Interactive autonomous vehicle command controller
US-2017123422-A1 · May 4, 2017 · US
US11727730B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11727730-B2 |
| Application number | US-202017079775-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 26, 2020 |
| Priority date | Jul 2, 2018 |
| Publication date | Aug 15, 2023 |
| Grant date | Aug 15, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
This disclosure relates to a system configured to generate and provide timely vehicle event information for a fleet of vehicles including at least a first vehicle. Individual vehicles detect vehicle events and transmit related information to a remote computing server. The remote computing server determines whether the detected vehicles events are relevant to add to a set of vehicle events scenarios. For example, if a particular vehicle event is duplicative of a previous vehicle event, if may not need to be added. The newest vehicles events may be reported at certain intervals, in particular if they are indicative of a trend.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system configured to generate vehicle event information, the system configured to couple with a fleet of vehicles including a first vehicle, the system comprising: a remote computing server including one or ore processors configured via machine-readable instructions to: control access to a stored set of vehicle event scenarios that are associated with vehicle events, wherein individual vehicle event scenarios represent circumstances around a particular vehicle for at least a first predefined period prior to occurrences of potential vehicle events, wherein the potential vehicle events have particular event types, and wherein individual vehicle event scenarios include individual geographical locations; receive, from the first vehicle, information related to a detected vehicle event, wherein the detected vehicle event is associated with a particular geographical location, and wherein the detected vehicle event has a particular event type; compare the particular event type and the particular geographical location of the detected event with corresponding information for the stored set of vehicle event scenarios; and based on the comparison, determine whether to add a new vehicle event scenario to a set of new vehicle event scenarios that are not included in the stored set of vehicle event scenarios, wherein the new vehicle event scenario is based on the received information, and wherein the set of new vehicle event scenarios represents circumstances around particular vehicles that are related to vehicle events. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to generate a report of the set of new vehicle event scenarios at intervals not to exceed a maximum period of 90 days. 3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured via machine-readable instructions to: publish the report and/or transfer the report to a third party. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the comparison produces a metric that indicates a level of relevance by quantifying one or both of uniqueness and/or distinctiveness of the received information compared to the information included in the stored set of vehicle event scenarios. 5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured via machine-readable instructions to: receive user input through a user interface from a user, wherein the user input represents one or more of entry and/or selection of one or more user-controlled criteria that are controlled by the user, wherein the comparison is based on the one or more user-controlled criteria. 6. The system of claim 1 , further comprising: a set of resources carried by the first vehicle, wherein the set of resources includes a transceiver and one or more sensors, wherein the one or more sensors are configured to generate output signals conveying information related to one or both of circumstances around the first vehicle and/or operating conditions of the first vehicle, wherein the set of resources is configured to detect vehicle events, including the detected vehicle event, based on the generated output signals, wherein the transceiver is configured to transfer and receive information to and from the remote computing server, and wherein the transferred information includes vehicle-specific information related to the detected vehicle event. 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured via machine-readable instructions to: determine whether the new vehicle event scenario, the set of new vehicle event scenarios, and/or the stored set of vehicle event scenarios are indicative of a trend in detected vehicle events, wherein the determination is based on a statistical analysis, wherein the trend corresponds to an increase in a particular type of vehicle events compared to an expectation for the particular type of vehicle events, wherein the expectation is based on historical vehicle event information. 8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured via machine-readable instructions to: create a simulation that mimics the circumstances around the first vehicle at the time of the detected vehicle event. 9. A method for generating vehicle event information, the method being implemented in a system including a remote computing server, the system being coupled to a fleet of vehicles including a first vehicle, the method comprising: controlling, by the remote computing server, access to a stored set of vehicle event scenarios that are associated with vehicle events, wherein individual vehicle event scenarios represent circumstances around a particular vehicle for at least a first predefined period prior to occurrences of potential vehicle events, wherein the potential vehicle events have particular event types, and wherein individual vehicle event scenarios include individual geographical locations; receiving, from the first vehicle, information related to a detected vehicle event, wherein the detected vehicle event is associated with a particular geographical location, and wherein the detected vehicle event has a particular event type; comparing the particular event type and the particular geographical location of the detected event with corresponding information for the stored set of vehicle event scenarios; and based on the comparison, determining whether to add a new vehicle event scenario to a set of new vehicle event scenarios that are not included in the stored set of vehicle event scenarios, wherein the new vehicle event scenario is based on the received information, and wherein the set of new vehicle event scenarios represents circumstances around particular vehicles that are related to vehicle events. 10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising generating a report of the set of new vehicle event scenarios at intervals not to exceed a maximum period of 90 days. 11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the comparison produces a metric that indicates a level of relevance by quantifying one or both of uniqueness and/or distinctiveness of the received information compared to the information included in the stored set of vehicle event scenarios. 12. The method of claim 9 , further comprising: receiving user input through a user interface from a user, wherein the user input represents one or more of entry and/or selection of one or more user-controlled criteria that are controlled by the user, wherein the comparison is based on the one or more user-controlled criteria. 13. The method of claim 9 , further comprising: generating output signals conveying information related to one or both of circumstances around the first vehicle and/or operating conditions of the first vehicle; detecting vehicle events, including the detected vehicle event, based on the generated output signals; transferring information from the first vehicle to the remote computing server, wherein the transferred information includes vehicle-specific information related to the detected vehicle event; and receiving, by the remote computing server, the transferred information. 14. The method of claim 9 , further comprising: determining whether the new vehicle event scenario, the set of new vehicle event scenarios, and/or the stored set of vehicle event scenarios are indicative of a trend in detected vehicle events, wherein this determining is based on a statistical analysis, wherein the trend corresponds to an increase in a particular type of vehicle events compared to an expectation for the particular type of vehicle events, wherein the expectation is based on historical vehicle event information.
communicating information to a remotely located station (transmission systems for measured values G08C) · CPC title
Approximate or statistical queries · CPC title
Geographical information databases · CPC title
Spatial or temporal dependent retrieval, e.g. spatiotemporal queries · CPC title
Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.