatment rate in the child well; and determine a fracture length between the child well and a depleted reservoir region of the parent well for the hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the interference volume; and estimate a distance to a depleted reservoir boundary of the depleted reservoir region based, at least in part, on the determined fracture length. 15. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to: determine a flow-distribution factor for the hydraulic fracturing stage based on at least one of a poro-elastic model and a planar model, wherein the flow-distribution factor is a measure of a uniformity of a fluid transport through the determined fracture length; and wherein the instructions to determine the fracture length comprise instructions to determine the fracture length based on the flow-distribution factor. 16. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to: predict a fracture length for a future hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the determined fracture length for one or more hydraulic fracturing stages; predict a volume-to-frac-hit based on the predicted fracture length; and calculate a proppant ramp schedule based on the predicted volume-to-frac hit. 17. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to: adjust a proppant concentration based, at least in part, on a comparison between the predicted volume-to-frac-hit and a slurry volume, wherein the slurry volume is determined based on the calculated proppant ramp schedule; and determine if the adjusted proppant concentration is allowable; and if the adjusted proppant concentration is not allowable, increase the predicted volume-to-frac-hit by adjusting one or more hydraulic fracturing parameters for the future hydraulic fracturing stage. 18. An apparatus comprising: a processor; and a computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to, determine an interference time for a hydraulic fracturing stage of a child well based, at least in part, on a measured pressure response in a parent well; determine an interference volume for the hydraulic fracturing stage of the child well based, at least in part, on the interference time and an integral of a treatment rate in the child well; determine a flow-distribution factor for the hydraulic fracturing stage based on at least one of a poro-elastic model and a planar model, wherein the flow-distribution factor is a measure of a uniformity of a fluid transport through a fracture; and determine a fracture length between the child well and a depleted reservoir region of the parent well for the hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the interference volume and the flow-distribution factor; and estimate a distance to a depleted reservoir boundary of the depleted reservoir region based, at least in part, on the determined fracture length. 19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the instructions comprise instructions executable by the processor to cause the processor to: predict a fracture length for a future hydraulic fracturing stage based, at least in part, on the determined fracture length for one or more hydraulic fracturing stages; predict a volume-to-frac-hit based on the predicted fracture length; and calculate a proppant ramp schedule based on the predicted volume-to-frac hit. 20. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the instructions comprise instructions executable by the processor to cause the processor to: adjust a proppant concentration based, at least in part, on a comparison between the predicted volume-to-frac-hit and a slurry volume, wherein the slurry volume is determined based on the calculated proppant ramp schedule; and determine if the adjusted proppant concentration is allowable; and if the adjusted proppant concentration is not allowable, i

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • E21B43/267Primary

    reinforcing fractures by propping · CPC title

  • by injection test; by analysing pressure variations in an injection or production test, e.g. for estimating the skin factor (measuring pressure E21B47/06) · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US11753917B2 cover?
When a child well is hydraulically fractured near the depleted reservoir volume surrounding a previously produced parent well, it is economically efficient to deliver proppant to the formation volume and fractures not reached by the parent well. A fracture length, which is the distance fluid travels from the child well to the depleted region, is calculated as a function of fracture stage. From …
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification E21B43/267. Mapped technology areas include Fixed Constructions.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Sep 12 2023 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).