Obstacle detection device
US-2016069990-A1 · Mar 10, 2016 · US
US11726203B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11726203-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916698240-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 27, 2019 |
| Priority date | May 30, 2017 |
| Publication date | Aug 15, 2023 |
| Grant date | Aug 15, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An object detection device includes: a wave receiver that receives a reflected wave generated by reflection, by an object, of a transmission wave incident on the object; a determination section that determines whether, in a change over time in an amplitude of the reflected wave received by the wave receiver, an amplitude of a falling portion is greater than a predetermined criterion, the amplitude of the falling portion being decreased after the amplitude has reached a maximum value; and a processing section that, on the basis of a determination by the determination section that the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion, performs a process in which the object is treated as an object to be avoided.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. An object detection device comprising: a wave receiver that receives a reflected wave generated by reflection, by an object, of a transmission wave incident on the object; a determination section that determines whether, in a change over time in an amplitude of the reflected wave received by the wave receiver, an amplitude of a falling portion is greater than a predetermined criterion, the amplitude of the falling portion being decreased after the amplitude has reached a maximum value; and a processing section that, on the basis of a determination by the determination section that the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion, performs a process in which the object is treated as an object to be avoided, wherein the wave receiver receives an additional reflected wave generated by reflection, by an object, of an additional transmission wave incident on the object, transmission of the additional transmission wave being started within a predetermined reference interval after transmission of the transmission wave is ended, and on the basis of an amplitude of a composite wave in a time period between time points at which the amplitude has reached respective two maximal values in a change over time in the amplitude of the composite wave, the determination section determines whether the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion, the composite wave being a combination of the reflected wave and the additional reflected wave, the two maximal values being equal to or greater than a reference value. 2. The object detection device according to claim 1 , wherein in response to a duration being longer than a reference length, the determination section determines that the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion, the duration being a time from a time point at which the amplitude is increased to a first value before the falling portion to a time point at which the amplitude is decreased to a second value in the falling portion. 3. The object detection device according to claim 1 , wherein in response to a minimal value in the time period between the time points exceeding a determination value, the determination section determines that the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion. 4. The object detection device according to claim 1 , wherein when a ratio between a largest maximal value of the amplitude and a second largest maximal value of the amplitude is in a predetermined range, on the basis of the amplitude in the time period between the time points, the determination section determines whether the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion. 5. The object detection device according to claim 1 , wherein in response to the maximum value being greater than a specified value, the determination section determines whether the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion, and in response to the maximum value being equal to or lower than the specified value, the determination section does not determine whether the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion. 6. An object detection device comprising: a wave receiver that receives a reflected wave generated by reflection, by an object, of a transmission wave incident on the object; a determination section that determines whether, in a change over time in an amplitude of the reflected wave received by the wave receiver, an amplitude of a falling portion is greater than a predetermined criterion, the amplitude of the falling portion being decreased after the amplitude has reached a maximum value; and a processing section that, on the basis of a determination by the determination section that the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion, performs a process in which the object is treated as an object to be avoided, wherein in response to the number of times that the determination section has determined that the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion exceeding a comparison value, the processing section performs the process in which the object is treated as an object to be avoided, and in response to the number of times that the determination section has determined that the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion not exceeding the comparison value, the processing section does not treat the object as an object to be avoided. 7. An object detection device comprising: a wave receiver that receives a reflected wave generated by reflection, by an object, of a transmission wave incident on the object; a determination section that determines whether, in a change over time in an amplitude of the reflected wave received by the wave receiver, an amplitude of a falling portion is greater than a predetermined criterion, the amplitude of the falling portion being decreased after the amplitude has reached a maximum value; and a processing section that, on the basis of a determination by the determination section that the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion, performs a process in which the object is treated as an object to be avoided, wherein the falling portion is a first falling portion, the predetermined criterion is a first predetermined criterion, the wave receiver is a first wave receiver, the first wave receiver transmits the transmission wave, a second wave receiver also receives the reflected wave, the second wave receiver being arranged at a different position from the first wave receiver, the determination section determines whether an amplitude of the first falling portion is greater than the first predetermined criterion, and determines whether, in a change over time in an amplitude of the reflected wave received by the second wave receiver, an amplitude of a second falling portion after the amplitude has reached a maximum value is greater than a second predetermined criterion, in response to a determination by the determination section that the amplitude of the first falling portion is greater than the first predetermined criterion and the amplitude of the second falling portion is greater than the second predetermined criterion, the processing section performs the process in which the object is treated as an object to be avoided, and in response to one or both of a condition that the amplitude of the first falling portion is greater than the first predetermined criterion and a condition that the amplitude of the second falling portion is greater than the second predetermined criterion not being satisfied, the processing section does not treat the object as an object to be avoided. 8. An object detection device comprising: a wave receiver that receives a reflected wave generated by reflection, by an object, of a transmission wave incident on the object; a determination section that determines whether, in a change over time in an amplitude of the reflected wave received by the wave receiver, an amplitude of a falling portion is greater than a predetermined criterion, the amplitude of the falling portion being decreased after the amplitude has reached a maximum value; and a processing section that, on the basis of a determination by the determination section that the amplitude of the falling portion is greater than the predetermined criterion, performs a process in which the object is treated as an object to be avoided, wherein the predetermined criterion is one of a plurality of predetermined criteria, the wave receiver is a first wave receiver of a plurality of wave receivers, the first wave receiver transm
wherein transceivers are operated, either sequentially or simultaneously, both in bi-static and in mono-static mode, e.g. cross-echo mode · CPC title
Systems determining presence of a target · CPC title
using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated · CPC title
of land vehicles · CPC title
in the bumper area · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.