System and Method of Operating a Batch Melting Furnace
US-2019360067-A1 · Nov 28, 2019 · US
US11740022B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11740022-B2 |
| Application number | US-202016935248-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 22, 2020 |
| Priority date | Jul 22, 2020 |
| Publication date | Aug 29, 2023 |
| Grant date | Aug 29, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A control scheme for a furnace can use real-time and historical data to model performance and determine relationships between different data and performance parameters for use in correcting suboptimal performance of the furnace in real-time. Operational parameters can be logged throughout the cycle for all cycles for a period of time in order to establish a baseline. This data can then be used to calculate the performance of the process. A regression analysis can be carried out in order to determine which parameters affect different aspects of performance. These relationships can then be used to predict performance during a single cycle in real-time and provide closed or open loop feedback to control furnace operation to result in enhanced performance.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for controlling operation of a furnace to melt a material that comprises metal, the method comprising: storing data parameters related to the charge material, furnace condition and operation data for the furnace for a plurality of different cycles of operation of the furnace in a non-transitory computer readable medium of a computer device; creating or determining one or more cycle performance parameters based on the stored data parameters; creating a historian data store based on the stored data parameters and the cycle performance parameters, the historian data store being created such that outlier data for each of the one or more cycle performance parameters is not included in the historian data store, the outlier data for each of the one or more cycle performance parameters being data for that cycle performance parameter that is outside of a pre-selected variance range for an average value for the cycle performance parameter; after removal of the outlier data to create the historian data store, determining x-variables from the historian data store for one or more cycles of operation of the furnace and feeding the x-variables into a regression model to determine a relationship between at least one of the x-variables with at least one y-variable to define at least one reference cycle, each y-variable corresponding to a respective one of the cycle performance parameters; receiving real-time data from sensors of the furnace; comparing the real-time data from the sensors of the furnace to the at least one reference cycle to determine whether an adjustment to one or more furnace operational parameters is needed; upon determining that a difference from the at least one reference cycle exists that meets or exceeds a significance threshold based on the comparing of the real-time data from the sensors of the furnace to the at least one reference cycle, adjusting operation of the furnace so that operation of the furnace is adjusted to converge toward a pre-selected furnace performance defined by the at least one reference cycle and determining the relationship between x-variables and y-variables via the regression model to identify one or more significant x-variables, insignificant x-variables being x-variables determined to have an effect that is below a pre-selected significance threshold and each of the one or more significant x-variables having an effect that is above the pre-selected significance threshold; utilizing the real-time data from the sensors of the furnace for the identified one or more significant x-variables to calculate at least one desired cycle performance parameter value for use in improving furnace operation for a cycle of furnace operation. 2. The method of claim 1 , comprising generating the at least one reference cycle, the generating of the at least one reference cycle comprising: characterizing the cycles of operation of the furnace into one or more material groups for generation of the at least one reference cycle for a desired performance of the furnace. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the creating of the historian data store comprises removing the outlier data from material groups before feeding the data parameters to the regression model, the outlier data from the material groups being the data parameters that are outside a pre-selected variance from an average value. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one y-variable comprises: a first y-variable for specific fuel consumption, a second y-variable for melt rate and a third y-variable for yield. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one reference cycle for each y-variable is determined by identifying one or more best case cycles of operation of the furnace. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one reference cycle is a single best reference cycle or includes multiple best reference cycles that are defined based on the charge material to be fed to the furnace. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein each reference cycle is an average of best case cycles of furnace operation for a particular type of charge material. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the regression model determines the relationship between x-variables and y-variables and is also used to identify insignificant x-variables so that the insignificant x-variables are removable, the insignificant x-variables being x-variables determined to have an effect that is below a pre-selected significance threshold. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the real-time data from the sensors of the furnace include charge material data, furnace condition data and operational data. 10. The method of claim 1 , comprising: communicating data for the adjusting operation of the furnace to a computer device of an operator so that the operation of the furnace is adjusted to converge toward the furnace performance defined by the at least one reference cycle so operation of the furnace is adjusted to converge toward a desired performance of the furnace. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting of the operation of the furnace so that operation of the furnace is adjusted comprises: communicating data for the adjusting of the operation of the furnace to a first computer device operatively connected to the furnace so that the operation of the furnace is adjusted. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting of the operation of the furnace so that operation of the furnace is adjusted to converge toward the pre-selected furnace performance defined by the at least one reference cycle includes using the calculated at least one desired cycle performance parameter value to adjust the operation of the furnace.
Arrangement of controlling, monitoring, alarm or the like devices · CPC title
Arrangement of controlling, monitoring, alarm or like devices · CPC title
Arrangement of controlling, monitoring, alarm or like devices · CPC title
Arrangements of controlling devices · CPC title
Working up raw materials other than ores, e.g. scrap, to produce non-ferrous metals and compounds thereof; {Methods of a general interest or applied to the winning of more than two metals (briquetting of scrap C22B1/248; preliminary treatment of scrap C22B1/005)} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.